This article asks about the conditions of a sociological operationalization of the capability approach developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Raising the question of freedom and social opportunities, the capability approach has so far mainly been discussed by economists and philosophers. In order to adopt this approach for a sociological and pragmatist perspective, it engages with methodological and theoretical issues. Whereas capabilities have until now mainly been studied within quantitative frameworks, the author opts for a qualitative method of inquiry that draws on a pragmatist and configurational approach. Such a shift towards qualitative inquiry is a key condition for a better sociological understanding of notions like freedom and opportunities that stand at the core of the capability approach.
Alkire, Sabina (2002) Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Berlin, Isaiah (1969) ‘Two Concepts on Liberty’, in Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
Blumer, Herbert (1969 [1998]) ‘The Methodological Position of Symbolic Interactionism’, in Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, pp. 1-60. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bonvin, Jean-Michel and Farvaque, Nicolas (2004) ‘Social Opportunities and Individual Responsibility: The Capability Approach and the Third Way’, Ethics and Economics2(2), http://Ethique-economique.org.
6.
Cefaï, Daniel and Joseph, Isaac (eds) (2002) L’Héritage du pragmatisme: conflits d’urbanité et épreuves de civisme. La Tour d’Aigues: Editions de l’Aube.
7.
Chauviré, Christiane (2002) ‘Dispositions ou capacités? La Philosophie sociale de Wittgenstein’, in Christiane Chauviré and Albert Ogien (eds) La Régularité: habitude, disposition et savoir-faire dans l’explication de l’action. Paris: Editions EHESS, Raisons pratiques 13: 25-48.
8.
Corteel, Delphine and Zimmermann, Bénédicte (2006) Employability, Voice and Security: An Inquiry into the Capabilities of Workers in French Firms, Paris: Document de travail de l’IDHE, Série Règles, Institutions, Conventions, no. 06-01.
9.
Dewey, John (1938) Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt.
10.
Dewey, John (1981) ‘The Problem of Freedom’ and ‘Culture and Human Nature’, in John J. McDermott (ed.) The Philosophy of John Dewey, pp. 665-696. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Dewey, John (1984) The Later Works, 1925-1953. Vol. 2: 1926-1927. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
12.
Elias, Norbert (1971) Was ist Soziologie? München: Juventa.
13.
Farvaque, Nicolas (2005) Action publique et approche par les capacités: une analyse des trajectoires et dispositifs d’insertion. PHD, Paris: Université de Marne-La-Vallée.
14.
Garreta, Guillaume (2004) ‘Enquête et observation: Dewey et les ressources de l’observable’, in Bruno Karsenti and Louis Quéré (eds) La Croyance et l’enquête: aux sources du pragmatisme. Paris: Editions EHESS, Raisons pratiques 15: 111-40.
15.
Gasper, Des (2002) ‘Is Sen’s Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development?’Review of Political Economy14(4): 435-461.
16.
Giddens, Anthony (1984) The Constitution of Society: An Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
17.
Gilbert, Neil (2002) Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
Granger, Gilles-Gaston (1995) Le Probable, le possible et le virtuel. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.
19.
Honneth, Axel (2004) ‘Organized Self-Realization: Some Paradoxes of Individualization’, European Journal of Social Theory7(4): 463-478.
20.
Joas, Hans (1992) Pragmatismus und Gesellschaftstheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
21.
Jordan, Bill (2005) ‘Social Theory and Social Policy: Choice, Order and Human Well-Being’, European Journal of Social Theory8(2): 149-170.
22.
Nussbaum, Martha (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Passeron, Jean-Claude (1991) Le Raisonnement sociologique: l’espace non popperien du raisonnement naturel. Paris: Nathan.
24.
Putnam, Hilary (2002) The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy, and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Robeyns, Ingrid (2003) ‘Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities’, Feminist Economics3(2/3): 61-92.
26.
Robeyns, Ingrid (2005) ‘The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey’, Journal of Human Development6 (1): 93-114.
27.
Rudischhauser, Sabine and Zimmermann, Bénédicte (2004) ‘De la critique à l’expertise. La Modernisation de l’action publique: le cas du chômage en France et en Allemagne’, in Bénédicte Zimmermann (ed.) Les Sciences sociales à l’épreuve de l’action: le savant, le politique et l’Europe. Paris: Editions Maison des Sciences de l’Homme: 247-85.
28.
Sen, Amartya (1982) Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.
29.
Sen, Amartya (1987) On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
30.
Sen, Amartya (1992) Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Sen, Amartya (1993) ‘Capability and Well-Being’, in Martha Nussbaum and Amartya Sen (eds) The Quality of Life, pp. 30-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
Sen, Amartya (1997a) ‘L’Inégalité, le chômage et l’Europe aujourd’hui’, Revue internationale du travail136 (2): 169-186.
33.
Sen, Amartya (1997b) ‘Editorial: Human Capital and Human Capability’, World Development25(12): 1959-1961.
34.
Sen, Amartya (2002) ‘Positional Objectivity’, in Rationality and Freedom, pp. 463-483. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, Harvard University Press.
35.
Simmel, Georg (1992 [1908]) Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
36.
Storper, Mickael and Salais, Robert (1997 [1993]) Worlds of Production: The Action Frameworks of the Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Stråth, Bo (ed.) (2000) After Full Employment. European Discourses on Work and Flexibility. Bruxelles: PIE-Lang.
38.
Wagner, Peter (1994) A Sociology of Modernity: Liberty and Discipline. London: Routledge.
39.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1964) Remarques philosophiques. Paris: Gallimard.
40.
Zimmermann, Bénédicte (2004) ‘Competences-Oriented Logics and the Politics of Employability’, in Robert Salais and Robert Villeneuve (eds) Europe and the Politics of Capabilities, pp. 38-53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Zimmermann, Bénédicte (2006) ‘Les Groupements d’employeurs: la sécurité dans la flexibilité?’, Sociologie du travail48(1): 1-16.
