Building upon the notion of proportionality, this article proposes a line of argument in favor of nonreductive explanations in the social sciences. I argue that many higher-level explanations in the social sciences, i.e., explanations over and above the individual-level, are legitimate explanations insofar as their explanantia are proportional to their given explananda of interest. These higher-level explanations are often favored over their individual-level reductive counterparts because they are strictly more informative than their reductive counterparts.
AgassiJoseph. 1975. “Institutional Individualism.” British Journal of Sociology26 (2): 144–55.
2.
BechtelWilliam. 2006. Discovering Cell Mechanisms: The Creation of Modern Cell Biology. Cambridge University Press.
3.
BlanchardThomas. 2020. “Explanatory Abstraction and the Goldilocks Problem: Interventionism Gets Things Just Right.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science71 (2): 633–63.
4.
BoudonRaymond. 1968 (1971). The Uses of Structuralism. Translated by Michalina Vaughan. Heinemann.
5.
BourratPierrick. 2019. “Variation of Information as a Measure of One-to-One Causal Specificity.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science9 (1): 11.
6.
BulleNathalie. 2019. “Methodological Individualism as Anti-Reductionism.” Journal of Classical Sociology19 (2): 161–84.
7.
BulleNathalieDi IorioFrancesco, eds. 2023a. The Palgrave Handbook of Methodological Individualism: Vol. I. Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BulleNathalieDi IorioFrancesco, eds. 2023b. The Palgrave Handbook of Methodological Individualism: Vol. II. Palgrave Macmillan.
ChalupkaKrzysztofEberhardtFrederickPeronaPietro. 2017. “Causal Feature Learning: An Overview.” Behaviormetrika44: 137–64.
11.
CraverCarl F.2007. Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
12.
CurrieGregory. 1984. “Individualism and Global Supervenience.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science35 (4): 345–58.
13.
Di IorioFrancesco. 2024. “Methodological Individualism and Agent-Based Computational Simulation: A Reply to Kincaid and Zahle.” Social Science Information63 (2): 155–67.
14.
Di IorioFrancescoChenShu-Heng. 2019. “On the Connection Between Agent-Based Simulation and Methodological Individualism.” Social Science Information58 (2): 354–76.
15.
DowePhil. 2010. “Proportionality and Omissions.” Analysis70 (3): 446–51.
16.
DuijfHeinTammingaAllardVan De PutteFrederik. 2021. “An Impossibility Result on Methodological Individualism.” Philosophical Studies178 (12): 4165–85.
17.
EberhardtFrederickFangWeiZhangJiji. nd. “Proportionality and the Effect-of-Cause Question.” Unpublished Manuscript.
18.
ElsterJon. 1985. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge University Press.
19.
FangWei. 2025. “Proportionality Contextualised.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science38 (3): 219–39.
Franklin-HallL. R.2016. “High-Level Explanation and the Interventionist’s ‘Variables Problem’.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science67 (2): 553–77.
22.
GlennanStuart. 2002. “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation.” Philosophy of Science69 (S3): S342–53.
23.
GlennanStuart. 2017. The New Mechanical Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Hansson WahlbergTobias. 2019. “Why the Social Sciences are Irreducible.” Synthese196: 4961–87.
26.
JacksonFrankPettitPhilip. 1992a. “Defense of Explanatory Ecumenism.” Economics and Philosophy8 (1): 1–21.
27.
JacksonFrankPettitPhilip. 1992b. “Structural Explanation in Social Theory.” In Reduction, Explanation, and Realism, edited by CharlesDavidLennonKathleen, 97–131. Oxford University Press. https://philarchive.org/archive/JACSEI
28.
KincaidHarold. 1986. “Reduction, Explanation, and Individualism.” Philosophy of Science53 (4): 492–513.
29.
KincaidHarold. 1996. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511625442.
30.
KincaidHarold. 2017. “Philosophy Without Borders, Naturally: An Interview with Harold Kincaid.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics10 (1): 83–100.
31.
LawsonTony. 1997. Economics and Reality. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203195390.
32.
ListChristianMenziesPeter. 2009. “Nonreductive Physicalism and the Limits of the Exclusion Principle.” Journal of Philosophy106 (9): 475–502.
33.
ListChristianSpiekermannKai. 2013. “Methodological Individualism and Holism in Political Science: A Reconciliation.” American Political Science Review107 (4): 629–43.
34.
MachamerPeterDardenLindleyCraverCarl F.. 2000. “Thinking About Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science67 (1): 1–25.
35.
McDonnellNeil. 2017. “Causal Exclusion and the Limits of Proportionality.” Philosophical Studies174 (6): 1459–74.
36.
McGinleyWilliam. 2012. “Reduction in Sociology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences42 (3): 370–98.
37.
McGrathMatthew. 1998. “Proportionality and Mental Causation: A Fit?” Philosophical Perspectives12: 167–76.
38.
PearlJudea. 2000 (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
39.
PochevilleArnaudGriffithsPaul E.StotzKarola. 2017. “Comparing Causes: An Information-Theoretic Approach to Specificity, Proportionality and Stability.” In Proceedings of the 15th Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 1–20. College Publications.
40.
PsacharopoulosGeorgePatrinosHarry Anthony. 2018. “Returns to Investment in Education: A Decennial Review of the Global Literature.” Education Economics26 (5): 445–58.
41.
SawyerR. Keith. 2002. “Nonreductive Individualism: Part I–Supervenience and Wild Disjunction.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences32 (4): 537–59.
42.
SawyerR. Keith. 2003. “Nonreductive Individualism Part II–Social Causation.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences33 (2): 203–24.
43.
SawyerR. Keith. 2005. Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge University Press.
44.
SpirtesPeterScheinesRichard. 2004. “Causal Inference of Ambiguous Manipulations.” Philosophy of Science71 (5): 833–45.
45.
SteelDaniel. 2006. “Methodological Individualism, Explanation, and Invariance.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences36 (4): 440–63.
46.
StrevensMichael. 2004. “The Causal and Unification Approaches to Explanation Unified: Causally.” Noûs38 (1): 154–76.
47.
StrevensMichael. 2008. Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation. Harvard University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv1dv0tnw.
ZahleJulie. 2016 (2023). “Methodological Holism in the Social Sciences.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by EdwardN. ZaltaUriNodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/holism-social/
60.
ZahleJulieKincaidHarold. 2019. “Why Be a Methodological Individualist?” Synthese196 (2): 655–75.
61.
ZhongLei. 2014. “Sophisticated Exclusion and Sophisticated Causation.” Journal of Philosophy111 (7): 341–60.
62.
ZhongLei. 2022. “Why Causation Is Biconditional But Not Proportional.” American Philosophical Quarterly59 (3): 263–71.
