This essay will defend a causal conception of action explanations in terms of an agent’s reasons by delineating a metaphysical and epistemic framework that allows us to view folk psychology as providing us with causal and autonomous explanatory strategies of accounting for individual agency. At the same time, I will calm philosophical concerns about the issue of causal deviance that have been at the center of the recent debates between causalist and noncausalist interpretations of action explanations. For that purpose, it is important to realize that the domain of folk-psychological action explanation is also the domain of skillful and goal-directed bodily movements, a domain to which we have independent epistemic access.
AlvarezM.2010. Kinds of Reasons: An Essay in the Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AnscombeG. E. M. (1957) 2000. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BishopJ.1989. Natural Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ChalmersD.1997. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
CsibraG.2007. “Action Mirroring and Action Interpretation: An Alternative Account.” In Sensorimotor Foundations of Higher Cognition, edited by HaggardP.RosettiY.KawatoM., 435-59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
CsibraG.GergelyG.2007. “‘Obsessed with Goals’: Functions and Mechanisms of Teleological Interpretation of Actions in Humans.” Acta Psychologica124:60-78.
7.
DancyJ.2000. Practical Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
DavidsonD. (1963) 1980. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” In Essays on Actions and Events, 3-19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
EncB.2003. How We Act: Causes, Reasons, and Intentions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10.
GallagherS.HuttoD.2008. “Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative Practice.” In The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, edited by ZlatevJ.RacineT.SinhaC.ItkonenE., 17-38. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
11.
GoldmanA.2009. “Mirroring, Simulating and Mindreading.” Mind and Language24:235-52.
12.
GuglielmoS.MalleB.2010. “Enough Skill to Kill: Intentionality Judgments and the Moral Valence of Action.” Cognition117:139-50.
HendersonD.2011. “Let’s be Flexible: Our Interpretive/Explanatory Toolbox, or in Praise of Using a Range of Tools.” Journal of the Philosophy of History5:261-99.
15.
HickokG.2008. “Eight Problems for the Mirror Neuron Theory of Action Understanding in Monkeys and Humans.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience21:1229-43.
16.
HuttoD.1999. “A Cause for Concern: Reasons, Causes and Explanation.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research59:381-401.
17.
IacoboniM.2011. “Within Each Other: Neural Mechanisms for Empathy in the Primate Brain.” In Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, edited by CoplanA.GoldieP., 45-57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
JacobP.2008. “What Do Mirror Neurons Contribute to Human Social Cognition?” Mind and Language23:190-223.
19.
LeuridanB.FroeymanA.2012. “On Lawfulness in History and Historiography.” History and Theory51:172-92.
20.
MalleB.2004. How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
MantzavinosC.2012. “Explanations of Meaningful Actions.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences42:224-38.
SchuelerG. F.2003. Reasons and Purposes: Human Rationality and the Teleological Explanation of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
Schueler, G. F. 2009. “Interpretative Explanations.” In New Essays on the Explanation of Action, edited by SandisC., 112-31. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
SehonS.2005. Teleological Realism: Mind, Agency, and Explanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
SmithM.1994. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.
StueberK.2002. “The Psychological Basis of Historical Explanation: Reenactment, Simulation, and the Fusion of Horizons.” History and Theory21:25-42.
31.
StueberK.2005. “Mental Causation and the Paradox of Explanation.” Philosophical Studies122:243-77.
32.
StueberK.2006. Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psychology, and the Human Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
StueberK.2008. “Reasons, Generalizations, Empathy, and Narratives: The Epistemic Structure of Action Explanation.” History and Theory47:31-43.
34.
StueberK.2011. “Imagination, Empathy, and Moral Deliberation: The Case of Imaginative Resistance.” Southern Journal of Philosophy49 (spindel supplement):156-80.
35.
StueberK.2012a. “Understanding vs. Explanation? How to Think about the Difference between the Human and the Natural Sciences.” Inquiry55:17-32.
36.
StueberK.2012b. “Varieties of Empathy, Neuroscience, and the Narrativist Challenge to the Contemporary Theory of Mind Debate.” Emotion Review4:55-63.
37.
StueberK.Forthcoming. “Explaining Human Agency: Reasons, Causes and the First Person Perspective.” In Reasons and Causes: Causalism and Non-causalism in the Philosophy of Action, edited by D’OroG.SandisC.New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
38.
TanneyJ.1995. “Why Reasons May Not Be Causes.” Mind and Language108:105-28.
39.
TanneyJ.2005. “Reason-Explanation and the Contents of the Mind.” Ratio17:338-51.
40.
TanneyJ.2009. “Reasons and Non-causal, Context-Placing Explanation.” New Essays on the Explanation of Action, edited by SandisC., 94-111. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
TomaselloM.RakoczyH.2003. “What Makes Human Cognition Unique? From Individual to Shared to Collective Intentionality.” Mind and Language18:121-47.
42.
TurnerS. 2010. Explaining the Normative. Cambridge: Polity Press.
43.
VellemanJ. D.2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
44.
WilsonG.1989. The Intentionality of Human Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
WilsonG.1997. “Reasons as Causes for Action.” In Contemporary Action Theory: Individual Action, edited by Homström-HintikkaG.TuomelaR., 65-82. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
46.
WilsonG.2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
WoodwardJ.HitchcockC.2003. “Explanatory Generalizations, Part I: A Counterfactual Account.” Nous37:1-24.
