This is a commentary on William Lynch’s Minority Report, which is a synthesis of the last 75 years of STS writings with philosophical themes from Lakatos, Feyerabend, and others. The comment questions the continued relevance of older ideas of scientific opinion which rested on the supposed autonomy of scientists in the face of the present grant system and the bureaucracy of peer review. The magnitude of the funding of science, and its apparent biases, call the whole of the inherited view of science into question.
GervaisWill M. 2021. “Practical Methodological Reform Needs Good Theory.” Perspectives on Psychological Science: 1‐17.
4.
HolbrookK. A.P. R.Sanberg. 2013. “Understanding the High Cost of Success in University Research.” Technology & Innovation15: 269‐280. DOI: 10.3727/194982413X13790020922068.
5.
KelsenHans. 1947The Metamorphoses of the Idea of Justice. Interpretations of Modern Legal Philosophies: Essays in Honor of Roscoe Pound, edited by SayrePaul, ed., Pp. 390–418 Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
KhokhlovA. N.2020. “How Scientometrics Became the Most Important Science for Researchers of All Specialties.” Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin75, 4: 159‐163. DOI: 10.3103/S0096392520040057.
7.
KuhnThomas. [1962] 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed.Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
LynchWilliam. 2020. Minority Report: Dissent and Diversity in Science. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
