This article argues for the explanatory autonomy of psychology drawing on cases from the multilevel modeling practice. This is done by considering a multilevel linear model in personality and social psychology, and discussing its philosophical implications for the reductionism debate in philosophy of psychology. I argue that this practice challenges the reductionist position in philosophy of psychology, and supports the explanatory autonomy of psychology.
AartsEmmekeDolanConor V.VerhageMatthijsvan der SluisSophie. 2015. “Multilevel Analysis Quantifies Variation in the Experimental Effect While Optimizing Power and Preventing False Positives.” BMC Neuroscience16 (1): Article 94.
2.
AartsEmmekeVerhageMatthijsVeenvlietJesse V.DolanConor V.Van Der SluisSophie. 2014. “A Solution to Dependency: Using Multilevel Analysis to Accommodate Nested Data.” Nature Neuroscience17 (4): 491-96.
AizawaKenGillettCarl. 2011. “The Autonomy of Psychology in the Age of Neuroscience.” In Causality in the Sciences, edited by McKay IllariPhyllisRussoFedericaWilliamsonJon, 202-23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
AizawaKennethGillettCarl. 2009. “The (Multiple) Realization of Psychological and Other Properties in the Sciences.” Mind & Language24 (2): 181-208.
Andersson-RoswallLenaEngmanElisabethSamuelssonHansMalmgrenKristina. 2010. “Cognitive Outcome 10 Years after Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery: A Prospective Controlled Study.” Neurology74 (24): 1977-85.
8.
ArdM. ColinRaghavanNandiniEdlandSteven D.2015. “Optimal Composite Scores for Longitudinal Clinical Trials under the Linear Mixed Effects Model.” Pharmaceutical Statistics14 (5): 418-26.
9.
BaayenR. HaraldDavidsonDouglas J.BatesDouglas M.2008. “Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items.” Journal of Memory and Language59 (4): 390-412.
10.
BechtelWilliam. 2010. “The Downs and Ups of Mechanistic Research: Circadian Rhythm Research as an Exemplar.” Erkenntnis73 (3): 313-28.
11.
BergerMartijn P. F.TanFrans E. S. 2004. “Robust Designs for Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics)53 (4): 569-81.
12.
BickleJohn. 1998. Psychoneural Reduction: The New Wave. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13.
BickleJohn. 2003. Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
14.
BilgelMuratPrinceJerry L.WongDean F.ResnickSusan M.JedynakBruno M.2016. “A Multivariate Nonlinear Mixed Effects Model for Longitudinal Image Analysis: Application to Amyloid Imaging.” NeuroImage134:658-70.
15.
BinghamNicholas H.FryJohn M.2010. Regression: Linear Models in Statistics. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
16.
BlockNed J.FodorJerry A.1972. “What Psychological States Are Not.” The Philosophical Review81 (2): 159-81.
BrykAnthony S.RaudenbushStephen W.1988. “Heterogeneity of Variance in Experimental Studies: A Challenge to Conventional Interpretations.” Psychological Bulletin104 (3): 396-404.
19.
ChristOliverSibleyChris G.WagnerUlrich. 2012. “Multilevel Modeling in Social and Personality Psychology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, edited by DeauxKaySnyderMark, 240-61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
ChurchlandPaul M.1989. A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
21.
ChurchlandPaul M.2007. Neurophilosophy at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
ClarkAusten. 1980. Psychological Models and Neural Mechanisms: An Examination of Reductionism in Psychology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23.
CraverCarl F.2005. “Beyond Reduction: Mechanisms, Multifield Integration and the Unity of Neuroscience.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences36 (2): 373-95.
24.
FangWei. 2019. “Mixed-Effects Modeling and Non-Reductive Explanation.” Philosophy of Science86 (5): 882-94.
25.
FigdorCarrie. 2010. “Neuroscience and the Multiple Realization of Cognitive Functions.” Philosophy of Science77 (3): 419-56.
26.
FodorJerry A.1968. Psychological Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychology. New York: Crown Publishing Group/Random House.
27.
FodorJerry A.1974. “Special Sciences (or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis).” Synthese28 (2): 97-115.
28.
FodorJerry A.1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
GoldsteinHarvey. 1995. Multilevel Statistical Models. New York: John Wiley.
GueorguievaRalitzaKrystalJohn H.2004. “Move over ANOVA: Progress in Analyzing Repeated-Measures Data and Its Reflection in Papers Published in the Archives of General Psychiatry.” Archives of General Psychiatry61 (3): 310-17.
32.
HeckRonald H.ThomasScott L.2015. An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques: MLM and SEM Approaches Using Mplus. 3rd ed.New York: Routledge.
33.
HuttenlocherJanellenHaightWendyBrykAnthonySeltzerMichaelLyonsThomas. 1991. “Early Vocabulary Growth: Relation to Language Input and Gender.” Developmental Psychology27 (2): 236-48.
34.
JamesGarethWittenDanielaHastieTrevorTibshiraniRobert. 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
35.
JessorRichard. 1958. “The Problem of Reductionism in Psychology.” Psychological Review65 (3): 170-78.
36.
JongLooren de HuibSchoutenMaurice K. D. 2005. “Ruthless Reductionism: A Review Essay of John Bickle’s Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account.” Philosophical Psychology18 (4): 473-86.
37.
KaiserMarie I.2015. Reductive Explanation in the Biological Sciences. Cham: Springer.
38.
KimJaegwon. 1992. “Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research52 (1): 1-26.
39.
KuppensPeterRealoAnuDienerEd. 2008. “The Role of Positive and Negative Emotions in Life Satisfaction Judgment across Nations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95 (1): 66-75.
40.
LazicStanley E.2010. “The Problem of Pseudoreplication in Neuroscientific Studies: Is It Affecting Your Analysis?”BMC Neuroscience11 (1): Article 5.
41.
LazicStanley E.EssiouxLaurent. 2013. “Improving Basic and Translational Science by Accounting for Litter-to-Litter Variation in Animal Models.” BMC Neuroscience14 (1): Article 37.
MarshallPeter J.2009. “Relating Psychology and Neuroscience: Taking up the Challenges.” Perspectives on Psychological Science4 (2): 113-25.
44.
MasonWilliam M.WongGeorge Y.EntwisleBarbara. 1983. “Contextual Analysis through the Multilevel Linear Model.” Sociological Methodology14:72-103.
45.
NagelErnest. 1961. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
46.
NezlekJohn B.2001. “Multilevel Random Coefficient Analyses of Event- and Interval-Contingent Data in Social and Personality Psychology Research.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27 (7): 771-85.
47.
NezlekJohn B.2008. “An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass2 (2): 842-60.
48.
ParzenMichaelGhoshSouparnoLipsitzStuartSinhaDebajyotiFitzmauriceGarrett M.MallickBani K.IbrahimJoseph G.2011. “A Generalized Linear Mixed Model for Longitudinal Binary Data with a Marginal Logit Link Function.” Annals of Applied Statistics5 (1): 449-67.
49.
PutnamHilary. 1967. “Psychological Predicates.” In Art, Mind, and Religion, edited by CapitanWilliam H.MerrillDaniel D., 37-48. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
50.
PutnamHilary. 1975. “Philosophy and Our Mental Life.” In Mind, Language, and Reality, edited by PutnamH.291-303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed.London: Sage.
52.
RaudenbushStephen W.LiuXiaofeng. 2000. “Statistical Power and Optimal Design for Multisite Randomized Trials.” Psychological Methods5 (2): 199-213.
53.
RosenbergAlexander. 2006. Darwinian Reductionism: Or, How to Stop Worrying and Love Molecular Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
SarkarSahotra. 1998. Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
SchaffnerKenneth F.1993. Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
ShiehYann-YannFouladiRachel T.2003. “The Effect of Multicollinearity on Multilevel Modeling Parameter Estimates and Standard Errors.” Educational and Psychological Measurement63 (6): 951-85.
57.
SingerJudith D.1998. “Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics23 (4): 323-55.
58.
StegmüllerWolfgang. 1976. The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. New York: Springer.
59.
SuppeFrederick. 1977. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
60.
SuppeFrederick. 1989. The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
61.
SuppesPatrick. 1962. “Models of Data.” In Logic, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science, edited by NagelErnestSuppesPatrickTarskiAlfred, 24-35. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
62.
SuppesPatrick. 1967. “What Is a Scientific Theory?” In Philosophy of Science Today, edited by MorgenbesserSidney55-67. New York: Meridian Books.
63.
WagnerUlrichChristOliverPettigrewThomas F.StellmacherJostWolfCarina. 2006. “Prejudice and Minority Proportion: Contact Instead of Threat Effects.” Social Psychology Quarterly69 (4): 380-90.
64.
WatersC. Kenneth. 2008. “Beyond Theoretical Reduction and Layer-Cake Antireduction: How DNA Retooled Genetics and Transformed Biological Practice.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, edited by RuseMichael 238-62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
WeberMarcel. 2005. Philosophy of Experimental Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
WestBrady T.WelchKathleen B.GaleckiAndrzej T.2015. Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
67.
YuHanJiangShanheLandKenneth C.2015. “Multicollinearity in Hierarchical Linear Models.” Social Science Research53:118-36.
