In this discussion note I clarify the motivation behind my original paper “Social Mechanisms, Causal Inference and the Policy Relevance of Social Science.” I argue that one of the tasks of philosophers of social science is to draw attention to methodological problems that are often forgotten or overlooked. Then I show that my original paper does not make the mistake or fallacy that Daniel Steel suggests in his comment on it.
de Vaus, D.2001. Research Design in Social Research. London: Sage Publications.
2.
Gilbert, N, ed. 2001. Researching Social Life (2nd edition). London : Sage Publications.
3.
Guala, F.2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Jones, R.A.1996. Research Methods in the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
5.
Schmidtz, D.1995. "Observing the Unobservable." In The Reliability of Economic Models, edited by D. Little.Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 147-72.
6.
Schutt, R.K.1996. Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press.
7.
Selten, R.2003. "Emergence and Future of Experimental Economics." In Observation and Experiment in the Natural and Social Sciences, edited by M. C. Galavotti.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 63-70.
8.
Steel, D.2004. "Social Mechanisms and Causal Inference," Philosophy of the Social Sciences34:55-78.
9.
Steel, D.2007. "With or Without Mechanisms. A Reply to Weber." Philosophy of the Social Sciences37:360-65.
10.
Van Bouwel, J., and E. Weber.2008. "A Pragmatic Defense of Explanatory Ecumenism in History and Social Science," History & Theory47:169-183.
11.
Weber, E.2007. "Social Mechanisms, Causal Inference, and the Policy Relevance of Social Science," Philosophy of the Social Sciences37:348-59.
12.
Weber, E., and J. Van Bouwel.2002. "Symposium on Explanations and Social Ontology 3: Can We Dispense with Structural Explanations of Social Facts? ", in Economics and Philosophy18:261-77.
