Abstract
Philip Mirowski’s recent book Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science continues to receive many reviews. Judging by recent reviews, this is a very controversial book. The question considered here is, how can one fairly review a controversial book—particularly when the book is widely popular and, for a history of economic thought book, a best seller? This essay uses Mirowski’s book as a case study to propose one answer for this question. In the process, it will examine how others seem to have answered this question.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
