Most contemporary political science researchers are advocates of multimethod research, however, the value and proper role of qualitative methodologies, like case study analysis, is disputed. A pluralistic philosophy of science can shed light on this debate. Methodological pluralism is indeed valuable, but does not entail causal pluralism. Pluralism about the goals of science is relevant to the debate and suggests a focus on the difference between evidence for warrant and evidence for use. I propose that case study research provides evidence for use through providing information that bears on the applicability of causal generalizations and risk assessment.
Beck, N.2006. Is causal-process observation an oxymoron? Political Analysis14:347-52.
2.
Bennett, A., and C. Elman.2006. Complex causal relations and case study methods: The example of path dependence. Political Analysis14:250-67.
3.
Brady, H. E., and D. Collier, eds. 2004. Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
4.
Brady, H.E., D. Collier, and J. Seawright.2006. Towards a pluralistic vision of methodology . Political Analysis14:353-68.
5.
Cartwright, N.2006. Well-ordered science: Evidence for use. Philosophy of Science73 (5): 981-90.
6.
Cartwright, N.2007. Hunting causes and using them: Studies in philosophy and economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Collier, D., H.E. Brady, and J. Seawright.2004. Sources of leverage in causal inference: Toward an alternative view of methodology. In Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse Tools, shared standards, edited by H. E. Brady and D. Collier.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
Fearon, J.2006. Iraq: Democracy or civil war? (modified October 2006). U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations . http://fsi.stanford.edu/publications/iraq_democracy_or_civil_war/ (accessed August 10, 2010).
9.
Fearon, J., and D.D. Laitin.2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war . American Political Science Review97 (1): 75-90.
10.
Fearon, J., and D.D. Laitin.2008. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. In The Oxford handbook of political methodology, edited by J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, and D. Collier.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
George, A.L., and A. Bennett.2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Gerring, J.2004. What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review98 (2): 341-54.
13.
Gerring, J.2005. Causation: A unified framework for the social sciences . Journal of Theoretical Politics17 (2): 168-98.
14.
Gerring, J.2007. Case study research: Principles and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Hitchcock, C.2003. Of Humean Bondage. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science54:1-25.
16.
Holland, P.1986. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association81:945-70.
17.
King, G., R.O. Keohane, and S. Verba.1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
Mahoney, J.2003. Strategies of causal assessment in comparative historical analysis. In Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, edited by J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Mahoney, J., and G. Goertz.2006. A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis14:227-49.
20.
McHugh, N. Forthcoming. More than skin deep: Situated communities and the case of Agent Orange in the Aluoi Valley, Viet Nam. In Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge, edited by H. Grasswick.Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
21.
McKeown, T.J.1999. Case studies and the statistical worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. International Organization53 (1): 161-90.
22.
Reiss, J.2009. Causation in the social sciences: Evidence, inference, and purpose. Philosophy of the Social Sciences39 (1): 20-40.
23.
Suppes, P.1970. A probabilistic theory of causality. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
