In his recent review of my book, The Structure of Social Theory, Karsten Stueber rejected my criticisms of contemporary social theory. Against my “hermeneutic” sociology which prioritizes human social relations, he advocates a return to a dualistic ontology of structure and agency. This reply addresses Stueber’s criticisms to re-affirm the ontology of social relations against ontological dualism.
Barnes, B.1988. The nature of power. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
2.
Bloor, D.1997. Wittgenstein, rules and institutions. London: Routledge.
3.
Collins, R.2000. The sociology of philosophies. London: Belknap.
4.
Collins, R. Forthcoming. The sociology of violence.
5.
Durkheim, É. 1976. The elementary forms of the religious life, trans. J. Ward Swain. London: Allen and Unwin.
6.
Giddens, A.1995. The constitution of society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
7.
Janowitz, M., and E. Shils. 1975. Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II. In Military conflict, edited by M. Janowitz. London: Sage.
8.
King, A.1999. Against structure: A critique of morphogenetic social theory. Sociological Review47 (2): 199-227.
9.
King, A.2006. The word of command: Cohesion and communication in the military. Armed Forces and Society32 (3): 1-20.
10.
Kripke, S.1982. Wittgenstein on rules and private language: An elementary exposition. Oxford: Blackwell.
11.
Milgram, S.1974. Obedience to authority. London: Pinter and Martin.
12.
Preece, S.2004. Among the Marines. Edinburgh, UK: Mainstream.
13.
Sawyer, K.2005. Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Stueber, K.2005. How to think about rules and rule-following. Philosophy of the Social Sciences35 (3): 307-323.
15.
Stueber, K.2006. How to structure a social theory? A critical response to Anthony King’s The Structure of Social Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences36(1): 95-104.
16.
Wittgenstein, L.1976. Philosophical investigations, trans. G. Anscombe. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
