Some anthropologists advocate going back to Boas’s anthropology to retrieve his sense of the individual and agency, among other things. Such a “psycho-logical Boas” could only exist in his holistic works. Elsewhere, I argued in a very synthetic way that Boas’s ethnography was not holistic. Here, I move a step further; perusing the very texts that famous commentators have singled out to prove Boas’s holism, I discover no holism; I find history as mere movement in space, and no individual agents; hence, no real psychology or agency. I only discern cultural fragments randomly assembling to form regional cultures.
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at large. Public Worlds 1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
Bashkow, Ira. 2004. A neo-Boasian conception of cultural boundaries. American Anthropologist106:443-458.
3.
Bashkow, Ira, Matti Bunzl, Richard Handler, Andrew Orta, and Daniel Rosenblatt. 2004. A new Boasian anthropology theory for the twenty-first century. American Anthropologist106:433-434.
4.
Benedict, Ruth. 1934. Patterns of culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
Benedict, Ruth. 1943. Franz Boas as ethnologist. American Anthropologist45:27-34.
6.
Berman, Judith. 1996. “The culture as it appears to the Indian himself”—Boas, George Hunt, and the methods of ethnography. In Volkgeist as method and ethic, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 215-256. History of Anthropology Series 8. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7.
Boas, Franz. [1887a] 1940. The study of geography. In Race, language and culture, edited by Franz Boas, 639-647. New York: Free Press.
8.
Boas, Franz. [1887b] 1974. The principles of ethnological classification. In The shaping of American anthropology, 1883-1911: A Franz Boas reader, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 67-71. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Boas, Franz. [1891] 1940. Dissemination of tales among the natives of North America. In Race, language and culture, edited by Franz Boas, 437-445. New York: Free Press.
10.
Boas, Franz. 1897. The social organization and the secret societies of the Kwakiutl Indians. Report of the U.S. National Museum for 1895. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
11.
Boas, Franz. [1898] 1974. The mythology of the Bella Coola Indians. In The shaping of American anthropology, 1883-1911: A Franz Boas reader, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 148-155. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Boas, Franz. [1899] 1974. Fieldwork for the British Association, 1888-1897. In The shaping of American anthropology, 1883-1911: A Franz Boas reader, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 88-107. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Boas, Franz. [1902] 1940. The ethnological significance of esoteric doctrines. In Race, language and culture, edited by Franz Boas, 312-315. New York: Free Press.
14.
Boas, Franz. [1904] 1974. The history of anthropology. In The shaping of American anthropology, 1883-1911: A Franz Boas reader, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 23-26. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Boas, Franz. [1914] 1940. Mythology and folk-tales of the North American Indians. In Race, language and culture, edited by Franz Boas, 451-490. New York: Free Press.
16.
Boas, Franz. 1916. Tsimshian mythology. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology, Thirty-first Annual Report.
17.
Boas, Franz. [1920] 1940. The social organization of the Kwakiutl. In Race, language and culture, edited by Franz Boas, 356-369. New York: Free Press.
18.
Boas, Franz. [1925] 1940. Stylistic aspects of primitive literature. In Race, language and culture, edited by Franz Boas, 491-502. New York: Free Press.
19.
Boas, Franz. 1935. Kwakiutl culture as reflected in mythology. New York: American Folklore Society.
20.
Briggs, Charles, and Richard Bauman. 1999. “The foundation of all future researches”: Franz Boas, George Hunt, native American texts, and the construction of modernity. American Quarterly51:479-528.
21.
Browne, Janet. 1983. The secular ark: Studies in the history of biogeography. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Buettner-Janusch, John. 1957. Boas and Mason: Particularism versus generalization. American Anthropologist59:318-324.
23.
Bunzl, Matti. 1996. Franz Boas and the Humboldtian tradition. In Volkgeist as method and ethic, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 17-78. History of Anthropology Series 8. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
24.
Bunzl, Matti. 2004. Boas, Foucault, and the “Native Anthropologist”: Notes toward a neo-Boasian anthropology. American Anthropologist106:435-442.
25.
Codere, Helen. 1959. The understanding of the Kwakiutl. In The anthropology of Franz Boas, edited by Walter Goldschmidt, 61-75. American Anthropologist, vol. 61, memoir 89. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
26.
Darnell, Regna. 2001. Invisible genealogies: A history of Americanist anthropology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
27.
Durkheim, Émile. [1912] 1990. Les formes élémentaire de la vie religieuse. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
28.
Foucault, Michel. 1966. Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.
29.
Handler, Richard. 1990. Boasian anthropology and the critique of American culture. American Quarterly42:252-273.
30.
Handler, Richard. 2004. Afterword: Mysteries of culture. American Anthropologist106:488-494.
31.
Harris, Marvin. 1968. The rise of anthropological theory. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
32.
Hinsley, Curtis M. Jr. 1981. From culture history to culture areas: Anthropology in the U.S. National Museum, 1881-1908. In Savages and scientists: The Smithsonian Institution and the development of American anthropology, 1846-1910, 83-123. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
33.
Hitchens, Janine. 1994. Critical implications of Franz Boas’ theory and methodology. Dialectical Anthropology19:237-253.
34.
Ingold, Tim. 2001. Reply to Lewis, Herbert S. Boas, Darwin, and anthropology. Current Anthropology42:396-398.
35.
Jacknis, Ira. 1985. Franz Boas and exhibits: On the limitations of the museum method in anthropology. In Objects and others: Essays on museums and material culture, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 75-111. History of Anthropology Series 3. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
36.
Jacknis, Ira. 1996. The ethnographic object and the object of ethnology in the early career of Franz Boas. In Volkgeist as method and ethic, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 185-214. History of Anthropology Series 8. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
37.
Jacob, François. 1970. La logique du vivant. Paris: Gallimard.
38.
Kluckhohn, Clyde, and Olaf Prufer. 1959. Influence during the formative years. In The anthropology of Franz Boas, edited by Walter Goldschmidt, 4-28. American Anthropological Association, vol. 61, memoir 89. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
39.
Kroeber, Alfred L.1917. The superorganic. American Anthropologist19:163-213.
40.
Lenclud, Gérard. 1991. Fonctionnalisme. In Dictionnaire de l’ethnologie et de l’anthropologie, edited by Pierre Bonte and Michel Izard, 286-89. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
41.
Lewis, Herbert S.2001. Boas, Darwin, science, and anthropology. Current Anthropology42:381-394.
Lowie, Robert. 1937. The history of ethnological theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
44.
Mason, Otis M.1887. The occurrence of similar inventions in areas widely apart. Science9:534-535.
45.
Mason, Otis T.1886. Resemblances in areas widely separated. American Naturalist20:246-251.
46.
Morgan, Lewis H.1877. Ancient society. Chicago: Kerr.
47.
Orta, Andrew. 2004. The promise of particularism and the theology of culture: Limits and lessons of “neo-Boasianism.”American Anthropologist106:473-487.
48.
Powell, Wesley J.1887. Museums of ethnology and their classification. Science9:612-614.
49.
Rosenblatt, Daniel. 2004. An anthropology made safe for culture: Patterns of practice and the politics of difference in Ruth Benedict. American Anthropologist106:459-472.
50.
Spier, Leslie. 1931. Historical interrelation of culture traits: Franz Boas’ study of Tsimshian mythology. In Methods in social science, edited by S. A. Rice, 449-457. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Spier, Leslie. 1959. Some central elements in the legacy. In The anthropology of Franz Boas, edited by Walter Goldschmidt, 146-156. American Anthropological Association, vol. 61, memoir 89. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
52.
Stocking, George W. Jr. [1968a] 1982. From physics to ethnology. In Race, culture and evolution: Essays in the history of anthropology, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 133-160. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Stocking, George W. Jr. [1968b] 1982. Franz Boas and the culture concept in historical perspective. In Race, culture and evolution: Essays in the history of anthropology, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 195-233. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
Stocking, George W. Jr. 1974a. Introduction: The basic assumptions of Boasian anthropology. In The shaping of American anthropology, 1883-1911: A Franz Boas reader, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 1-20. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
Stocking, George W. Jr. 1974b. Folklore and the critique of evolutionism. In The shaping of American anthropology, 1883-1911: A Franz Boas reader, edited by George W. Stocking Jr., 129-130. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
Verdon, Michel. n.d. Franz Boas: Cultural history for the present, or natural history? Manuscript submitted.
57.
Voget, Fred W.1975. A history of ethnology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
58.
Wax, Murray. 1956. The limitations of Boas’ anthropology. American Anthropologist58:63-74.
59.
White, Leslie. 1963. The ethnography and ethnology of Franz Boas. Bulletin of the Texas Memorial Museum. Austin: Texas Memorial Museum.
60.
Wissler, Clark. [1917] 1922. The American Indian. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
Zimmerman, Andrew. 2001. Anthropology and antihumanism in imperial Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
