According to many, joint intentional action must be understood in terms of joint intentions. Most accounts of joint intention appeal to a set of sophisticated individual intentional states. The author argues that standard accounts of joint intention exclude the possibility of joint action in young children because they presuppose that the participants have a robust theory of mind, something young children lack. But young children do engage in joint action. The author offers a revision of Michael Bratman’s analysis of joint intention that reflects the socio-cognitive abilities young children do have. This revision makes sense of joint action among young children and equally well explains simple joint actions involving adults.
Baldwin, D., and L. Moses. 1994. Early understanding of referential intent and attentional focus: Evidence from language and emotion. In Children’s early understanding of mind: Origins and development, ed. C. Lewis and P. Mitchell, 133-156. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Bekoff, M.1977. Social communication in canids: Evidence for the evolution of a stereotyped mammalian display. Science197: 1097-1099.
Bratman, M.1999. Faces of intention: Selected essays on intention and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bretherton, I.1984. Representing the social world in symbolic play: Reality and fantasy. In Symbolic play, ed. I. Bretherton, 3-41. New York: Academic Press.
8.
Campos, J.1980. Human emotions: Their new importance and their role in social referencing. Research and Clinical Center for Child Development Annual Report, pp. 1-7.
9.
Cooper R., and R. Aslin. 1989. The language environment of the young infant: Implications for early perceptual development. Canadian Journal of Psychology43:247-265.
10.
Davidson, D.1974. 1984. Truth and interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Flavell, J., E. Flavell, and F. Green. 1983. Development of the appearance/reality distinction. Cognitive Psychology15:95-120.
12.
Flavell, J., E. Flavell, and F. Green. 1995. Young children’s knowledge about thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development60 (1): Serial no. 243.
13.
Flavell, J., E. Flavell, F. Green, and D. Wilcox. 1980. Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: The effect of observer’s distance from target or clarity of perception of target. Developmental Psychology16:10-12.
14.
Gergely, G., Z. Nadasdy, G. Csibra, and S. Biro. 1995. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition56 (2): 165-193.
15.
Gilbert, M.1989. On social facts. London: Routledge.
Gilbert, M.2003. The structure of the social atom: Joint commitment as the foundation of human social behavior. In Socializing metaphysics, ed. Frederick Schmitt. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
19.
Gopnik, A., and J. Astington. 1988. Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development59:26-57.
20.
Gopnik, A., and V. Slaughter. 1991. Young children’s understanding of changes in their mental states. Child Development62:98-110.
21.
Goswami, U.2002. Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
Lewis, D.1969. Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Lillard, A.1993. Pretend play skills and the child’s theory of mind. Child Development64:348-371.
24.
Lillard, A.1998. Wanting to be it: Children’s understanding of intentions underlying pretense. Child Development69:979-991.
25.
Lillard, A.2001. Pretending, understanding pretense, and understanding mind. Play and Cultural Studies3:230-255.
26.
Lillard, A., and J. Flavell. 1992. Young children’s understanding of different mental states. Developmental Psychology28:626-634.
27.
Lillard, A., D. Witherington, and A. Robinette. 2001. How mother’s toddler directed pretense acts differ from the real acts. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
28.
Meijers, A.2003. Can collective intentionality be individualized?American Journal of Economics and Sociology62:167-193.
29.
Meltzoff, A.1995. Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology31:838-850.
30.
Meltzoff, A., and M. Moore. 1994. Imitation, memory, and the representation of persons. Infant Behavioral Development17:83-89.
Moses, L.1993. Young children’s understanding of belief constrains on intention. Cognitive Development8:1-25.
33.
Mumme, D. L., A. Fernald, and C. Herrera. 1996. Infant’s responses to facial and vocal emotional signals in a social referencing paradigm. Child Development67:3219-3237.
34.
Nichols, S., and S. Stich. 2000. A cognitive theory of pretense. Cognition74:115-147.
35.
Peacocke, C. 2002. Joint attention: Its nature, reflexivity and relation to common knowledge. Presented at the NEH Summer Institute on Consciousness and Intentionality, in Santa Cruz, CA.
36.
Rakoczy, H., M. Tomasello, and T. Striano. 2004. Young children know that trying is not pretending—A test of the “behaving-as-if” construal of children’s early concept of “pretense.”Developmental Psychology40 (3): 388-399.
37.
Rizzolatti, G., L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, and V. Gallese. 2002. From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations. In The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases, ed. W. Prinz and A. Meltzoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Sarach, O., and B. Spodex, eds. 1998. Multiple perspectives on play in early childhood education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
Schiffer, S.1972. Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Searle, J.1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Searle, J.1990. Collective intentions and actions. In Intentions in communication, ed. P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollack, 401-415. Cambrige, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Searle, J.1995. The construction of social reality. New York: Penguin.
43.
Stoutland, F.1997. Why are philosophers of action so anti-social? In Commonality and particularity in ethics, ed. Lilli Alanen, Sara Heinamaa, and Thomas Wallgreen. New York: St. Martin’s.
44.
Tollefsen, D.2002a. Collective intentionality and the social sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences32 (1): 25-50.
45.
Tollefsen, D.2002b. Organizationsastrue believers. Journal of Social Philosophy33(3):395-411.
46.
Tollefsen, D.2004. Joint attention and Searle’s primitive. Manuscript.
47.
Tomasello, M.1995. Joint attention as social cognition. In Joint attention: Its origins and role in development, ed. C. Moore and P. Dunham, 103-130. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
Tuomela, R.1993. What is cooperation?Erkenntnis38:87-101.
49.
Tuomela, R.1995. The importance of us: A philosophical study of basic social notions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50.
Tuomela, R., and K. Miller. 1988. We-intentions. Philosophical Studies53:367-389.
51.
Wellman, H. M.1993. Early understanding of mind: The normal case. In Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism, ed. S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, and D. Cohen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Wellman, H. M., and J. D. Woolley. 1990. From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition35:245-275.
53.
Woodward, A. L.1998. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition69 (1): 1-34.
