Donald Davidson, and others, have sometimes claimed that the subject matter of social science properly consists only of intentional actions. The author disputes this claim and explores an example drawn from social psychology that shows that some social scientific phenomena cannot be explained unless they are redescribed in nonintentional language.
Brock, T., and L. Grant. 1963. Dissonance, awareness, and motivation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology67 (1): 53-60.
2.
Davidson, D.1982. Psychology as philosophy. In Essays on actions and events. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
3.
McIntyre, L.1996. Laws and explanation in the social sciences: Defending a science of human behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview.
4.
McIntyre, L.1999. Davidson and social scientific laws. Synthese120:375-394.
5.
Rorty, R.1983. Method and morality. In Social science as moral inquiry, edited by Norma Haan, 155-176. New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
Taylor, C.1971. Interpretation andthe sciences of man. Review of Metaphysics25 (1): 3-51.
7.
Von Wright, G. H.1971. Explanation and understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
Winch, P.1958. The idea of a social science. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
9.
Brock, T.1968. Dissonance without awareness. In Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook, edited by R. Abelson et al., 408-416. Chicago: Rand McNally.
10.
Davidson, D.1982. Mental events. In Essays on actions and events. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
11.
Fay, B.1975. Social theory and political practice. London: George Allen and Unwin.
12.
Hayek, F. A.1967. The results ofhumanaction but not ofhumandesign. In Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Henderson, D.1993. Interpretation and explanation in the human sciences. Albany: SUNY Press.
14.
Horgan, T., and J. Tienson. 1990. Soft laws. Midwest Studies in Philosophy15:256-279.
15.
Kim, J.1989. Mechanism, purpose, and explanatory exclusion. In Philosophical perspectives, edited by J. Tomberlin, Vol. 3, 77-108. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
16.
Little, D.1990. Varieties of social explanation. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Nisbett, R., and T. Wilson. 1977. Telling more thanwe can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review84:231-259.
18.
Roth, P.1987. Meaning and method in the social sciences: Acase for methodological pluralism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
