Digital nomadism is rapidly reshaping global mobility and technology-enabled forms of work, generating both new opportunities and complex social, economic, and sustainability challenges for host communities. This study examines the role of agency activation in digital nomadism, focusing on how transient professionals navigate institutional constraints, engage with local communities, and contribute to or disrupt sustainable development and social change. Grounded in Agency Theory and informed by concepts of bounded agency, the research analyses the interaction between individual autonomy, institutional conditions, and socio-cultural dynamics. Using a participatory action research approach, the study investigates an Australian digital nomad community in Southeast Asia, where a co-working space was established as a hub for cross-cultural collaboration and skill-sharing, and community engagement. Data were collected through focus groups, semi-structured interviews, and field observations, and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings reveal four interconnected dimensions of agency activation: community integration, cultural exchange, socio-economic impacts, and ethical engagement. While digital nomads contribute through knowledge exchange, entrepreneurship support, and inclusive community initiatives, they also inadvertently intensify gentrification, cultural commodification, and social inequalities. The study advances debates on sustainable digital nomadism by linking theoretical insights with practical implications. It calls for balanced regulatory frameworks, ethical engagement strategies, and multi-stakeholder collaboration to ensure digital nomadism supports inclusive and socially responsible development.
BednorzJ. (2024). Working from anywhere? Work from here! Approaches to attract digital nomads. Annals of Tourism Research, 105, 103715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103715
ChevtaevaE.Denizci-GuilletB. (2021). Digital nomads’ lifestyles and coworkation. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 21, 100633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100633
5.
ChevtaevaE.NeuhoferB.EggerR.RainoldiM. (2024). Travel while working remotely: A topological data analysis of well-being in remote work trip experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 63(2), 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231151923
6.
ChilisaB. (2019). Indigenous research methodologies (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
7.
CookD. (2023). What is a digital nomad? Definition and taxonomy in the era of mainstream remote work. World Leisure Journal, 65(2), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2023.2190608
8.
de LorynB. (2022). Not necessarily a place: How mobile transnational online workers (digital nomads) construct and experience ‘home’. Global Networks, 22(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12333
9.
DuyganM.StauffacherM.MeylanG. (2019). A heuristic for conceptualizing and uncovering the determinants of agency in socio-technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, 13–29.
EmirbayerM.MischeA. (1998). What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
12.
EvansK. (2007). Concepts of hermeneutical agency in education, work, and the personal lives of young adults. International Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590600991237
GretzelU.SigalaM.XiangZ.KooC. (2020). E-Tourism beyond COVID-19: A call for transformative research. Information Technology & Tourism, 22, 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-020-00181-3
17.
GuptaS.JaiswalR.GuptaS. K. (2024). Digital nomads: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Tourism Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-12-2023-0869
HannonenO. (2023). Emergent geographies of digital nomadism: conceptual framing, insights and implications for tourism. Tourism Geographies, 1–11.
20.
HannonenO. (2024). Digital Nomadism and Tourism Mobilities. In The Routledge Handbook of Tourism Geographies (pp. 332–343). Routledge.
21.
HannonenO.QuintanaT. A.LehtoX. Y. (2023). A supplier side view of digital nomadism: The case of destination Gran Canaria. Tourism Management, 97, 104744.
JiwasiddiA.SchlagweinD.CahalaneM.Cecez-KecmanovicD.LeongC.RacthamP. (2024). Digital nomadism as a new part of the visitor economy: The case of the “digital nomad capital” Chiang Mai, Thailand. Information Systems Journal, 34(5), 1493–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12496
KemmisS.McTaggartR. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). Sage.
26.
KleistN.BjarnesenJ. (2023). Mediating Mobility in West Africa: Improvisation, Culture, and Volatility in Migration Infrastructures. International Migration Review, 59(4), 1747–1771. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183231205563.
27.
LacárcelF. J. S.HueteR.ZervaK. (2024). Decoding digital nomad destination decisions through user-generated content. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123098
28.
LimW. M. (2021). Toward an agency and reactance theory of crowding: Insights from COVID-19 and the tourism industry. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(5), 1232–1242. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1926
MancinelliF. (2020). Digital nomads: freedom, responsibility and the neoliberal order. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(3), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-020-00174-2
31.
MancinelliF.Germann MolzJ. (2024). Moving with and against the state: Digital nomads and frictional mobility regimes. Mobilities, 19(2), 189–207.
32.
McKennaB.CaiW.TuunanenT. (2024). Transforming to a sustainable visitor economy with information systems. Information Systems Journal, Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12573
33.
MiocevicD.KockF. (2025). Socio-cultural adaptation in cross-cultural transitions of digital nomads: A self-discrepancy view. Tourism Management, 109, 105153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105153
34.
MiocevicD. (2025). Baby come back: Resident-digital nomad conflicts, destination identification, and revisit intention. Journal of Travel Research, 64(3), 696–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105153
35.
Sánchez-VergaraJ. I.OrelM.CapdevilaI. (2023). “Home office is the here and now.” Digital nomad visa systems and remote work-focused leisure policies. World Leisure Journal, 65(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2023.2165142
36.
SchlagweinD.JarrahiM. H. (2020). The mobilities of digital work: The case of digital nomadism. In ECIS.
37.
StercheleD. (2020). Memorable tourism experiences and their consequences: An interaction ritual (IR) theory approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 81, 102879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102879
38.
ShellerM.UrryJ. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
39.
ThompsonB. Y. (2019a). The digital nomad lifestyle:(remote) work/leisure balance, privilege, and constructed community. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 2(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-018-00030-y
40.
ThompsonB.Y. (2019b). ‘I get my lovin’ on the run’: Digital Nomads, Constant Travel, and Nurturing Romantic Relationships. In: NashC. J.Gorman-MurrayA. (eds) The Geographies of Digital Sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6876-9_5
41.
TranL. T.VuT. T. P. (2017). ‘Agency in mobility’: towards a conceptualisation of international student agency in transnational mobility. Educational Review, 70(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1293615
42.
XiaoY.LutzC. (2025). Wayfarers in cyberspace: A temporal investigation of digital nomads based on liquid modernity theory. Journal of Travel Research, 64(4), 966–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231224242
43.
XuJ.SuT.ChengX.ChenH. (2024). Exploring the destination network in the context of tourism mobility: a multi-scale analytical framework. Current Issues in Tourism, 28(8), 1197–1219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2334830
44.
YoungA. G. (2018). Using ICT for social good: Cultural identity restoration through emancipatory pedagogy. Information Systems Journal, 28(2), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12142
45.
ZhaoX. (2025). Exploring Mobility: An Analysis Within the 'Structure and Agency’ Framework. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 83, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2024.20758
