The joint impact of message features and framing in tourism emergency communication on social media remains underexplored. This study investigates how content richness and sentiment tendency influence the effectiveness of official tourism emergency response information on social media, moderated by Promotion, Action, and Evaluation frames. A total of 3,853 official response posts from two real cases on Weibo were collected via web scraping and analyzed using content analysis, natural language processing, and regression modeling. Results show content richness increases reposts, comments, and positive feedback but not likes, while sentiment tendency drives likes. The Promotion Frame boosts the impact of content richness on comments; the Action Frame reduces its effect on reposts and comments; and the Evaluation Frame increases likes and positive feedback. This study refines the application of framing theory by illustrating how frame and content features interact to shape user engagement during tourism emergencies.
AhmadM.WidodoP.UtomoS. T.KusumaK. (2024). The efforts of Lombok regency government to recovery after the 2018 Lombok earthquake disaster. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 3(5), 2814–2823. http://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i5.1024
2.
AldamenY.HacimicE. (2023). Positive determinism of Twitter usage development in crisis communication: Rescue and relief efforts after the 6 February 2023 earthquake in Türkiye as a case study. Social Sciences, 12(8), 436.
3.
AlhoutiS.WrightS. A.BakerT. L. (2019). Responding to service failures with prevention framed donations. The Journal of Services Marketing, 33(5), 547–556. http://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-09-2018-0263
4.
AnnamalaiB.YoshidaM.VarshneyS.PathakA. A.VenugopalP. (2021). Social media content strategy for sport clubs to drive fan engagement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62, 102648. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102648
5.
BaduJ.KrukeB. I.SaetrenG. B. (2023). Crisis communication and trustworthiness among crisis actors: Towards a typology of crisis management difficulties. Safety in Extreme Environments People, Risk and Security, 5(2), 119–130. http://doi.org/10.1007/s42797-023-00074-8
6.
BanerjeeD.MeenaK. S. (2021). COVID-19 as an “infodemic” in public health: Critical role of the social media. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 610623. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.610623
7.
BeckenS.HugheyK. F. D. (2013). Linking tourism into emergency management structures to enhance disaster risk reduction. Tourism Management, 36, 77–85.
8.
BetusA. E.KearnsE. M.LemieuxA. F. (2021). How perpetrator identity (sometimes) influences media framing attacks as “terrorism” or “mental illness”. Communication Research, 48(8), 1133–1156. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220971142
9.
BhattacharyyaJ.BalajiM. S.JiangY. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of environmental sustainability performance communication in tourism: Mediation and moderation effects. Journal of Travel Research, 63(8), 1933–1952. http://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231206548
10.
BotterillL. C.LakeJ.WalshM. J. (2021). Factors affecting public responses to health messages during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: Partisanship, values, and source credibility. Australian Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 358–375. http://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2021.1978389
11.
BullockO. M.ShulmanH. C. (2021). Utilizing framing theory to design more effective health messages about tanning behavior among college women. Communication Studies, 72(3), 319–332. http://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2021.1899007
12.
ChandrasekaranS.RVS.AnnamalaiB. (2023). Social media and tourism: A cross-platform study of Indian DMOs. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(16), 2727–2744. http://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2142098
13.
CheS.KimJ. H. (2024). Sentiment impact of public health agency communication strategies on TikTok under COVID-19 normalization: Deep learning exploration. Journal of Public Health, 32(8), 1559–1570. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-01921-5
14.
ChenQ.MinC.ZhangW.WangG.MaX.EvansR. (2020). Unpacking the black box: How to promote citizen engagement through government social media during the COVID-19 crisis. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106380. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106380
15.
ChenQ.ZhangY.LiuH.ZhangW.EvansR. (2023). Dialogic communication on local government social media during the first wave of COVID-19: Evidence from the health commissions of prefecture-level cities in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 143, 107715. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107715
16.
ChengZ.LiY. (2024). Like, comment, and share on TikTok: Exploring the effect of sentiment and second-person view on the user engagement with TikTok news videos. Social Science Computer Review, 42(1), 201–223. http://doi.org/10.1177/08944393231178603
17.
ChongD.DruckmanJ. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x
18.
ChristofC.Nußbaumer-StreitB.GartlehnerG. (2019). Communicating risk in public health emergencies: A WHO guideline for emergency risk communication (Erc) policy and practice. Gesundheitswesen, 81(10), 846. http://doi.org/10.1055/a-0887-4545
19.
CinelliM.QuattrociocchiW.GaleazziA.ValensiseC. M.BrugnoliE.SchmidtA. L.ZolaP.ZolloF.ScalaA. (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 16598. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
20.
CuiH.KertészJ. (2023). “Born in Rome” or “Sleeping Beauty”: Emergence of hashtag popularity on the Chinese microblog Sina Weibo. Physica a-Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 619, 128724. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128724
21.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
22.
de VriesL.GenslerS.LeeflangP. S. H. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83–91. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003
23.
DongX.LianY. (2022). The moderating effects of entertainers on public engagement through government activities in social media during the COVID-19. Telematics and Informatics, 66, 101746. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101746
24.
DouY.SunX.JiA.WangY.XueX. (2023). Development strategy for prefabricated construction projects: A tripartite evolutionary game based on prospect theory. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 30(1), 105–124. http://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2021-0455
25.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
26.
FeezellJ. T.GlazierR. A.BoydstunA. E. (2021). Framing, identity, and responsibility: Do episodic vs. thematic framing effects vary by target population?Politics, Groups & Identities, 9(2), 347–368. http://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1584751
27.
FengY.ZhouW. (2022). Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study based on a large geo-tagged COVID-19 Twitter dataset (UsaGeoCov19). Information Processing & Management, 59(2), 102820. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102820
28.
FissiS.GoriE.RomoliniA. (2022). Social media government communication and stakeholder engagement in the era of Covid-19: Evidence from Italy. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(3), 276–293. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2021-0145
29.
FortinD. R.DholakiaR. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387–396. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00106-1
30.
FuC.PengC.LiuX.YangL. T.YangJ.HanL. (2019). Search engine: The social relationship driving power of internet of things. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92, 972–986. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.01.037
31.
Gálvez-RodríguezM. D. M.Haro-de-RosarioA.García-TabuyoM.Caba-PérezC. (2019). Building online citizen engagement for enhancing emergency management in local European government: The case of the November 2015 Paris attacks. Online Information Review, 43(2), 219–238. http://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2016-0286
32.
GanJ.ShiS.FilieriR.LeungW. K. S. (2023). Short video marketing and travel intentions: The interplay between visual perspective, visual content, and narration appeal. Tourism Management (1982), 99, 104795. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104795
33.
GrimmelikhuijsenS.JohnP.MeijerA.WorthyB. (2019). Do freedom of information laws increase transparency of government? A replication of a field experiment. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(1), 1–10. http://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.12.34
34.
HanX.WangJ. (2022). Modelling and analyzing the semantic evolution of social media user behaviors during disaster events: A case study of COVID-19. Isprs International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(7), 373. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11070373
35.
HanssonS.PageR. (2023). Legitimation in government social media communication: The case of the Brexit department. Critical Discourse Studies, 20(4), 361–378. http://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2058971
36.
HarrisonS.JohnsonP. (2019). Challenges in the adoption of crisis crowdsourcing and social media in Canadian emergency management. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 501–509. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.04.002
37.
HendhanaS.DarmaG. S.MahyuniL. P.MaradonaA. F. (2024). How can tourism achieve long-term resilience after crises and disruptions? Crisis management model. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 5(3), 600–612. http://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v5i3.1105
38.
HuangJ.YangJ. Z.ChuH. (2022). Framing climate change impacts as moral violations: The pathway of perceived message credibility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5210. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095210
39.
IslamK.AkhtherN.SeegerM. W. (2023). Variability in media content of public health outbreak coverage: A crisis communication approach. Communication Studies, 74(2), 113–130. http://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2183516
40.
IttefaqM.ZainA.ArifR.Ala-UddinM.AhmadT.IqbalA. (2025). Global news media coverage of artificial intelligence (AI): A comparative analysis of frames, sentiments, and trends across 12 countries. Telematics and Informatics, 96, 102223. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102223
41.
JinD. (2024). Humanizing metaverse: Psychological involvement and masstige value in retail versus tourism platforms. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2), n/a–n/a. http://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13025
42.
KankanamgeN.YigitcanlarT.GoonetillekeA. (2020). How engaging are disaster management related social media channels? The case of Australian state emergency organisations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 48, 101571. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101571
KimJ.WangY.MaL.ChathamA. (2022). Engaging the public in disaster communication: The effect of message framing on sharing intentions for social media posts. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 16(4), 649–662. http://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2033979
46.
KimS.LeeK. Y.ShinS. I.YangS. (2017). Effects of tourism information quality in social media on destination image formation: The case of Sina Weibo. Information & Management, 54(6), 687–702. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.02.009
47.
KimY. (2016). Understanding publics’ perception and behaviors in crisis communication: Effects of crisis news framing and publics’ acquisition, selection, and transmission of information in crisis situations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(1), 35–50. http://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2015.1131697
48.
KitazawaK.HaleS. A. (2021). Social media and early warning systems for natural disasters: A case study of Typhoon Etau in Japan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 52, 101926. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101926
49.
KuipersS.SchonheitM. (2022). Data breaches and effective crisis communication: A comparative analysis of corporate reputational crises. Corporate Reputation Review, 25(3), 176–197. http://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00121-9
50.
LeeS. A.LeeM.JeongM. (2021). The role of virtual reality on information sharing and seeking behaviors. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 46, 215–223. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.12.010
51.
LiK.ZhouC.LuoX. R.BenitezJ.LiaoQ. (2022). Impact of information timeliness and richness on public engagement on social media during COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical investigation based on NLP and machine learning. Decision Support Systems, 162, 113752. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2022.113752
52.
LiZ.WangM.ZhongJ.RenY. (2022). Improving the communication and credibility of government media in response to public health emergencies: Analysis of tweets from the WeChat official accounts of 10 Chinese health commissioners. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 900776. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.900776
53.
LiuM.ZhangZ.LeeJ. S. Y. (2024). Verb frame distribution and text difficulty: A corpus-based analysis of verb frames in Chinese textbooks. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 621–641. http://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12511
54.
LiuW.XuW. W.TsaiJ. J. (2020). Developing a multi-level organization-public dialogic communication framework to assess social media-mediated disaster communication and engagement outcomes. Public Relations Review, 46(4), 101949. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101949
55.
Liu-LastresB. (2022). Beyond simple messaging: A review of crisis communication research in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(5), 1959–1983. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2021-1404
56.
LuY.QiuJ. (2024). Influence of cognitive and emotional frames on Weibo users’ information dissemination behavior in natural disaster emergencies: The moderating effect of psychological distance. Library & Information Science Research, 46(2), 101298. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2024.101298
57.
LuY.QiuJ.JinC.GuW.DouS. (2022). The influence of psychological language words contained in microblogs on dissemination behaviour in emergency situations—mediating effects of emotional responses. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(6), 1337–1356. http://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1886325
58.
LukyanovaG. V.MartyanovD. S. (2021). Communication Strategies of Emotional Engagement on Social Media. 2021 Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS), Petersburg, Russia. https://go.exlibris.link/c6RvmfF5
59.
LuoH.MengX.ZhaoY.CaiM. (2023). Rise of social bots: The impact of social bots on public opinion dynamics in public health emergencies from an information ecology perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 85, 102051. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102051
60.
LynchK. A.AbramsonD. M.MerdjanoffA. A. (2024). The influence of risk perception on disaster recovery: A case study of new Jersey families impacted by hurricane sandy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 100, 104220. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104220
61.
MorakabatiY.PageS. J.FletcherJ. (2017). Emergency management and tourism stakeholder responses to crises: A global survey. Journal of Travel Research, 56(3), 299–316. http://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516641516
62.
MoranG.MuzellecL.JohnsonD. (2020). Message content features and social media engagement: Evidence from the media industry. The Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(5), 533–545. http://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2018-2014
63.
MotaharP. S.TavakoliR.MuraP. (2024). Social media influencers’ visual framing of Iran on YouTube. Tourism Recreation Research, 49(2), 270–282. http://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2021.2014252
64.
NajafabadihaA.WangY.GholizadehA.JavanmardiE.ZameerH. (2025). Fostering consumer engagement in online shopping: Assessment of environmental video messages in driving purchase intentions toward green products. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123637. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123637
65.
NekliudovN. A.BlyussO.CheungK. Y.PetrouL.GenuneitJ.SushentsevN.LevadnayaA.ComberiatiP.WarnerJ. O.Tudor-WilliamsG.TeufelM.GreenhawtM.DunnGalvinA.MunblitD. (2020). Excessive media consumption about COVID-19 is associated with increased state anxiety: Outcomes of a large online survey in Russia. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), e20955. http://doi.org/10.2196/20955
66.
ParkD.KimW. G.ChoiS. (2019). Application of social media analytics in tourism crisis communication. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(15), 1810–1824. http://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2018.1504900
67.
PattisonA. B.ReinfeldeM.ChangH.ChowdhuryM.CohenE.MalahyS.O ConnorK.SellamiM.SmithK. L.StantonC. Y.VoetsB.WeiH. G. (2022). Finding the facts in an infodemic: Framing effective COVID-19 messages to connect people to authoritative content. Bmj Global Health, 7(2), e007582. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007582
68.
Pletikosa CvijikjI.MichahellesF. (2013). Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 843–861. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-013-0098-8
69.
PrabhakaranV.ReiM.ShutovaE. (2021). How metaphors impact political discourse: A large-scale topic-agnostic study using neural metaphor detection. Proceedings of the International Aaai Conference on Web and Social Media, 15, 503–512. http://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18079
70.
RibeiroB.HartleyS.NerlichB.JaspalR. (2018). Media coverage of the Zika crisis in Brazil: The construction of a ‘war’ frame that masked social and gender inequalities. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 200, 137–144. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.023
71.
RossiM.FerrucciP. (2024). Provoking gut-level reactions: A study on journalistic framing during the 2020 meatpacking crisis. Environmental Communication, 18(4), 390–405. http://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2280759
72.
RossmannC.MeyerL.SchulzP. J. (2018). The mediated amplification of a crisis: Communicating the A/H1N1 pandemic in press releases and press coverage in Europe. Risk Analysis, 38(2), 357–375. http://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12841
73.
RungeC. A.DaigleR. M.HausnerV. H.TangW. (2020). Quantifying tourism booms and the increasing footprint in the Arctic with social media data. Plos One, 15(1), e0227189. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227189
74.
SabateF.Berbegal-MirabentJ.CañabateA.LebherzP. R. (2014). Factors influencing popularity of branded content in Facebook fan pages. European Management Journal, 32(6), 1001–1011. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.05.001
75.
SauraJ. R.Palacios-MarquésD.Ribeiro-SorianoD. (2025). Privacy concerns in social media UGC communities: Understanding user behavior sentiments in complex networks. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 23(1), 125–145. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00631-5
76.
SchreinerM.FischerT.RiedlR. (2021). Impact of content characteristics and emotion on behavioral engagement in social media: Literature review and research agenda. Electronic Commerce Research, 21(2), 329–345. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-019-09353-8
77.
ShangY.LiouR.Rao-NicholsonR. (2022). What to say and how to say it? Corporate strategic communication through social media during the pandemic. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 16(4), 633–648. http://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2033980
78.
SheenG. C.TungH. H.WuW. (2021). Citizen journalism reduces the credibility deficit of authoritarian government in risk communication amid COVID-19 outbreaks. Plos One, 12(16), e0260961. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260961.eCollection2021
79.
SmithJ. M.van IerlandT. (2018). Framing controversy on social media: #NoDAPL and the debate about the Dakota access pipeline on Twitter. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(3), 226–241. http://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2018.2833753
80.
SoaresJ. C.LimongiR.CohenE. D. (2022). Engagement in a social media: An analysis in higher education institutions. Online Information Review, 46(2), 256–284. http://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2020-0242
81.
SuX.WangS.Rosak-SzyrockaJ. (2024). The impact and management of internet-based public opinion dissemination during emergencies: A case study of Baidu News during the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Plos One, 19(4), e0299374. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299374
82.
SuttonJ.GibsonC. B.PhillipsN. E.SpiroE. S.LeagueC.JohnsonB.FitzhughS. M.ButtsC. T. (2015). A cross-hazard analysis of terse message retransmission on Twitter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences—PNAS, 112(48), 14793–14798. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508916112
83.
TanJ.ChengM. (2025). Tourism, war, and media: The Russia-Ukraine war narrative. Journal of Travel Research, 64(5), 1031–1044. http://doi.org/10.1177/00472875241245047
84.
ThirumaranK.MohammadiZ.PourabedinZ.AzzaliS.SimK. (2021). COVID-19 in Singapore and New Zealand: Newspaper portrayal, crisis management. Tourism Management Perspectives, 38, 100812. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100812
85.
TianJ.MaJ. (2024). Online platform use and performance among listed tourism companies in China. Journal of Travel Research, 63(7), 1709–1723. http://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231197203
86.
UtzS.SchultzF.GlockaS. (2013). Crisis communication online: How medium, crisis type and emotions affected public reactions in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Public Relations Review, 39(1), 40–46. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.09.010
87.
Van WinkleC.CorriganS. (2022). Communicating on social media during a #FestivalEmergency. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 13(2), 144–163. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-06-2021-0054
88.
WangH.XiongL.XiaY.TangZ. R.ChenM. (2024). Unraveling the prerequisites of citizen engagement intentions initiated by mobile government social media during emergencies: An integrative dual SEM-ANN analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 110, 104636. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104636
WanglerJ.JanskyM. (2023). Media portrayal of old age and its effects on attitudes in older people: Findings from a series of studies. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 165–169. http://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01671-5
91.
WatiminN. H.ZanuddinH.RahamadM. S.YadegaridehkordiE.GurnaniB. (2023). Content framing role on public sentiment formation for pre-crisis detection on sensitive issue via sentiment analysis and content analysis. Plos One, 18(10), e0287367. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287367
92.
WuF.ChoyC. H. Y. (2018). Frames and framing effects in Chinese online and offline crisis communication: The case study of a celebrity scandal. Chinese Journal of Communication, 11(3), 324–343. http://doi.org/oi.org/10.1080/17544750.2018.1473265
93.
WuY.ShenX.SunY. (2023). Establishing the typology and the underlying structure of rumor-combating behaviors: A multidimensional scaling approach
94.
XuD.YanS.ZhangY.ZhangS.NakamoriY.ChenL. (2022). Knowledge management for extreme public health events COVID-19: Based on Tiktok data. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(9), 2354–2369. http://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2021-0450
95.
XueZ.LiQ.ZengX. (2023). Social media user behavior analysis applied to the fashion and apparel industry in the big data era. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 72, 103299. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103299
96.
YanY.EckleM.KuoC.HerfortB.FanH.ZipfA. (2017). Monitoring and assessing post-disaster tourism recovery using geotagged social media data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(5), 144. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6050144
97.
YangB.LiY.YanK.ChoiY.Bennett-JonesB. (2023). Analyzing U.S. State Governments’ COVID-19 homepages during the initial lockdown in March and April 2020: Information content and interactivity. Health Communication, 38(7), 1327–1337. http://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2007574
98.
Yaşar DinçerF. C.YirmibeşoğluG.NarinM.SaraçF. E. (2024). Crisis management and sustainability in tourism industry: Obstacles and recovery strategies after the COVID-19 crisis in Antalya, Türkiye. Sustainability, 16(12), 5121. http://doi.org/10.3390/su16125121
99.
YatesD.PaquetteS. (2011). Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 6–13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.001
100.
YinJ.QuX.NiY. (2024). The influence of tourism destination safety reminder information frame on tourists’ safety compliance behavior. Safety Science, 172, 106422. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106422
101.
YooC.YooE.YanL. L.Pedraza-MartinezA. (2024). Speak with one voice? Examining content coordination and social media engagement during disasters. Information Systems Research, 35(2), 551–569. http://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0121
102.
ZengZ.SunS.LiQ. (2023). Multimodal negative sentiment recognition of online public opinion on public health emergencies based on graph convolutional networks and ensemble learning. Information Processing & Management, 60(4), 103378. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103378
103.
ZhaiX.LuoQ. (2023). Rational or emotional? A study on Chinese tourism boycotts on social media during international crisis situations. Tourism Management Perspectives, 45, 101069. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2022.101069
104.
ZhangJ.XieC.ChenY.DaiY.Yi-JunW. (2023). The matching effect of destinations’ crisis communication. Journal of Travel Research, 62(3), 491–516. http://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211067548
105.
ZhangS.de JongM. D. T.GosseltJ. F. (2022). Twitter as a technical communication platform: How IT companies’ message characteristics relate to online engagement. Technical Communication, 69(2), 18-35.
106.
ZhangW.YuanH.ZhuC.ChenQ.EvansR. (2022). Does citizen engagement with government social media accounts differ during the different stages of public health crises? An empirical examination of the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 807459. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.807459
107.
ZhangY.ShanJ.YeZ. (2022). Government information dissemination during public health emergencies: An analysis of China’s experiences. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 748236. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.748236
108.
ZhongW.BroniatowskiD. A. (2023). Economic risk framing increases intention to vaccinate among Republican COVID-19 vaccine refusers. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 317, 115594. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115594
109.
ZhongW.HuQ.KapucuN. (2023). Robust crisis communication in turbulent times: Conceptualization and empirical evidence from the United States. Public Administration, 101(1), 158–181.
110.
ZhouA.LiuW.KimH. M.LeeE.ShinJ.ZhangY.Huang-IsherwoodK. M.DongC.YangA. (2024). Moral foundations, ideological divide, and public engagement with U.S. Government Agencies’ COVID-19 vaccine communication on social media. Mass Communication & Society, 27(4), 739–764. http://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2151919
111.
ZikargaeM. H. (2020). COVID-19 in Ethiopia: Assessment of how the Ethiopian government has executed administrative actions and managed risk communications and community engagement. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13, 2803–2810. http://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S278234
