Abstract
The role of humor-based and fear-based warning message appeals in tourism safety communication remains unclear. Drawing on three scenario-based experiments, this study investigates the mechanisms through which different types of warning message appeals influence tourists’ safety compliance. The results indicate that humor appeals exert a slightly stronger persuasive effect than fear appeals. Moreover, both rational and experiential thinking styles mediate the relationship between message appeal type and safety compliance. In addition, destination type (hedonic vs. utilitarian) moderates the effectiveness of warning message appeals. This study is the first to reveal the role of humor and fear appeals in tourism safety communication. It offers new perspectives for research on tourism warning messages and extends the application of cognitive-experiential self-theory in this field. Moreover, the findings provide practical guidance for destination management organizations in designing more persuasive and targeted warning messages to enhance tourists’ safety-related behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
