Abstract
Ethical voice shapes moral values and responsible behavior, yet its impact on cultural heritage conservation remains unexplored. Grounded in the approach–avoidance system, this study investigates the differential effects of ethical voice type (promotive vs. prohibitive) on tourists’ cultural heritage conservation commitment through four sub-studies. The findings reveal that promotive (vs. prohibitive) ethical voice is more effective in encouraging tourists’ conservation commitment. Specifically, promotive ethical voice enhances tourists’ perceived responsibility, motivating their conservation commitment, whereas prohibitive ethical voice evokes perceived emotional blackmail, leading to an avoidance of conservation commitment. Moreover, the effectiveness of ethical voice is moderated by perceived scarcity. For highly scarce cultural heritage, prohibitive (vs. promotive) ethical voice is more effective. This study offers a novel perspective on cultural heritage conservation, enriches the impact framework of ethical voice, and suggests that cultural heritage sites should fully leverage the positive role of ethical voice in fostering tourists’ conservation commitment.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
