Destination marketing is an image-oriented industry but understanding the complex nature of visual attention, destination attributes, and tourists’ emotions is challenging. Destination attributes can be represented by multiple types of cues embedded in destination pictures. Yet, perceived stress may also influence the relationship between visual attention and emotional responses to destination pictures. This study investigates the relationships between visual attention and emotions under multiple stimuli in both natural and built destination pictures and assesses these relationships among tourists with varying levels of perceived stress. Results indicate that soundscape stimuli increase tourists’ visual attention to natural elements and evoke positive emotions. Textual stimuli increase visual attention to built elements, but excessive textual stimuli distract visual attention from built elements. Visual attention to natural elements evokes tourists’ positive emotions, especially those with low perceived stress. Our findings enrich attention restoration theory and multiple resource theory and advance eye-tracking analytics in tourism research.
BarnesS. J.MattssonJ.SørensenF. (2014). Destination brand experience and visitor behavior: Testing a scale in the tourism context. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 121–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.06.002
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
3.
BasilM. D. (2012). Multiple resource theory. In SeelN. M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 2384–2385). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_25
4.
BasuA.DuvallJ.KaplanR. (2019). Attention restoration theory: Exploring the role of soft fascination and mental bandwidth. Environment and Behavior, 51(9–10), 1055–1081. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518774400
5.
BoermanS. C.SmitE. G.Van MeursL. (2011). Attention battle; the abilities of brand, visual, and text characteristics of the ad to draw attention versus the diverting power of the direct magazine context. In Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. 2) Breaking New Ground in Theory and Practice (pp. 295–310). Springer.
6.
BuxtonR. T.PearsonA. L.AllouC.FristrupK.WittemyerG. (2021). A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(14), e2013097118. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.2013097118
7.
CarrascoM. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51(13), 1484–1525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012
8.
CharnessG.GneezyU.KuhnM. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
9.
CohenJ. B.AreniC. S. (1991). Affect and consumer behavior. In RobertsonT. S.KassarjianH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 188–240). Prentice Hall.
10.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
11.
EssawyM. (2019). The impacts of e-atmospherics on emotions and on the booking intentions of hotel rooms. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 19(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358417692393
12.
GaoJ.KerstetterD. L.MowenA. J.HickersonB. (2018). Changes in tourists’ perception of well-being based on their use of emotion regulation strategies during vacation. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2017.1374908
13.
GaoY.ZhangT.ZhangW.MengH.ZhangZ. (2020). Research on visual behavior characteristics and cognitive evaluation of different types of forest landscape spaces. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 54, 126788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126788
14.
GoossensC. (2000). Tourism information and pleasure motivation. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(2), 301–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00067-5
15.
HosanyS.MartinD.WoodsideA. G. (2021). Emotions in tourism: Theoretical designs, measurements, analytics, and interpretations. Journal of Travel Research, 60(7), 1391–1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520937079
16.
HuangS.ShaoY.ZengY.LiuX.LiZ. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 on Chinese nationals’ tourism preferences. Tourism Management Perspectives, 40, 100895. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100895
17.
JordanE. J. (2015). Planning as a coping response to proposed tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 54(3), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513517425
18.
JordanE. J.SpencerD. M.PrayagG. (2019). Tourism impacts, emotions and stress. Annals of Tourism Research, 75, 213–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.01.011
19.
JordanE. J.PrayagG. (2021). Residents’ cognitive appraisals, emotions, and coping strategies at local dark tourism sites. Journal of Travel Research, 61(4), 887–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211004761
20.
KassnerM.PateraW.BullingA. (2014). Pupil: An open source platform for pervasive eye tracking and mobile gaze-based interaction [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, Seattle, Washington. https://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2641695
21.
KwortnikR. J.RossW. T. (2007). The role of positive emotions in experiential decisions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(4), 324–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.09.002
22.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
23.
LeeE.-H. (2012). Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian Nursing Research, 6(4), 121–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004
24.
LiP.XiaoX.JordanE. (2023). Tourists’ visual attention and stress intensity in nature-based tourism destinations: An eye-tracking study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Travel Research, 62(8), 1667–1684. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875221138788
25.
LiP.XiaoX.PengH. (2023). Visitors’ perceived crowding, visual attention, and COVID infection risks in national parks: A social density optimization approach. Leisure Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2023.2267543
26.
LiQ.HuangZ.ChristiansonK. (2016). Visual attention toward tourism photographs with text: An eye-tracking study. Tourism Management, 54, 243–258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.11.017
27.
LiuY.HuM.ZhaoB. (2020). Interactions between forest landscape elements and eye movement behavior under audio-visual integrated conditions. Journal of Forest Research, 25(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2019.1707341
28.
LiuY.ZhangJ.LiuC.YangY. (2024). A review of attention restoration theory: Implications for designing restorative environments. Sustainability, 16(9), 1–18.
29.
LourençãoM.de Moura Engracia GiraldiJ.de OliveiraJ. H. C. (2020). Destination advertisement semiotic signs: Analysing tourists’ visual attention and perceived ad effectiveness. Annals of Tourism Research, 84, 103001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.103001
30.
LuY.-H.ZhangJ.ZhangH.XiaoX.LiuP.ZhuangM.HuM. (2022). Flow in soundscape: The conceptualization of soundscape flow experience and its relationship with soundscape perception and behaviour intention in tourism destinations. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(13), 2090–2108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1922363
31.
LvX.LiH.XiaL. (2020). Effects of haptic cues on consumers’ online hotel booking decisions: The mediating role of mental imagery. Tourism Management, 77, 104025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104025
32.
ManorB. R.GordonE. (2003). Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 128(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(03)00151-1
33.
McMahanE. A.EstesD. (2015). The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(6), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.994224
PreacherK.J.HayesA.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
36.
PrayagG.HosanyS.OdehK. (2013). The role of tourists’ emotional experiences and satisfaction in understanding behavioral intentions. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2013.05.001
37.
QiuM.JinX.ScottN. (2021). Sensescapes and attention restoration in nature-based tourism: Evidence from China and Australia. Tourism Management Perspectives, 39, 100855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100855
38.
SavinG.-D.FleàeriuC.BatranceaL. (2021). Eye tracking and tourism research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 28(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667211053387
39.
SchusterR.HammittW. E.MooreD. (2006). Stress appraisal and coping response to hassles experienced in outdoor recreation settings. Leisure Sciences, 28(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400500483919
40.
ScottN.GreenC.FairleyS. (2016). Investigation of the use of eye tracking to examine tourism advertising effectiveness. Current Issues in Tourism, 19(7), 634–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.1003797
SollbergerS.BernauerT.EhlertU. (2017). Predictors of visual attention to climate change images: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 46–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.001
43.
WalkerM.DewaldA.SinnettS. (2014). The role of modality congruence in the presentation and recognition of task-irrelevant stimuli in dual task paradigms [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
44.
WangM.LiP.XiaoX.ZhangH.LuJ.XuY. (2024). Tourists’ visual attention to cultural landscapes under crowding stimuli: An eye-tracking approach. Journal of Vacation Marketing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667241268918
45.
WangY.SparksB. A. (2016). An eye-tracking study of tourism photo stimuli: Image characteristics and ethnicity. Journal of Travel Research, 55(5), 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287514564598
46.
WernerA. F.GormanJ. C. (2023). The role of visual and auditory communication in the performance of a joint team task. Human Factors, 65(4), 663–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211031048
47.
WickensC. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210123806
48.
WilkieS.ThompsonE.CrannerP.GintyK. (2020). Attention restoration theory as a framework for analysis of Tweets about urban green space: A case study. Landscape Research, 45(6), 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2020.1738363
49.
WinerB. J. (1962). Multifactor experiments having repeated measures on the same elements. In WinerB. J. (Ed.), Statistical principles in experimental design. (pp. 298–378). McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037/11774-007
50.
ZafarA.CalderonC. M.YeboahA. M.DaltonK.IrvingE.Niechwiej-SzwedoE. (2023). Investigation of camera-free eye-tracking glasses compared to a video-based system. Sensors, 23(18), 7753. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/18/7753
51.
ZhaoT.WongI. A.TongP.LiN.XiongX. (2022). Gazing at the gazers: An investigation of travel advertisement modality interference. Journal of Travel Research, 61(4), 730–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211002645
