Effective strategies for managerial responses to guest reviews on peer-to-peer rental platforms remain undefined. This study utilizes symbolic interaction theory to explain the effect of hosts’ response positivity on guests’ review-posting intention. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining econometric modeling with experiment, to empirically examine the effects of response positivity and the underlying mechanism. The econometric findings indicate a “positivity paradox” in that overly positive responses reduce review-posting intention. This reduction is more pronounced for hosts who have made fewer responses to reviews and those without “Superhost” status. The results of the experiment reveal that this effect is largely driven by guests’ perceptions of the hosts’ authenticity, with overly positive responses often being interpreted as inauthentic. Our findings provide both theoretical and practical implications for stakeholders on peer-to-peer rental platforms. (Also available in Chinese)
AbhishekV.GuajardoJ. A.ZhangZ. (2021). Business models in the sharing economy: Manufacturing durable goods in the presence of peer-to-peer rental markets. Information Systems Research, 32(4), 1450–1469.
2.
AkarsuT. N.ForoudiP.MelewarT. (2020). What makes Airbnb likeable? Exploring the nexus between service attractiveness, country image, perceived authenticity and experience from a social exchange theory perspective within an emerging economy context. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102635.
3.
AksanN.KısacB.AydınM.DemirbukenS. (2009). Symbolic interaction theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 902–904.
4.
BarnesS. J.KirshnerS. N. (2021). Understanding the impact of host facial characteristics on Airbnb pricing: Integrating facial image analytics into tourism research. Tourism Management, 83, 104235.
5.
BlumerH. (1937). Social psychology. In SchmidtE. P. (Ed.), Man and society (pp. 144–198). Prentice-Hall.
6.
BlumerH. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
7.
BridgesJ.VásquezC. (2018). If nearly all Airbnb reviews are positive, does that make them meaningless?Current Issues in Tourism, 21(18), 2065–2083.
8.
ChenW.GuB.YeQ.ZhuK. X. (2019). Measuring and managing the externality of managerial responses to online customer reviews. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 81–96.
9.
ChenY.TussyadiahI. P. (2021). Service failure in peer-to-peer accommodation. Annals of Tourism Research, 88, 103156.
10.
ChungJ.JoharG. V.LiY.NetzerO.PearsonM. (2022). Mining consumer minds: Downstream consequences of host motivations for home-sharing platforms. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 817–838.
11.
FarmakiA.StergiouD. P. (2019). Escaping loneliness through Airbnb host-guest interactions. Tourism Management, 74, 331–333.
12.
FoerdererJ. (2020). Interfirm exchange and innovation in platform ecosystems: Evidence from Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference. Management Science, 66(10), 4772–4787.
13.
ForcesS.ClimateO.BockA. G.ZmudR. W.KimY.LeeJ. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.
14.
FradkinA.GrewalE.HoltzD. (2021). Reciprocity and unveiling in two-sided reputation systems: Evidence from an experiment on Airbnb. Marketing Science, 40(6), 1013–1029.
15.
GaoL.LiH.LiangS.YangJ.LawR. (2022). How does constraining description affect guest booking decisions and satisfaction?Tourism Management, 93, 104607.
16.
GuB.YeQ. (2014). First step in social media: Measuring the influence of online management responses on customer satisfaction. Production and Operations Management, 23, 570–582.
17.
GunterU. (2018). What makes an Airbnb host a superhost? Empirical evidence from San Francisco and the Bay Area. Tourism Management, 66, 26–37.
18.
GunterU.ÖnderI.ZekanB. (2020). Modeling Airbnb demand to New York City while employing spatial panel data at the listing level. Tourism Management, 77, 104000.
19.
GuoX.YeQ.LawR.LiangS.ZhangY. (2022). Power of apologetic responses in online travel community. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 103, 103208.
20.
HallP. M. (1972). A symbolic interactionist analysis of politics. Sociological Inquiry, 42(3–4), 35–75.
21.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.
22.
JayachandranS.SharmaS.KaufmanP.RamanP. (2005). The role of relational information processes and technology use in customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 177–192.
23.
KernisM. H.GoldmanB. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283–357.
24.
LiangS.LiH.LiuX.SchuckertM. (2019). Motivators behind information disclosure: Evidence from Airbnb hosts. Annals of Tourism Research, 76, 305–319.
25.
LiangS.SchuckertM.LawR.ChenC. C. (2017). Be a “Superhost”: The importance of badge systems for peer-to-peer rental accommodations. Tourism Management, 60, 454–465.
26.
LiangS.SchuckertM.LawR.ChenC. C. (2020). The importance of marketer-generated content to peer-to-peer property rental platforms: Evidence from Airbnb. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 84, 102329.
27.
LiangS.ZhangX.LiC.LiH.YuX. (2021). Tit for tat: understanding the responding behavior of property hosts on peer-to-peer rental platforms. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(3), 1105–1126.
28.
LiuS.WangN.GaoB.GallivanM. (2021). To be similar or to be different? The effect of hotel managers’ rote response on subsequent reviews. Tourism Management, 86, 104346.
29.
LiuW.JiR. (2019). Do hotel responses matter?: A comprehensive perspective on investigating online reviews. Information Resources Management Journal, 32(3), 70–89.
30.
LiuX.LawR. (2019). Insights into managers’ response behavior: Priority and effort. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 468–470.
31.
MassetJ.DecropA. (2021). Meanings of tourist souvenirs: From the holiday experience to everyday life. Journal of Travel Research, 60(4), 718–734.
32.
ModyM.HanksL. (2020). Consumption authenticity in the accommodations industry: The keys to brand love and brand loyalty for hotels and Airbnb. Journal of Travel Research, 59(1), 173–189.
33.
NetemeyerR. G.BeardenW. O. (1992). A comparative analysis of two models of behavioral intention. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 49–59.
34.
NunesJ. C.OrdaniniA.GiambastianiG. (2021). The concept of authenticity: What it means to consumers. Journal of Marketing, 85(4), 1–20.
35.
ProserpioD.ZervasG. (2017). Online reputation management: Estimating the impact of management responses on consumer reviews. Marketing Science, 36(5), 645–665.
36.
RobinsonM. D.JohnsonJ. T.ShieldsS. A. (1995). On the advantages of modesty: The benefits of a balanced self-presentation. Communication Research, 22(5), 575–591.
37.
SahooN.DellarocasC.SrinivasanS. (2018). The impact of online product reviews on product returns. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 723–738.
38.
SerpeR. T.StrykerS. (2011). The symbolic interactionist perspective and identity theory. In SchwartzS. J.LuyckxK.VignolesV. L. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 225–248). Springer.
39.
ShengJ. (2019). Being active in online communications: Firm responsiveness and customer engagement behaviour. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 46, 40–51.
ShuqairS.PintoD. C.MattilaA. S. (2019). Benefits of authenticity: Post-failure loyalty in the sharing economy. Annals of Tourism Research, 78, 102741.
42.
SoK. K. F.KimH.OhH. (2021). What makes Airbnb experiences enjoyable? The effects of environmental stimuli on perceived enjoyment and repurchase intention. Journal of Travel Research, 60(5), 1018–1038.
43.
SuanpangP.JamjuntrP.KaewyongP. (2021). Sentiment analysis with a TextBlob package implications for tourism. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 24, 1–9.
44.
TsaiC. F.ChenK.HuY. H.ChenW. K. (2020). Improving text summarization of online hotel reviews with review helpfulness and sentiment. Tourism Management, 80, 104122.
45.
TussyadiahI. P.ParkS. (2018). When guests trust hosts for their words: Host description and trust in sharing economy. Tourism Management, 67, 261–272.
46.
WuM.-Y.TongY.LiQ.WallG.WuX. (2023). Interaction rituals and social relationships in a rural tourism destination. Journal of Travel Research, 62(7), 1480–1496.
47.
XieK. L.ZhangZ.ZhangZ.SinghA.LeeS. K. (2016). Effects of managerial response on consumer eWOM and hotel performance: Evidence from TripAdvisor. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(9), 2013–2034.
48.
XuX.ZhaoY. (2022). Examining the influence of linguistic characteristics of online managerial response on return customers’ change in satisfaction with hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 103146.
49.
XuY.LiH.LawR.ZhangZ. (2020). Can receiving managerial responses induce more user reviewing effort? A mixed method investigation in hotel industry. Tourism Management, 77, 103982.
50.
YaoQ.KuaiL.WangC. L. (2022). How frontline employees’ communication styles affect consumers’ willingness to interact: The boundary condition of emotional ability similarity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, 103082.
51.
ZervasG.ProserpioD.ByersJ. W. (2021). A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average. Marketing Letters, 32(1), 1–16.
52.
ZhangN.RenR.ZhangQ.ZhangT. (2020). Air pollution and tourism development: An interplay. Annals of Tourism Research, 85, 103032.
53.
ZhangX.QiaoS.YangY.ZhangZ. (2020). Exploring the impact of personalized management responses on tourists’ satisfaction: A topic matching perspective. Tourism Management, 76, 103953.
54.
ZhangX.WeiX.ZhangT.LiangS.MaY.LawR. (2024). Power of sentiment expressions on peer-to-peer rental platforms: A mixed-method approach. Journal of Travel Research, 63, 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231158598
55.
ZhangX.ZhangX.LawR.LiangS. (2021). Identifying local bias on peer-to-peer rental platforms. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 99, 103072.
56.
ZhangZ.LiangS.LiH.ZhangZ. (2019). Booking now or later: do online peer reviews matter?International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 147–158.
57.
ZhouL.WangW.XuJ.LiuT.GuJ. (2018). Perceived information transparency in B2C e-commerce: An empirical investigation. Information Management, 55(7), 912–927.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
