Exploring Needed Support as a Motivational Factor for Travelers with Mobility Impairments: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Exploration

Abstract

Despite needing more support in tourism, individuals with mobility impairments consistently show strong travel motivation, regardless of their physical challenges. This study utilizes self-determination theory and employs a sequential mixed-methods approach to delve into the role of needed support in driving travel motivation and to understand the intrinsic processes at play. From 39 interviews, a qualitative analysis was conducted, leading to the development of a scale specifically designed for those with mobility impairments. Further quantitative research was undertaken to refine this scale and evaluate the proposed model. By comparing and integrating qualitative and quantitative results, the study provides deeper insights. This investigation not only challenges prevailing notions within self-determination theory but also emphasizes the pivotal role of needed support. It unveils unique motivational drivers for those with mobility impairments in tourism contexts, advocating for scholars, industry professionals, and policymakers to reconsider their views and champion more inclusive practices.

Keywords

accessible tourism inclusive tourism individuals with mobility impairments needed support psychological needs travel motivation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baumgartner

Homburg

(1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161.

Bearden

W. O.

Sharma

Teel

J. E.

(1982). Sample size effects on chi square and other statistics used in evaluating causal models. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 425–430.

Beard

J. G.

Ragheb

M. G.

(1983). Measuring leisure motivation. Journal of Leisure Research, 15(3), 219–228.

Birtchnell

(1988). Defining dependence. The British Journal of Medical Psychology, 61(2), 111–123.

Blichfeldt

B. S.

Nicolaisen

(2011). Disabled travel: Not easy, but doable. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(1), 79–102.

Bollen

K. A.

(1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210). John Wiley & Sons.

Buhalis

Darcy

Ambrose

(2012). Best practice in accessible tourism: Inclusion, disability, ageing population and tourism. Channel View Publications.

Chen

C.-C.

Petrick

J. F.

(2013). Health and wellness benefits of travel experiences: A literature review. Journal of Travel Research, 52(6), 709–719.

Chen

Huang

(2019). Backpacker personal development, generalized self-efficacy, and self-esteem: Testing a structural model. Journal of Travel Research, 58(4), 680–694.

10.

Cheng

Y.-H.

Chen

S.-Y.

(2015). Perceived accessibility, mobility, and connectivity of public transportation systems. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, 77, 386–403.

11.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255.

12.

Chung

J. Y.

Lee

(2019). Desired recreation companionship and travel behaviour of people with disabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(4), 314–324.

13.

Cole

Zhang

Wang

C. M.

(2019). The influence of accessibility and motivation on leisure travel participation of people with disabilities. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(1), 119–130.

14.

Creswell

J. W.

Clark

V. L. P.

(2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

15.

Daniels

M. J.

Drogin Rodgers

E. B.

Wiggins

B. P.

(2005). “Travel Tales”: An interpretive analysis of constraints and negotiations to pleasure travel as experienced by persons with physical disabilities. Tourism Management, 26(6), 919–930.

16.

Darcy

(2002). Marginalised participation: Physical disability, high support needs and tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 9(1), 61–73.

17.

Darcy

McKercher

Schweinsberg

(2020). From tourism and disability to accessible tourism: A perspective article. Tourism Review, 75(1), 140–144.

18.

Deci

Vallerand

Pelletier

Ryan

(1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 325–346.

19.

Deci

E. L.

Eghrari

Patrick

B. C.

Leone

D. R.

(1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142.

20.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.

21.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024–1037.

22.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

23.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2004). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press.

24.

DeVellis

R. F.

Thorpe

C. T.

(2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications.

25.

Finkelstein

(2001). The social model of disability repossessed. Manchester Coalition of Disabled People, 1, 1–5.

26.

Fornell

Larcker

D. F.

(1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.

27.

Friese

(2019). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. Sage Publications.

28.

Gioia

D. A.

Corley

K. G.

Hamilton

A. L.

(2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.

29.

Greene

J. C.

(2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey-Bass.

30.

Hair

J. F.

Black

W. C.

Babin

B. J.

Anderson

R. E.

Tatham

R. L.

(Eds.). (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

31.

Hair

J. F.

Risher

J. J.

Sarstedt

Ringle

C. M.

(2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

32.

Hajjar

(2018). Statistical analysis: Internal-consistency reliability and construct validity. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 6(1), 27–38.

33.

Henseler

Ringle

C. M.

Sarstedt

(2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135.

34.

Hooper

Coughlan

Mullen

M. R.

(2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

35.

Hua

Cole

(2022). Influence of psychological factors on participation and life satisfaction in the context of travel and tourism after spinal cord injury. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 516.

36.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

37.

Jang

Kim

E. J.

Reeve

(2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38.

38.

Lee

B. K.

Agarwal

Kim

H. J.

(2012). Influences of travel constraints on the people with disabilities’ intention to travel: An application of Seligman’s helplessness theory. Tourism Management, 33(3), 569–579.

39.

MacCallum

R. C.

Austin

J. T.

(2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 201–226.

40.

Maynard

F. M.

Bracken

M. B.

Creasey

Ditunno

J. F.

Jr Donovan

W. H.

Ducker

T. B.

Garber

S. L.

Marino

R. J.

Stover

S. L.

Tator

C. H.

(1997). International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 35(5), 266–274.

41.

Moayerian

McGehee

N. G.

Stephenson

M. O.

(2022). Community cultural development: Exploring the connections between collective art making, capacity building and sustainable community-based tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 93, 103355.

42.

Moura

Eusébio

Devile

(2023). The ‘why’ and ‘what for’ of participation in tourism activities: Travel motivations of people with disabilities. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(6), 941–957.

43.

Mumbardó-Adam

Guàrdia-Olmos

Adam-Alcocer

A. L.

Carbó-Carreté

Balcells-Balcells

Giné

Shogren

K. A.

(2017). Self-Determination, intellectual disability, and context: A meta-analytic study. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55(5), 303–314.

44.

Mumbardó-Adam

Guàrdia-Olmos

Giné

(2018). Exploring the impact of disability on self-determination measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 78, 27–34.

45.

National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. (2023). Traumatic spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. University of Alabama at Birmingham. https://go.iu.edu/4R0n

46.

Oliver

(1996). The social model in context. In Understanding disability: From theory to practice (pp. 30–42). Palgrave. Macmillan.

47.

Oliver

(1997). The disability movement is a new social movement! Community Development Journal, 32(3), 244–251.

48.

Oliver

(2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026.

49.

Özcan

Güçhan Topcu

Z. G.

Arasli

(2021). Determinants of travel participation and experiences of wheelchair users traveling to the Bodrum region: A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2218.

50.

Page

S. J.

O’Connor

Peterson

(2001). Leaving the disability ghetto: A qualitative study of factors underlying achievement motivation among athletes with disabilities. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 25(1), 40–55.

51.

Pung

J. M.

Gnoth

Del Chiappa

(2020). Tourist transformation: Towards a conceptual model. Annals of Tourism Research, 81, 102885.

52.

Rosseel

(2012). Lavaan: An R Package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.

53.

RStudio Team. (2020). RStudio: Integrated development for R. PBC. http://www.rstudio.com.

54.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2011). A self-determination theory perspective on social, institutional, cultural, and economic supports for autonomy and their importance for well-being. In Delle Fave

(Ed.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context (pp. 45–64). Springer.

55.

Shi

Cole

Chancellor

H. C.

(2012). Understanding leisure travel motivations of travelers with acquired mobility impairments. Tourism Management, 33(1), 228–231.

56.

Smears

(1996). Researching disability: A response to Karla Henderson, Leandra Bedini, Lynn Hecht and Rosemary Schuler. Leisure Studies, 15(1), 79–81.

57.

Thompson

(2007). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31(3), 245–248.

58.

Thompson

J. R.

Bradley

V. J.

Buntinx

W. H.

Schalock

R. L.

Shogren

K. A.

Snell

M. E.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Borthwick-Duffy

Coulter

D. L.

Craig

E. P.

Gomez

S. C.

Lachapelle

Luckasson

R. A.

Reeve

Spreat

Tassé

M. J.

Verdugo

M. A.

Yeager

M. H.

(2009). Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(2), 135–146.

59.

Willits

F. K.

Theodori

G. L.

Luloff

(2016). Another look at Likert scales. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 31(3), 6.

60.

World Tourism Organization. (2016). World Tourism Day 2016 “Tourism for all - promoting universal accessibility”: Good practices in the accessible tourism supply chain. UNWTO. https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284418138

61.

Yau

M. K.-S.

McKercher

Packer

T. L.

(2004). Traveling with a disability: More than an access issue. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(4), 946–960.

62.

Zhang

Cole

Hirt

Bilgihan

(2017). Self-determined travel facilitation with mental construal priming. Tourism Management, 61, 472–483.

63.

Zhang

Cole

Ricci

Gao

(2019). Context-based leisure travel facilitation among people with mobility challenges: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Travel Research, 58(1), 42–62.