This study reviewed use of covariance-based structural equation modeling (SEM) in 209 articles published in nine tourism journals between 2000 and 2011. Time-series analysis suggested that the number of SEM publications is explained by linear and quadratic time effects. Results indicated that although SEM practices have improved in some areas, tourism researchers do not always engage in the recommended best practices. Problematic areas were related to testing of alternative a priori models, reporting of multivariate normality, estimating effect size, and assessing reliability and validity. Some of the recommended fit indices were also underutilized. The review also found few differences in SEM practices between top-tier journals and other publications in the tourism field. On the basis of these results, suggestions to improve use of SEM in tourism studies are discussed in the light of recent developments in this technique.
AndersonJ.GerbingW. (1988). “Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two Stage Approach.” Psychological Bulletin, 27(1): 5-24.
2.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.” Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3): 411-23.
BagozziR. P.YiY. (1988). “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16: 74-94.
5.
BagozziR. P.YiY. (2012). “Specifications, Evaluation, and Interpretation of Structural Equation Models.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40: 8-34.
6.
BaronM.KennyD. A. (1986). “Moderator-Mediator Variables Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6): 1173-82.
7.
BarrettP. (2007). “Structural Equation Modelling: Adjudging Model Fit.” Personality and Individual Differences, 42 (5): 815-24.
8.
BaumgartnerH.HomburgC. (1996). “Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research.” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13: 139-61.
9.
BentlerP. M. (1978). “The Interdependence of Theory, Methodology, and Empirical Data: Casual Modeling as an Approach to Construct Validation.” In Longitudinal Drug Research, edited by KandelD. B.New York: John Wiley, pp. 267-302.
10.
BentlerP. M. (2000). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
11.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). “Significant Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structure.” Psychological Bulletin, 88: 588-606.
12.
BentlerP. M.ChouC. P. (1987). “Practical Issues in Structural Modeling.” Sociological Methods and Research, 16 (1): 78-117.
13.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.
BurdenskiT. (2000). “Evaluating Univariate, Bivariate, and Multivariate Normality Using Graphical and Statistical Procedures.” Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 26 (2): 15-28.
16.
BurtR. S. (1976). “Interpretational Confounding of Unobserved Variables in Structural Equation Models.” Sociological Methods and Research, 5: 3-52.
17.
ByrneB. M. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Applications and Programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
ChouC.BentlerP. M.SatorraA. (1991). “Scaled Test Statistics and Robust Standard Errors for Non-normal Data in Covariance Structure Analysis: A Monte Carlo Study.” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44: 347-57.
20.
CostelloA. B.OsborneJ. W. (2005). “Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10: 1-9.
21.
CrockettS. A. (2012). “A Five-Step Guide to Conducting SEM Analysis in Counseling Research.” Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 3: 30-47.
22.
FisherR. A. (1922). “On the Interpretation of χ2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85 (1): 87-94.
23.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research, 48: 39-50.
24.
GerbingD. W.AndersonJ. C. (1985). “The Effects of Sampling Error and Model Characteristics on Parameter Estimation for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20: 255-71.
25.
HairJ. F.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2011). “PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19 (2): 139-51.
26.
HairJ. F.SarstedtM.PieperT. M.RingleC. M. (Forthcoming). “The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications.” Long Range Planning.
27.
HairJ. F.SarstedtM.RingleC. M.MenaJ. A. (2012). “An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing Research.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40: 414-33.
28.
HeeneM.HilbertS.DraxlerC.ZieglerM. (2011). “Masking Misfit in Confirmatory Factor Analysis by Increasing Unique Variances: A Cautionary Note on the Usefulness of Cutoff Values of Fit Indices.” Psychological Methods, 16 (3): 319-36.
29.
HolbertR. L.StephensonM. T. (2002). “Structural Equation Modeling in the Communication Sciences, 1995-2000.” Human Communication Research, 28 (4): 531-51.
30.
HoyleR. H. (1995). “The Structural Equation Modeling Approach: Basic Concepts and Fundamental Issues.” In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Application, edited by HoyleR. H.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1-15.
31.
HoyleR. H.PanterA. T. (1995). “Writing about Structural Equation Models.” In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, edited by HoyleR. H.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 158-76.
32.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1995). “Evaluating Model Fit.” In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, edited by HoyleR. H.London: Sage, pp. 76-99.
33.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1998). “Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparemeterized Model Misspecification.” Psychological Methods, 3 (4): 424-53.
34.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling, 6: 1-55.
35.
HuL.BentlerP. M.KanoY. (1992). “Can Test Statistics in Covariance Structure Analysis Be Trusted?” Psychological Bulletin, 112 (2): 351-62.
36.
IacobucciD. (2010). “Structural Equations Modeling: Fit Indices, Sample Size, and Advanced Topics.” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20: 90-98.
37.
JöreskogK. G. (1993). “Testing Structural Equation Models.” In Testing Structural Equation Models, edited by BollenK. A.LongJ. S.Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 294-316.
38.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (1996). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
39.
KlineR. B. (1998). Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford.
40.
LauR. S.CheungG. W. (2012). “Estimating and Comparing Specific Effects in Complex Latent Variable Models.” Organizational Research Methods, 15 (1): 3-16.
41.
MacCallumR. C.AustinJ. T. (2000). “Application of Structural Equation Modeling in Psychological Research.” Annual Review of Psychology, 51: 201-26.
42.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). “Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling.” Psychological Methods, 1 (2): 130-49.
43.
MacCallumR. C.RoznowskiM.NecowitzL. B. (1992). “Model Modification in Covariance Structure Analysis: The Problem of Capitalization on Chance.” Psychological Bulletin, 111: 490-504.
44.
MacCallumR. C.WegenerD. T.UchinoB. N.FabrigarL. R. (1993). “The Problem of Equivalent Models in Applications of Covariance Structure Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin, 114: 185-99.
45.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). “A Comparison of Methods to Test Mediation and Other Intervening Variable Effects.” Psychological Methods, 7: 83-104.
46.
MartensM. P. (2005). “The Use of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research.” Counseling Psychologist, 33: 269-98.
47.
McDonaldR. P.HoM. R. (2002). “Principles and Practice of Reporting Structural Equation Analyses.” Psychological Methods, 7 (1): 64-82.
MuellerR. O. (1996). Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Springer-Verlag.
50.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). “When Moderation Is Mediated and Mediation Is Moderated.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89: 852-63.
51.
NunkooR.RamkissoonH. (2011). “Developing a Community Support Model for Tourism.” Annals of Tourism Research, 38 (3): 964-88.
52.
NunkooR.RamkissoonH. (2012a). “Power, Trust, Social Exchange and Community Support.” Annals of Tourism Research, 39 (2): 997-1023.
53.
NunkooR.RamkissoonH. (2012b). “Structural Equation Modelling and Regression Analysis in Tourism Research.” Current Issues in Tourism, 18 (2): 777-802.
54.
NunkooR.RamkissoonH.GursoyD. (2012). “Public Trust in Tourism Institutions.” Annals of Tourism Research, 39 (3): 1538-64.
55.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. 3rd edition.New York: McGraw-Hill.
56.
NyeC. D.DrasgowF. (2011). “Assessing Goodness of Fit: Simple Rules of Thump Simply Do Not Work.” Organizational Research Methods, 14: 548-70.
57.
OryD. T.MokhtarianP. L. (2010). “The Impact of Non-normality, Sample Size and Estimation Technique on Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Modeling: Evidence from Ten Empirical Models of Travel Behavior.” Quality and Quantity, 44: 427-45.
58.
QuintanaS. M.MaxwellS. E. (1999). “Implications of Recent Developments in Structural Equations Modeling for Counseling Psychology.” Counseling Psychologist, 27: 485-527.
59.
ReisingerY.MavondoF. (2007). “Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 21 (4): 41-71.
60.
ReisingerY.TurnerL. (1999). “Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Application in Tourism.” Tourism Management, 20: 71-88.
61.
RyuE. (2011). “Effects of Skewness and Kurtosis on Normal-Theory Based Maximum Likelihood Test Statistics in Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling.” Behavioral Research, 43: 1066-74.
62.
SchumackerR.LomaxR. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd edition.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
ShahR.GoldsteinS. M. (2006). “Use of Structural Equation Modeling in Operations Management Research: Looking Back and Forward.” Journal of Operations Management, 24: 148-69.
64.
ShookC. L.KetchenD. J.JrHultG. T.KacmarK. M. (2004). “An Assessment of the Use of Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research.” Strategic Management Journal, 25: 397-404.
65.
StageF. K.CarterH. C.NoraA. (2004). “Path Analysis: An Introduction and Analysis of a Decade of Research.” Journal of Educational Research, 98: 5-12.
66.
SunS.KonoldT. R.FanX. (2011). “Effects of Latent Variable Nonnormality and Model Misspecification on Testing Structural Equation Modeling Interactions.” Journal of Experimental Education, 79 (3): 231-56.
67.
TomarkenA. J.WallerN. G. (2003). “Potential Problems with “Well Fitting” Models.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112 (4): 578-98.
68.
Vargas-SanchezA.Porras-BuenoN.Plaza-MejiaM. A. (2011). “Explaining Residents’ Attitudes to Tourism: Is a Universal Model Possible.” Annals of Tourism Research, 38 (2): 460-80.
WilliamsL. J.O’BoyleE.Jr. (2011). “The Myth of Global Fit Indices and Alternatives foaramesr Assessing Latent Variable Relations.” Organizational Research Methods, 14: 350-69.
71.
WuD.ZumboB. D. (2008). “Understanding and Using Mediators and Moderators.” Social Indicators Research, 87: 367-92.
72.
ZhongX.YuanK. H. (2011). “Bias and Efficiency in Structural Equation Modeling: Maximum Likelihood and Robust Methods.” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46 (2): 229-65.
