Communicating risk through public-facing formats like infographics is important in technical communication. Grounding our work in a collection of infographics about extreme heat risk, we argue that understanding attention and memory can help communicators make more effective design choices. This study combined eye tracking with memorability data to determine (a) what elements of infographics (text, visuals) drew attention and (b) what participants found memorable about heat risk communication. Results from our exploratory research found that student designer and community participants (1) spent less time reviewing the bottom quarter of infographics and (2) spent the majority of their time reading text but remembered visual and textual elements equally.
AnsonC. M.SchweglerR. A. (2012). Tracking the mind’s eye: A new technology for researching twenty-first-century writing and Reading processes. College Composition and Communication, 64(1), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc201220864
3.
BaniyaS. (2022). Transnational assemblages in disaster response: Networked communities, technologies, and coalitional actions during global disasters. Technical Communication Quarterly, 31(4), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2022.2034973
4.
BaxterM.LonsdaleM.WestlandS. (2021). Utilising design principles to improve the perception and effectiveness of public health infographics. Information Design Journal, 26(2), 124–156. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.20017.bax
5.
BorkinM. A., et al. (2013). What makes a visualization memorable?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2306–2315. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.234
BrunyéT. T.DrewT.WeaverD. L.ElmoreJ. G. (2019). A review of eye tracking for understanding and improving diagnostic interpretation. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4(1), 7–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0159-2
8.
CialdiniR. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. (EPub edition.). HarperCollins Publishers.
9.
CookeL. (2010). Assessing concurrent think-aloud protocol as a usability test method: A technical communication approach : Technical communication and usability studies. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2010.2052859
10.
CosgroveS. J. (2023). Improving technical and risk communication: An organizational study of North Carolina emergency management and hurricane florence. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 66(3), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2023.3295969
11.
DaviesJ. C.CovelloV. T.AllenF. W. (1987). Risk communication : proceedings of the National Conference on Risk Communication, held in Washington, D.C., January 29-31, 1986.
EllingS.LentzL.de JongM. (2012). Combining concurrent think-aloud protocols and eye-tracking observations: An analysis of verbalizations and silences. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(3), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2012.2206190
14.
FischhoffB. (1987). Treating the public with risk communications: A public health perspective. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 12(3/4), 13–19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11649904/
15.
FuhrmanO.BoroditskyL. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34(8), 1430–1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01105.x
16.
GreussingE.KesslerS.HajoG. B. (2020). Learning from science news via interactive and animated data visualizations: An investigation combining eye tracking, online survey, and cued retrospective reporting. Science Communication, 42(6), 803–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020962100
17.
HolmqvistK.AnderssonR. (2007). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods, paradigms, and measures. Lund.
18.
JonesJ.KostelnickC. (2015). Information graphics and intuition: Heuristics as a techne for visualization. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(3), 284–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651915573943
19.
KingA. J., et al. (2019). Improving visual behavior research in communication science: An overview, review, and reporting recommendations for using eye-tracking methods. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(3), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1558194
20.
LauerC.BrumbergerE. (2019). Redefining writing for the responsive workplace. College Composition and Communication, 70(4), 634–663. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc201930182
21.
LauerC.SanchezC. A. (2023). What eye tracking can show us about how people are influenced by deceptive tactics in line graphs. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 66(3), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2023.3290948
22.
LiuC.WuC. (2022). Effects of working memory and relevant knowledge on reading texts and infographics. Reading & Writing, 36(9), 2319–2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10368-1
23.
MajooniA., et al. (2018). An eye-tracking study on the effect of infographic structures on viewer’s comprehension and cognitive load. Information Visualization, 17(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871617701971
24.
Maricopa County Public Health. (n.d.). Heat fact sheet: Stay cool. Stay hydrated. Stay informed. Maricopa County. WeArePublicHealth.org
25.
Marlon, J., Goddard, E., Howe, P., Mildenberger, M., Jefferson, M., Carman, J., Rosenthal, S., Fine, E., Gillreath-Brown, A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2025). Yale Climate Opinion Maps, 2024. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/ycom-us/
MayrhuberE. A.-S.DückersM. L. A.WallnerP.ArnbergerA.AllexB.WiesböckL.WankaA.KollandF.EderR.HutterH.-P.KutalekR. (2018). Vulnerability to heatwaves and implications for public health interventions – A scoping review. Environmental Research, 166, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.021
28.
McSween-CadieuxE.ChabotC.FillolA.SahaT.DagenaisC. (2021). Use of infographics as a health-related knowledge translation tool: Protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open, 11(6), e046117–e046117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046117
National Weather Service. (2022). Weather Fatalities 2022, Weather Related Fatality and Injury Statistics. US Department of Commerce.https://www.weather.gov/hazstat/.
31.
ProkopM.PilarL.TichaI. (2020). Impact of think-aloud on eye-tracking: A comparison of concurrent and retrospective think-aloud for research on decision-making in the game environment. Sensors, 20(10), 2750. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102750
32.
RaynerK. (2009). Eye movements in reading: Models and data. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.2.5.2
33.
ReamerD. (2015). “Risk = probability × consequences”: Probability, uncertainty, and the nuclear regulatory commission’s evolving risk communication rhetoric. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 349–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.1079334
34.
RichardsD. (2015). Testing the waters: Local users, sea level rise, and the productive usability of interactive geovisualizations. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 3(3), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2792989.2792992
35.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
36.
SauerB. (2003). The rhetoric of risk: technical documentation in hazardous environments. L. Erlbaum Associates.
37.
ScolareL., et al. (2013). Making electronic infographics enjoyable: Design guidelines based on eye tracking. Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design, edited by Ji Young Gu, CRC Press, 713-19. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12525-88
38.
SheridanH.ReingoldE. M. (2017). Chess players’ eye movements reveal rapid recognition of complex visual patterns: Evidence from a chess-related visual search task. Journal of Vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 17(3), 4–4. https://doi.org/10.1167/17.3.4
39.
SlavinaA.Karabulut-IlguA.JahrenC. (2020). Student use of scaffolding resources in a hybrid course: Evidence from eye-tracking. International Journal of Innovations in Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJInnovOnlineEdu.2020032355
40.
StephensS. H.AltamiranoA. (2024). Envisioning user agency during development of a website for natural hazard communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 38(4), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519241258456
StoferK.CheX. (2014). Comparing experts and novices on scaffolded data visualizations using eye-tracking. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 7(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.7.5.2
43.
SuttonJ.FischerL. M. (2021). Understanding visual risk communication messages: An analysis of visual attention allocation and think-aloud responses to tornado graphics. Weather, Climate, and Society, 13(1), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0042.1
VanderMolenK.KimutisN.HatchettB. J. (2022). Recommendations for increasing the reach and effectiveness of heat risk education and warning messaging. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 82, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103288
46.
ZhangY. (2017). Assessing attitudes toward content and design in Alibaba’s dry goods business infographics. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(1), 30–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651916667530
