This article examines United States Agency for International Development’s (USAID's) maternal health (MH) success stories as transnational assemblages that deploy security logics to justify external governance while appearing to celebrate local agency. Through rhetorical-cultural analysis of 25 narratives, I identify three recurring strategies—crisis amplification, representational homogenization, and paratextual techniques—that frame MH as requiring urgent intervention. These stories obscure local expertise and align care with donor-defined metrics and narrative arcs. Findings show that security logics circulate through genre conventions and design templates that normalize intervention as technical and humanitarian. I argue TPC scholars must examine assemblage mechanisms’ role in shaping representation, risk, and care transnationally.
AgbokaG. Y. (2013). Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.730966
2.
AngeliE. L. (2019). Rhetorical work in emergency medical services: Communicating in the unpredictable workplace (Ser. Attw book series in technical and professional communication). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315104881
3.
AppaduraiA. (2013). The future as cultural fact: Essays on the global condition. Verso.
4.
BaniyaR. (2022). Transnational assemblages in disaster response: Networked communities, technologies, and coalitional actions during global disasters. Technical Communication Quarterly, 31(4), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2022.2034973
5.
BenatarS.BrockG. (2021). Global health ethics: Critical perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
6.
BuzanB.WæverO.de WildeJ. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
7.
DeLandaM. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh University Press.
8.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
9.
DingH. (2014). Rhetoric of a global epidemic: Transcultural communication about SARS. Southern Illinois University Press.
10.
DingoR. (2012). Networking arguments: Rhetoric, transnational feminism, and public policy writing. University of Pittsburgh Press.
11.
DingoR.ScottJ. B. (2013). Introduction: The "megarhetorics" of global development. In DingoR.ScottJ. B. (Eds.), The megarhetorics of global development (pp. 1–25). University of Pittsburgh Press.
12.
FrostE. A. (2013). Transcultural risk communication on Dauphin Island: An analysis of ironically located responses to the deepwater horizon disaster. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.726483
13.
GonzalesL. (2018). Sites of translation: What multilinguals can teach us about digital writing and rhetoric. University of Michigan Press.
14.
GonzalesL.ZantjerR. (2015). Translation as a user-localization practice. Technical Communication, 62(4), 271–284.
15.
HollandJ.JarvisL. (2024). Security governance and the politics of race. Manchester University Press.
16.
McInnesC.Kamradt-ScottA.LeeK.Roemer-MahlerA.RushtonS.WilliamsO. D. (2014). The transformation of global health governance. Palgrave Pivot London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137365729
17.
MüllerM. (2015). Assemblages and actor-networks: Rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geography Compass, 9(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12192
18.
ObregonR.WaisbordS. (2012). The handbook of global health communication. Wiley-Blackwell.
19.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
20.
ScottJ. B. (2003). Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing. Southern Illinois University Press.
21.
SeigelM., & Pincus, J. (2013). The rhetoric of pregnancy. University of Chicago Press.
van der Ree, G. (2013). The politics of scientific representation in international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Relations, 42(1), 24–44.
24.
WrangeI. (2022). Entangled security logics: from the decision-makers’ discourses to the decision-takers’ interpretations of civil defence. European Security, 31(4), 576–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.2021889
25.
YaminA. E. (2023). Five lessons for advancing maternal health rights in an age of neoliberal globalization and conservative backlash.
