Institutions create security regimes under the guise of protection, but these measures, even with the best intentions, can be problematic to execute due to competing logics, such as tensions between government regulations and institutional priorities. Data Protection Officers (DPOs) must navigate these conflicting logics, balancing data privacy with intuitional concerns. This article argues that DPOs can find power by identifying gaps between regulatory and institutional logics to form localized tactics to carry out their jobs in line with their own ethics and morals. By doing so, workers can reclaim power in the seemingly dominating power of security logics.
BartonB.BartonM. (1988). Narration in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/105065198800200103
De CerteauM. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). University of California Press.
7.
EgglB. (2019). Learning to walk the tightrope: Challenges DPOs face in the day-to-day exercise of their responsibilities. Journal of Data Protection & Privacy, 3(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.69554/NVCH8528
RandallT. S. (2022). Taking the tactical out of technical: A reassessment of tactical technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 52(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211006341
22.
SurwilloI. (2019). Energy security logics in Europe: threat, risk or emancipation?Routledge.
23.
VisserF. (2024). Selling privacy by design [Master Media Studies Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam]. https://thesis.eur.nl/pub/75083
