The new European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation aims to adapt children’s right to privacy to the ‘digital age’. It explicitly recognizes that children deserve specific protection of their personal data, and introduces additional rights and safeguards for children. This article explores the dilemmas that the introduction of the child-tailored online privacy protection regime creates – the ‘empowerment versus protection’ and the ‘individualized versus average child’ dilemmas. It concludes that by favouring protection over the empowerment of children, the Regulation risks limiting children in their online opportunities, and by relying on the average child criteria, it fails to consider the evolving capacities and best interests of the child.
CortesiS (2013) Youth online: diversifying social media platforms and practices. In: GasserUFarisRHeacockR (eds) Internet Monitor 2013: Reflections on the Digital World. Berkman Center Research Publication 27, Cambridge: the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, pp. 16–17.
11.
DouglasM (2013) Rules and Meanings. London: Routledge.
12.
EekelaarJ (1986) The emergence of children’s rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies6(2): 161–182.
FederleKH (2013) Children and the Law: An Interdisciplinary Approach with Cases, Materials and Comments. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
FortinJ (2009) Children’s Rights and the Developing Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FreemanMDA (1983) The Rights and Wrongs of Children. London: Dover.
19.
FreemanMDA (1993) Laws, conventions and rights. Children & Society7(1): 37–48.
20.
GilmoreSGlennonL (2014) Hayes and Williams’ Family Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
HildebrandtM (2008) Profiling and the rule of law. Identity in the Information Society1(1): 55–70.
22.
HoofnagleC (2016) Federal Trade Commission Privacy Law and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
JasmontaiteLDe HertP (2014) The EU, children under 13 years and parental consent: a human rights analysis of a new, age-based bright-line for the protection of children on the Internet. International Data Privacy Law5(1): 20–33.
24.
LansdownG (2005) The Evolving Capacities of the Child. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
25.
LivingstoneSHelsperE (2007) Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society9(4): 671–696.
26.
LivingstoneSCarrJByrneJ (2015) One in three: Internet governance and children’s rights. Global commission on Internet governance paper series no. 22. London: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
27.
LivingstoneSHaddonLGörzigA. (2011) Risks and safety on the Internet: the perspective of European children. Full findings. London: EU Kids Online, LSE.
28.
McGlynnC (2002) Rights for children: the potential impact of the European Union charter of fundamental rights. European Public Law8(3): 387–400.
29.
MacenaiteM (2016) Protecting children’s privacy online: a critical look to four European self-regulatory initiatives. European Journal of Law and Technology7(2): 1
–26.
30.
MansellR (2002) From digital divides to digital entitlements in knowledge societies. Current Sociology50(3): 407–426.
31.
ManteleroA (2014) The future of consumer data protection in the EU: rethinking the ‘notice and consent’ paradigm in the new era of predictive analytics. Computer Law & Security Report30: 643–666.
32.
ManteleroA (2016) Children online and the future EU data protection framework: empirical evidences and legal analysis. International Journal of Technology Policy and Law2(2–4): 169–181.
33.
Mc CullaghK (2016) The General Data Protection Regulation: a partial success for children on social network sites?’ In: BräutigamTMiettinenS (eds) Data Protection, Privacy and European Regulation in the Digital Age: Unigrafia, pp. 110–139.
34.
MarwickAEboydd (2014) Networked privacy: how teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society16: 1051–1067.
35.
MontgomeryKChesterJ (2015) Data protection for youth in the digital age: developing a rights-based global framework. European Data Protection Law Review1(4): 277–291.
36.
NewellBCMetoyerCMooreAD (2015) Privacy in the family. In: RoesslerBMokrosinskaD (eds) Social Dimensions of Privacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–121.
37.
PiersonJ (2012) Online privacy in social media: a conceptual exploration of empowerment and vulnerability. Communications and Strategies4(88): 99–120.
38.
SavirimuthuJ (2016) Networked children, commercial profiling and the EU data protection reform agenda: in the child’s best interests? In: IusmenIStalfordH (eds) The EU as a Children’s Rights Actor: Law, Policy and Structural Dimensions. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 221–257.
39.
ScarreG (1980) Children and paternalism. Philosophy55(211): 117–124.
40.
SchermerBWCustersBHMVan Der HofS (2014) The crisis of consent: how stronger legal protectionmaylead to weaker consent in data protection. Ethics and Information Technology16(2): 171–182.
41.
ShmueliBBlecher-PrigatA (2011) Privacy for children. Columbia Human Rights Law Review42: 759–795.
42.
StalfordH (2012) Children and the European Union: Rights, Welfare and Accountability. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Van Der HofS (2014) No child’s play – online data protection for children. In: Van Der HofSVan Den BergBSchermerB (eds) Minding Minors Wandering the Web: Regulating Online Child Safety. Information Technology & Law Series No. 24. The Hague: Springer Press/TMC Asser Press, pp. 127–141.
46.
Van DijkJ (2013) Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
Van KokswijkJ (2007) Digital Ego: Social and Legal Aspects of Virtual Identity. Delft: Eburon Uitgeverij.
