Asking for money is one of the core communicative functions of a crowdfunding campaign. This article uses a novel corpus analysis scoring technique to investigate appeals language in a corpus of 312,529 Kickstarter campaigns. Our results show distinctive use patterns involving the verbs need, raise, please, make, and hope. Conceptual patterns, such as inviting the reader to participate in the creation of a product, underlie specific formulations of successful and unsuccessful word patterns and sentences. We conclude with theoretical and practical outcomes to aid technical communicators in more effectively writing crowdfunding campaigns on Kickstarter.
AartsB. (2011). Oxford modern English grammar. Oxford University Press.
2.
AnglinA. H.PidduckR. J. (2022). Choose your words carefully: Harnessing the language of crowdfunding for success. Business Horizons, 65(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.09.004
3.
AnglinA. H.ShortJ. C.DroverW.StevensonR. M.McKennyA. F.AllisonT. H. (2018). The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 470–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.003
CarradiniS., & Fleischmann, C. (2023). The effects of multimodal elements on success in kickstarter crowdfunding campaigns. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 37(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519221121699
6.
CarradiniS., & Nystrom, E. (2023).Elements of an emergent style guide for Kickstarter. Technical Communication, 70(1), 54–82.
7.
ChanH. F.MoyN.SchaffnerM.TorglerB. (2021). The effects of money saliency and sustainability orientation on reward-based crowdfunding success. Journal of Business Research, 125, 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.037
8.
CudmoreA.SlatteryD. M. (2019). An analysis of physical and rhetorical characteristics of videos used to promote technology projects, on the Kickstarter crowdfunding platform. Technical Communication, 66(4), 319–346.
DavidsonR.PoorN. (2019). Location, location, location: How digital platforms reinforce the importance of spatial proximity. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1464–1478. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444075
11.
DevarajS.PatelP. C. (2016). Influence of number of backers, goal amount, and project duration on meeting funding goals of crowdfunding projects. Economics Bulletin, 36(2), 1242–1249.
12.
DushnitskyG.FitzaM. A. (2018). Are we missing the platforms for the crowd? Comparing investment drivers across multiple crowdfunding platforms. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 10(e00100), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00100
13.
GafniH.MaromD.RobbA.SadeO. (2021). Gender dynamics in crowdfunding (Kickstarter): Evidence on entrepreneurs, backers, and taste-based discrimination. Review of Finance, 25(2), 235–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfaa041
14.
GallagherJ. R.BeveridgeA. (2022). Project-oriented web scraping in technical communication research. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 36(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519211064619
15.
Grebelsky-LichtmanT.AvnimelechG. (2018). Immediacy communication and success in crowdfunding campaigns: A multimodal communication approach. International Journal of Communication, 12(27,4178–4204. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7691.
16.
IshizakiS. (2016). Computer-aided rhetorical analysis of crowdfunding pitches. 2016 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2016.7740540.
17.
ItchuaqiyaqC. U.RanadeN.WaltonR. (2021). Theory-to-query: Developing a corpus-analysis method using computer programming and human analysis. Technical Communication, 68(3), 7–28.
18.
KaminskiJ. C.HoppC. (2020). Predicting outcomes in crowdfunding campaigns with textual, visual, and linguistic signals. Small Business Economics, 55(3), 627–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00218-w
19.
MitraT.GilbertE. (2014). 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Baltimore, MD, USA, February 15–19, 2014.
MukherjeeA.YangC. L.XiaoP.ChattopadhyayA. (2017). Does the crowd support innovation? Innovation claims and success on Kickstarter. HEC Paris Research Paper No. MKG-2017-1220. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3003283
22.
NieT.WangX.ZhuY.DuS. (2020). Crowdfunding mechanism comparison when product quality is uncertain. International Transactions in Operational Research, 27(5), 2616–2657. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12612
VealeyK. P.GerdingJ. M. (2016). Rhetorical work in crowd-based entrepreneurship: Lessons learned from teaching crowdfunding as an emerging site of professional and technical communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(4), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2614742
