This article analyzes the speeches of two U.S. politicians—President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden—to present how they make their arguments about climate change using various frames. While frames are rhetorical acts, they are also a form of persuasion. In particular, the author demonstrates how Trump foregrounded negative frames with fear-inducing elements. He presented job losses and economic harm as consequences of joining the Paris Climate Accord, putting him on the defensive. In contrast, Biden utilized positive frames to strengthen his arguments and aligned more closely with the environmental justice framework. Inspired by the rhetoric of the framing strategies employed by these two speakers, the study suggests that technical communicators should focus on using language that constructs new frames to enhance the success of their argumentations.
American Presidency Project. (2020, September 14). Remarks by Vice President Joe Biden in Wilmington, Delaware on climate change (2022, November 12). https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/345118
2.
BarryB. (2005). Why social justice matters. Polity Press.
3.
CagleL. E.TilleryD. (2015). Climate change research across disciplines: The value and uses of multidisciplinary research reviews for technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.1001296
4.
ChakrabortyJ.CollinsT. W.GrineskiS. E. (2019). Exploring the environmental justice implications of Hurricane Harvey flooding in Greater Houston, Texas. American Journal of Public Health, 109(2), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304846
ErvasF.GolaE.RossiG. (2015). Metaphors and emotions as framing strategies in argumentation. EAPCogSci Proceedings, 14(19), 645–650. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1419/paper0107.pdf
FoustC. R.MurphyW. O. (2009). Revealing and reframing apocalyptic tragedy in global warming discourse. Environmental Communication, 3(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030902916624
GilliamF. D.BalesS. N. (2001). Strategic frame analysis: Reframing America’s youth giving child and youth development knowledge away. Social Policy Report, 15(3), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2001.tb00015.x
14.
HaasA.EbleM.. (Eds.) (2018). Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century. Utah State University Press.
15.
HydeM. J.SchragC. O. (2004). The ethos of rhetoric. University of South Carolina Press.
16.
JonesN. N. (2016). Narrative inquiry in human-centered design: Examining silence and voice to promote social justice in design scenarios. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653489
17.
JonesN. N.WaltonR. (2018). Using narratives to foster critical thinking about diversity and social justice. In HaasA. M.EbleM. F. (Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 241–267). Utah State University Press.
18.
KangJ.LinC. A. (2015). Effects of message framing and visual-fear appeals on smoker responses to antismoking ads. Journal of Health Communication, 20(6), 647–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1012242
LakoffG. (2014). The all new don't think of an elephant!: Know your values and frame the debate (first printing). Chelsea Green Publishing.
21.
RothmanA. J.SaloveyP. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
22.
SaldanaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative searchers. Sage.
23.
SchlosbergD. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press.
24.
SchlosbergD.CarruthersD. (2010). Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities. Global Environmental Politics, 10(4), 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00029
25.
SchlosbergD.CollinsL. B.NiemeyerS. (2017). Adaptation policy and community discourse: Risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. Environmental Politics, 26(3), 413–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1287628
26.
TracyS. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
TuttB. (2009). Frames in reports and in reporting: How framing affects global warming information in the intergovernmental panel on climate change's “summary for policymakers” and in documents written about the report. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 39(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.39.1.d
WaltonR.MooreK. R.JonesN. N. (2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn: Building coalitions for action. Routledge.
33.
WeechS. (2020). Changing climate, changing terrain: The stasis metaphor and the climate crisis. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 52(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281620966988
34.
WendlandE. R. (2010). Framing the frames: A theoretical framework for the cognitive notion of “frames of reference.”Journal of Translation, 6(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.54395/jot-ww9v6
ZimmermanB. (1993). Metaphor, frame, and nonverbal communication: An ethnographic study of a technical writing classroom. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 36(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.238054
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
