ARCO Mapping the Cognitive Dynamics of Communication Expectations: An Approach to Designing Usable Content Based on Audience Expectations

Abstract

The usability of items is connected to cognition, or how the brain processes information. Many of the related processes occur subconsciously and are guided by the mental models individuals have created based on their experiences. The better communication professional and communication students understand such dynamics, the more effectively they can create usable content for an audience. This article presents an approach, the Actualization, Recognition, Categorization, Operationalization (ARCO) method, for identifying the mental models that influence usability expectations. Individuals can use the results of this process to create content that better addresses an audience’s usability expectations.

Keywords

usability design cognition user experience design mental models methodology psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acharya

K. A.

(2016). User value and usability in technical communication: A value-proposition design model. Communication Design Quarterly, 4(3), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3071078.3071083

Acharya

K. R.

(2022). Promoting social justice through usability in technical communication: An integrative literature review. Technical Communication, 69(1), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.55177/tc584938

Aitchison

(1994). Bad birds and better birds: Prototype theory. In Clark

V. P.

Eschholz

P. A.

Rosa

A. F.

(Eds.), Language: Introductory Readings (4th ed, pp. 445–459). St. Martin’s Press.

Albers

M. J.

(2012). Human-information interaction and technical communication: Concepts and frameworks. IGI Global.

Arasaratnam

L. A.

(2014). Ten years of research in intercultural communication competence (2003–2013): A retrospective. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 35(5), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2007.9674715

Barber

Badre

(1998, June). Culturability: The merging of culture and usability. In Rubart

Atzenbeck

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Human Factors in Hypertext (pp. 1–10). Association for Computing Machinery.

Bargh

J. A.

Morsella

(2008). The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00064.x

Batova

(2010). Writing for the participants of international clinical trials: Law, ethics, and culture. Technical Communication, 57(3), 266–281.

Beck

C. E.

(1994). Perspectives on the self in communication: The cognition continuum and the Johari Window. Technical Communication, 41(4), 753–756.

10.

Berkenkotter

Huckin

T. N.

(1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Routledge.

11.

Boichuk

(2020). The nine principles of UX design psychology: Can you predict the behavior of your users? UX Magazine, Retrieved, from https://uxmag.com/articles/the-nine-principles-of-ux-design-psychology-can-you-predict-the-behavior-of-your-users.

12.

Brand

A. G.

(1987). The why of cognition: Emotion and the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 38(4), 436–443. https://doi.org/10.2307/357637

13.

Buxton

(2007). Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann.

14.

Carliner

(2000). Physical, cognitive, and affective: A three-part framework for information design. Technical Communication, 47(4), 561–576.

15.

Cham

Shakiry

Yates

(2021). Dual cognitive UXD and explainable AI. Journal of Usability Studies, 17(1), 1–11.

16.

Chen

G. M.

Starosta

W. J.

(1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 19(1), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1996.11678935

17.

Cheung

I. W.

(2017). Plain language to minimize cognitive load: A social justice perspective. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(4), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2759639

18.

Clarke

Cornelissen

(2011). Language, communication, and socially situated cognition in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 776–778. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0192

19.

Cleary

Flammia

(2012). Preparing technical communication students to function as user advocates in a self-service society. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.42.3.g

20.

Cognition (2022). APA Dictionary of Psychology – American Psychological Association. Retrieved, from https://dictionary.apa.org/cognition.

21.

Content strategy basics (2022). usability.gov. Retrieved, from https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/content-strategy.html.

22.

Context of use (n.d.). Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved, from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-glossary-of-human-computer-interaction/context-of-use.

23.

Cook

M. P.

(2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1073–1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20164

24.

Cooke

(2010). Assessing concurrent think-aloud protocol as a usability test method: A technical communication approach. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2010.2052859

25.

Cooke

Mings

(2005). Connecting usability education and research with industry needs and practices. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(3), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2005.853938

26.

Ćwik

(2021). Why usability is key to your digital product success? KISS Digital. Retrieved, from https://kissdigital.com/blog/why-usability-is-key-to-your-digital-product-success.

27.

Dube

(2021). The psychology in UX design-mental models. DVT Software Engineering. Retrieved, from https://medium.com/dvt-engineering/mental-models-c9b0f95144.

28.

Escandell-Vidal

(2009). Social cognition and intercultural communication. Intercultural business communication and simulations and gaming methodology. In Guillén Nieto

Vargas-Sierra

Marimón-Llorca

(Eds.), Intercultural Business Communication and Simulation and Gaming Methodology (pp. 65–96). Peter Lang.

29.

Eyal

(2014). Hooked: How to build habit-forming products. Portfolio/Penguin Books.

30.

Fussell

S. R.

Kreuz

R. J.

(Eds.) (2014). Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication. Psychology Press.

31.

Garner

J. K.

Alley

Gaudelli

A. F.

Zappe

S. E.

(2009). Common use of PowerPoint versus the assertion–evidence structure. Technical Communication, 56(4), 331–345.

32.

German

T. P.

Barrett

H. C.

(2005). Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psychological Science, 16(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00771.x

33.

Gibbs

W. J.

(2008). Examining users on news provider websites: A review of methodology. Journal of Usability Studies, 3(3), 129–148.

34.

Hailey

D. E.

Hailey

(1998). Hypermedia, multimedia, and reader cognition: An empirical study. Technical Communication, 45(3), 330–342.

35.

Honeycutt

J. M.

Cantrill

J. G.

(2014). Cognition, communication, and romantic relationships. Routledge.

36.

Imhof

Välikoski

T. R.

Laukkanen

A. M.

Orlob

(2014). Cognition and interpersonal communication: The effect of voice quality on information processing and person perception. Studies in Communication Sciences, 14(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2014.03.011

37.

Keränen

Syrjälä

Salonen

Takkinen

(2016). The usability of the annotation. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpus Mining (pp. 111–116). Institute for German Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf.

38.

Killingsworth

M. J.

Rosenberg

M. E.

(1995). The icon as a problem in cognition and social construction: Complexity and consensual domains in technical rhetoric. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 38(4), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.475593

39.

Koerner

(2007). Social cognition in family communication: Family communication patterns theory. In Roskos-Ewoldsen

D. R.

Monahan

J. L.

(Eds.), Communication and Social Cognition: Theories and Methods (pp. 197–216). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

40.

Koerner

F. A.

Mary Anne

(2002). Understanding family communication patterns and family functioning: The roles of conversation orientation and conformity orientation. Annals of the International Communication Association, 26(1), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2002.11679010

41.

Koyanagi

(2018). Impact of intercultural communication during short-term study-abroad of Japanese students: Analysis from a perspective of cognitive modification. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 47(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2018.1435423

42.

Kushniruk

A. W.

Patel

V. L.

(2004). Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 37(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2004.01.003

43.

Lindstrom

(2010). Buyology: Truth and lies about why we buy. Broadway Books.

44.

Liu

Yang

(2021). Public support for COVID-19 responses: Cultural cognition, risk perception, and emotions. Health Communication, 38, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1965710

45.

March

(1994). Usability: the new dimension of product design. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved, from https://hbr.org/1994/09/usability-the-new-dimension-of-product-design.

46.

Martin

(2021). 5 Cognitive psychology theories that contribute to the quality of UX design. UX Magazine. Retrieved, from https://uxmag.com/articles/5-cognitive-psychology-theories-that-contribute-to-the-quality-of-ux-design.

47.

McCaffrey

(2012). Innovation relries on the obscure. Psychological Science, 23(3), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429580

48.

McDonald

Edwards

H. M.

Zhao

(2012). Exploring think-alouds in usability testing: An international survey. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2011.2182569

49.

McNely

Spinuzzi

Teston

(2015). Contemporary research methodologies in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975958

50.

Meek

(2013). Basics of communication: The communication basics we all need to know. Psychology Today. Retrieved, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/notes-self/201307/basics-communication.

51.

Miller

C. R.

(1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686

52.

Miller

C. R.

Selzer

(1985). Special topics of argument in engineering reports. In Odell

Goswami

(Eds.), Writing in Non-Academic Settings (pp. 309–341). New York: Guilford Publications.

53.

Morales

(2020). All you need to know about iterative usability testing. Adobe XD Ideas. Retrieved, from https://xd.adobe.com/ideas/process/user-testing/process-user-testing-iterative-usability-testing-best-practices/.

54.

Nielsen

(2012a). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/.

55.

Nielsen

(2012b). Thinking aloud: The #1 usability tool. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/thinking-aloud-the-1-usability-tool/.

56.

Nielsen

(1997). The use and misuse of focus groups. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/focus-groups/.

57.

Nielsen

(2010). Interviewing users. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/interviewing-users/.

58.

Norman

(2002). The design of everyday things. Basic Books.

59.

Norman

. (2005). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.

60.

Pass

Renkl

Sweller

(2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021806.17516.d0

61.

Pernice

(2018). User interviews: How, when, and why to conduct them. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/user-interviews/.

62.

Planalp

(1993). Communication, cognition, and emotion. Communications Monographs, 60(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376288

63.

Pope-Ruark

Tham

Moses

Conner

(2019). Introduction to special issue: Design-thinking approaches in technical and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 370–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919854054

64.

Prastawa

Ciptomulyono

Laksono-Singgih

Hartono

(2019). The effect of cognitive and affective aspects on usability. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20(4), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2018.1547458

65.

Redish

(2010). Technical communication and usability: Intertwined strands and mutual influences. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2010.2052861

66.

Redish

J. C.

Selzer

(1985). The place of readability formulas in technical communication. Technical Communication, 32(4), 46–52.

67.

Rivers

N. A.

(2011). Future convergences: Technical communication research as cognitive science. Technical Communication Quarterly, 20(4), 412–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2011.591650

68.

Rosch

(1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch

Lloyd

B. L.

(Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 27–48). Lawrence Erlbaum.

69.

Roskos-Ewoldsen

D. R.

Monahan

J. L.

(Eds.). (2007). Communication and social cognition: Theories and methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

70.

Sanborn

F. W.

Harris

R. J.

(2018). A cognitive psychology of mass communication (7th ed). Routledge.

71.

Schank

R. C.

Abelson

R. P.

(1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Erlbaum Associates.

72.

Siau

Tan

(2005). Technical communication in information systems development: The use of cognitive mapping. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2005.853933

73.

Sillars

Parry

(1982). Stress, cognition, and communication in interpersonal conflicts. Communication Research, 9(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650820090020

74.

Soderston

(1985). The usability edit: A new level. Technical Communication, 32(1), 16–18.

75.

Soegaard

Dam

R. F.

(n.d.). The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (2nd ed). Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved, from https://public-assets.interaction-design.org/ebooks/hci/hci.pdf.

76.

Spinuzzi

(2004). Four ways to investigate assemblages of texts: Genre sets, systems, repertoires, and ecologies. In Tilley

Huang

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual international conference on Design of communication: The engineering of quality documentation (pp. 110–116). Association for Computing Machinery.

77.

Spinuzzi

Nelson

Thomson

K. S.

Lorenzini

French

R. A.

Pogue

Burback

S. D.

Momberger

(2014). Making the pitch: Examining dialogue and revisions in entrepreneurs’ pitch decks. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(3), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2342354

78.

St.Amant

(2005). A prototype theory approach to international website analysis and design. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1401_6

79.

St.Amant

(2018). Reflexes, reactions, and usability: Examining how prototypes of place can enhance UXD practices. Communication Design Quarterly, 6(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230970.3230976

80.

St.Amant

(2019). Ethos prototypes: The intersection of rhetoric, cognition, and communicating health policy internationally. World Medical and Health Policy, 11(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.323

81.

St.Amant

(2022). Context, cognition, and the dynamics of design thinking: Cognitive methods for understanding the situational variables affecting usable design. Technical Communication, 69(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.55177/tc796562

82.

Sun

. (2012). Cross-cultural technology design: Creating culture-sensitive technology for local users. New York: Oxford University Press.

83.

Sweller

(1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

84.

System Concepts (n.d.). How mental models enhance usability. Retrieved, from https://www.system-concepts.com/insights/how-mental-models-enhance-usability/.

85.

The Economist (2017, Feb. 9). The battle for consumers’ attention: Forget the long tail. Retrieved, from https://www.economist.com/special-report/2017/02/09/the-battle-for-consumers-attention.

86.

Theiss

J. A.

Solomon

D. H.

(2006). Coupling longitudinal data and multilevel modeling to examine the antecedents and consequences of jealousy experiences in romantic relationships: A test of the relational turbulence model. Human Communication Research, 32(4), 469–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00284.x

87.

Tomkins

S. S.

(1978). Script theory: Differential magnification of affects. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 26, 201–236.

88.

Tomkins

S. S.

(1987). Script theory. In Arnoff

Rabin

A. I.

Zucker

R. A.

(Eds.), The Emergence of Personality (pp. 147–216). Springer.

89.

Tse

Langston

R. F.

Kakeyama

Bethus

Spooner

P. A.

Wood

E. R.

Witter

M. P.

Morris

R. G. M.

(2007). Schemas and memory consolidation. Science, 316(76), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1135935

90.

Tullis

Albert

(2013). Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Morgan Kaufmann.

91.

Tyrkiel

(2021). How mental models affect both users and designers. Editor X. Retrieved, from https://www.editorx.com/shaping-design/article/mental-models.

92.

User-Centered Design Basics (2022). usability.gov. Retrieved, from https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/user-centered-design.html.

93.

UXness (2018). What is the subconscious mind? Retrieved, from https://medium.com/uxness/what-is-the-subconscious-mind-fc7ce9d3162f.

94.

van Merrienboer

J. J. G.

Sweller

(2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: Design principles and strategies. Medical Education, 44(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x

95.

Verhulsdonck

Howard

Tham

(2021). Investigating the impact of design thinking, content strategy, and artificial intelligence: A “streams” approach for technical communication and user experience. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(4), 468–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211041951

96.

Verhulsdonck

Shalamova

(2020). Creating content that influences people: Considering user experience and behavioral design in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 50(4), 376–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728161988028

97.

Virtanen

(2011). Text, discourse, and cognition: An introduction. In Virtanen

(Ed.), Approaches to Cognition Through Text and Discourse (pp. 1–16). Walter de Gruyter.

98.

Wendel

(2021). Designing for behavior change: Applying psychology and behavioral economics (2nd ed). O’Reilly.

99.

What is Cognition (n.d.). Psychology – OpenStaxCollege. Retrieved, from https://opentext.wsu.edu/psych105nusbaum/chapter/what-is-cognition/.

100.

Williams-Piehota

Schneider

T. R.

Pizarro

Mowad

Salovey

(2003). Matching health messages to information-processing styles: Need for cognition and mammography utilization. Health Communication, 15(4), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1504_01

101.

Winsor

D. A.

(2001). Learning to do knowledge work in systems of distributed cognition. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/105065190101500101

102.

Wolfe

J. M.

(1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(2), 202–238. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200774

103.

Wolfe

J. M.

(2007). Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems. Oxford University Press.

104.

Xiaohui

(2011). Teacher cognition of intercultural communicative competence in the Chinese ELT context. Intercultural Communication Studies, 20(1), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939516

105.

Yablonsky

(2020). Laws of UX: Using psychology to design better products & services. O’Reilly.

106.

Yamada

Itsukushima

(2013). The effects of schema on recognition memories and subjective experiences for actions and objects. Japanese Psychological Research, 55(4), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12016

107.

Yocco

V. S.

(2016). Design for the mind: Seven psychological principles of persuasive design. Manning.

108.

Young

(2011). How audiences decide: A cognitive approach to business communication. Routledge.