A Study of Lexical Repetition and the Comprehensibility of Single-Sourced Technical Documents

Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which lexical repetition in English passages developed in a content management system appeared to affect reading comprehension. Participants were 65 graduate students at a Midwestern public university, all of whom were native English readers. Instruments were two passages adjusted to maximize or minimize internal lexical repetition. Readers rated repetitive texts as significantly more cohesive than nonrepetitive texts, although repetition did not significantly affect the accuracy of task-based responses. Participants named lexical cues that had been repeated but also named nonrepeated, memorable cues, suggesting possible future research into managed content, lexical memorableness, and reader comprehension.

Keywords

managed content single sourcing lexical repetition comprehensibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ainsworth

Burcham

(2007). The impact of text coherence on learning by self-explanation. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.004

Albers

M. J.

(2000). The technical editor and document databases: What the future may hold. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250009364693

Alderson

J. C.

(2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge University Press.

Ament

(2003). Single sourcing: Building modular documentation. William Andrew.

Andersen

Batova

(2015). The current state of component content management: An integrative literature review. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 58(3), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2516619

Bacha

(2008). Single sourcing and the return to positivism: The threat of plain-style, arhetorical technical communication practices. In Pullman

(Eds.), Content management: Bridging the gap between theory and practice (pp. 143–159). Baywood.

Bailie

R. A.

Huset

(2015). The effect of CMS technology on writing styles and processes: Two case studies. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 58(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2516642

Bailie

R. A.

Urbina

(2013). Content strategy. XML Press.

Batova

Andersen

(2017). A systematic literature review of changes in roles/skills in component content management environments and implications for education. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2017.1287958

10.

Bensoussan

(1990). Redundancy and the cohesion cloze. Journal of Research in Reading, 13(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1990.tb00320.x

11.

Boiko

(2002). The content management Bible. Hungry Minds.

12.

Campbell

K. S.

(1991). Structural cohesion in technical texts. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 21(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.2190/01JA-T7UX-7UY8-4U03

13.

Campbell

K. S.

(1995). Coherence, continuity, and cohesion: Theoretical foundations for document design. Lawrence Erlbaum.

14.

Carliner

(2020). Content management: Preparing technical communication students for the realities of the workplace. In Bridgeford

(Ed.), Teaching content management in technical communication (pp. 40–56). Routledge.

15.

Coggio

G. L.

(2015). Technical communicators as agents and adopters of change: A case study of the implementation of an early content-management system. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 58(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2516618

16.

Freebody

Anderson

R. C.

(1983). Effects of vocabulary difficulty, text cohesion, and schema availability on Reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(3), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/747389

17.

Gattis

L. F.

Kennison

S. M.

Payton

M. E.

Warren

T. L.

(2007, May 13–16). Effect of repetition on cohesiveness of single-sourced documents [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Conference of the Society for Technical Communication, Minneapolis (Vol. 54, p. 8)

18.

Geiger

J. F.

Millis

K. K.

(2004). Assessing the impact of reading goals and text structures on comprehension [electronic version]. Reading Psychology, 25(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710490435637

19.

Goldman

S. R.

Murray

J. D.

(1992). Knowledge of connectors as cohesion devices in text: A comparative study of native-English and English-as-a-second language speakers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 504–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.504

20.

Gollner

(2009). The emergence of intelligent content. The evolution of open content technologies and their significance. [Online] jgollner.typepad.com/files/the-emergence-of-intelligent-content-jgollner-jan-2009.pdf.

21.

Gollner

Andersen

Gollner

Webster

(2015). A study of the usefulness of deploying a questionnaire to identify cultural dynamics potentially affecting a content-management project. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 58(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2516638

22.

Grabe

Kaplan

R. B.

(1996). Theory and practice of writing. Addison Wesley Longman.

23.

Hackos

(2002). Content management for dynamic web delivery. John Wiley.

24.

Halliday

M. A. K.

Hasan

(1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.

25.

Halliday

M. A. K.

Hasan

(1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). University Press.

26.

Hoey

(1983). On the surface of discourse. George Allen & Unwin.

27.

Hoey

(1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford University Press.

28.

Horiba

(1996). Comprehension processes in L2 reading: Language competence, textual coherence, and inferences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 433–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015370

29.

Horton

(1994). Designing and writing online documentation (2nd ed.). John Wiley.

30.

Houser

A. R.

(2003). Managing and delivering your content as data. Intercom, 50(1), 13–16.

31.

Johnsen

(2001). Document (re)presentation: Object-orientation, visual language, and XML. Technical Communication, 48(1), 59–65.

32.

Kamalski

Sanders

Lentz

(2008). Coherence marking, prior knowledge, and comprehension of informative and persuasive texts: Sorting things out. Discourse Processes, 45(4/5), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802145486

33.

Kintsch

Yarbrough

J. C.

(1982). Role of rhetorical structure in text comprehension. Educational Psychology, 74(6), 828–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.6.828

34.

Lorch

R. F.

(1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320135

35.

MacLean

Chapman

L. J.

(1989). The processing of cohesion in fiction and non-fiction by good and poor readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 12(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1989.tb00300.x

36.

Mahlberg

(2006). Lexical cohesion: Corpus linguistic theory and its application in English language teaching. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.3.08mah

37.

Morley

(2006). Lexical cohesion and rhetorical structure. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.3.03mor

38.

Pander Maat

Lentz

(2010). Improving the usability of patient information leaflets. Patient Information and Counseling, 80(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.030

39.

Pennington

L. L.

(2007). Surviving the design and implementation of a content-management system. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651906293530

40.

Price, J. (2003). Chunking content: Toward a rhetoric of objects. [Electronic version]. Proceedings of the Society for Technical Communication, 50, 147–152.

41.

Robidoux

(2008). Rhetorically structured content: Developing a collaborative single-sourcing curriculum. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 110–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250701595652

42.

Rockley

(2001). Dynamic content management. Intercom, 48(2), 28–32, 42.

43.

Rockley

(2003a). Managing enterprise content: A unified content strategy. New Riders.

44.

Rockley

(2003b). Single sourcing: It’s about people, not just technology. Technical Communication, 50(3), 350–354.

45.

Sanders

T. J. M.

Noordman

L. G. M.

(2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes, 29(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2901_3

46.

Sapienza

(2007). A rhetorical approach to single-sourcing via intertextuality. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250709336578

47.

Selzer

(1982). Certain cohesion elements and the readability of technical paragraphs. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 12(4), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728168201200403

48.

Spyridakis

J. H.

(1989). Signaling effects: Increased content retention and new answers—part II. Journal of Technical Writing & Communication, 19(4), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.2190/493Q-703B-JBVD-E0T9

49.

Spyridakis

J. H.

Standal

T. C.

(1986). Headings, previews, logical connectives: Effects on Reading comprehension. Journal of Technical Writing & Communication, 16(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.2190/EJTB-98T6-T66W-4NTA

50.

Thompson

(1986). Readability beyond the sentence: Global coherence and ease of comprehension. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 16(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.2190/6J1F-DATG-1275-JTFK

51.

Tyler

(1994). The role of repetition in perceptions of discourse coherence. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90103-1

52.

Ulijn

J. M.

Salager-Meyer

(1998). The professional reader and the text: Insights from L2 research. Journal of Research in Reading, 21(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00046

53.

Ulijn

J. M.

Strother

J. B.

(1995). Communicating in business and technology: From psycholinguistic theory to international practice. Peter Lang.

54.

Van Ittersum

(2009). Distributing memory: Rhetorical work in digital environments. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250902942026

55.

Whittemore

(2008). Metadata and memory: Lessons from the canon of memoria for the design of content management systems. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 88–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250701590893

56.

Williams

J. M.

(1990). Style: Toward clarity and grace (4th ed.). University Press.

57.

Williams

J. M.

(2005). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace (8th ed.). Longman.

58.

Yeats

Hull

(2004). Ten problems with single sourcing [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Conference of the Society for Technical Communication, Baltimore (Vol. 51, pp. 251–255).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB