Visual Representation & Visible Boundaries in Online Postpartum Depression Support Groups

Abstract

The American Psychological Association notes that approximately one in seven women will experience postpartum depression (PPD) after giving birth. Finding support can help lead to better outcomes for those suffering from PPD. This article examines cover photos of PPD support groups on Facebook. By arguing that these photos construct rhetorical boundaries that support-seekers must cross to access PPD resources, the article expands our current understandings of rhetorical boundaries and calls for increased attention to visual selection in high-stakes health contexts. This article emphasizes the idea that we might transform visual boundaries, like the Facebook cover photos studied here, into rhetorical boundary objects that promote inclusivity through more thoughtful and representative image selection.

Keywords

visual representation visible boundaries online support groups postpartum depression

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(1996). Ethics and visual rhetorics: Seeing’s not believing anymore. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq0501_6

American Psychological Association (2008). What is postpartum depression and anxiety? American Psychology Association. Retrieved June 1, 2022, from https://www.apa.org/pi/women/resources/reports/postpartum-depression

Arola

K. L.

(2010). The design of Web 2.0: The rise of the template, the fall of design. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.004

Barton

B. F.

Barton

M. S.

(1993). Modes of power in technical and professional visuals. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7(1), 138–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651993007001007

Blanco

C. F.

Sarasa

R. G.

Sanclemente

C. O.

(2010). Effects of visual and textual information in online product presentations: Looking for the best combination in website design. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(6), 668–686. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.42

The Blue Dot Project (2022). About the blue dot. The Blue Dot Project. Retrieved June 1, 2022, from https://www.thebluedotproject.org/about

Boero

Pascoe

C. J.

(2012). Pro-anorexia communities and online interaction: Bringing the pro-ana body online. Body & Society, 18(2), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X12440827

Boylorn

R. M.

(2008). As seen on TV: An autoethnographic reflection on race and reality television. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 25(4), 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030802327758

Burgoon

J. K.

Buller

D. B.

Hale

J. L.

de Turck

M. A.

(1984). Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Human Communication Research, 10(3), 351–378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624177

10.

Carilli

Campbell

(Eds.) (2012). Challenging images of women in the media: Reinventing women’s lives. Lexington Books.

11.

Cherny

(1999). Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world (No. hal-02297990). Retrieved June 1, 2022, from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02297990.html

12.

Cyr

Head

Larios

Bing

(2009). Exploring human images in website design: A multi-method approach. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 539–5A9. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650308

13.

Eichhorn

K. C.

(2008). Soliciting and providing social support over the internet: An investigation of online eating disorder support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01431.x

14.

Evans

Donelle

Hume-Loveland

(2012). Social support and online postpartum depression discussion groups: A content analysis. Patient Education and Counseling, 87(3), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.09.011

15.

Foss

S. K.

(2004). Theory of visual rhetoric. In Smith

K. L.

Moriarty

Kenney

Barbatsis

(Eds.), Handbook of visual communication (pp. 163–174). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611581.ch11

16.

Gefen

Straub

D. W.

(2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega, 32(6), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006

17.

Gieryn

T. F.

(1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325

18.

Gries

(2015). Still life with rhetoric: A new materialist approach for visual rhetorics. University Press of Colorado.

19.

Hiland

E. B.

(2021). Therapy Tech: The digital transformation of mental health. University of Minnesota Press.

20.

Honeycutt

(2005). Hazing as a process of boundary maintenance in an online community. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2), JCMC1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00240.x

21.

Houf

J. R.

(2020). Boundary work and boundary objects: Synthesizing two concepts for moments of controversy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(3), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281620947355

22.

Hum

N. J.

Chamberlin

P. E.

Hambright

B. L.

Portwood

A. C.

Schat

A. C.

Bevan

J. L.

(2011). A picture is worth a thousand words: A content analysis of Facebook profile photographs. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1828–1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.003

23.

Kinross

(1985). The rhetoric of neutrality. Design Issues, 2(2), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511415

24.

Kostelnick

(2008). The visual rhetoric of data displays: The conundrum of clarity. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 51(4), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2007.908725

25.

Leavitt

P. A.

Covarrubias

Perez

Y. A.

Fryberg

S. A.

(2015). “Frozen in time”: The impact of native American media representations on identity and self-understanding. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12095

26.

Manago

A. M.

Graham

M. B.

Greenfield

P. M.

Salimkhan

(2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.001

27.

Muckelbauer

(2016). Aristotelian, cultural, and heliotropic. In Zabrowski

Teston

Sackey

D. J.

Rutherford

Rivers

N. A.

Rickert

Barnett

(Eds.), Rhetoric, through everyday things (pp. 30–41). The University of Alabama Press.

28.

National Institute of Mental Health. (2022). Postpartum depression. National Institute of Mental Health. Retrieved June 1, 2022, from https://www.nimh.nih.gov/research/research-conducted-at-nimh/research-areas/clinics-and-labs/sbe/participate-in-research/postpartum-depression.shtml

29.

“Postpartum Depression and Suicide Depression – Each One Teach One Group.”. Facebook. Retrieved October 22, 2019 from https://www.facebook.com/groups/243999549690266

30.

Rogers

L. E.

Escudero

(2004). Theoretical foundations. In Rogers

L. E.

Escudero

(Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 3–22). Erlbaum.

31.

Salinas

(2002). Technical rhetoricians and the art of configuring images. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1102_4

32.

Schwalbe

Holden

Schrock

Godwin

Thompson

Wolkomir

(2000). Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces, 79(2), 419–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/2675505

33.

Segal

(2005). Health and the rhetoric of medicine. Southern Indiana University Press.

34.

Shaw

L. H.

Gant

L. M.

(2002). Users divided? Exploring the gender gap in Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(6), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102321018150

35.

Short

Williams

Christie

(1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.

36.

Sibak

(2009). Constructing the self through the photo selection-visual impression management on social networking websites. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3, 1–6.

37.

Singer

S. A.

Jack

(2020). Theorizing chronicity: Rhetoric, representation, and identification on Pinterest. In Melonçon

L. K.

Graham

S. S.

Johnson

J. M.

Lynch

J. J. A.

Ryan

(Eds.), Rhetoric of health and medicine as/is: Theories and approaches for the field (pp. 123–142). The Ohio State University Press.

38.

Spangler

(2014). Faculty users on Facebook: What we can learn from women academics-mothers’ rhetorical methods for visual self-presentation online. In Hickey

D. J.

Essid

(Eds.), Identity and leadership in virtual communities: Establishing credibility and influence (pp. 121–143). IGI Global.

39.

Star

S. L.

Griesemer

J. R.

(1989). Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001

40.

Strano

M. M.

(2008). User descriptions and interpretations of self-presentation through Facebook profile images. Cyberpsychology, 2(2).

41.

“Support Group for Depression, Anxiety and Postpartum.” Facebook. Retrieved October 22, 2019 from https://www.facebook.com/groups/940862719298781

42.

Van House

N. A.

(2011). Feminist HCI meets Facebook: Performativity and social networking sites. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.03.003

43.

Walther

J. B.

(1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43.

44.

Wilson

Herndl

C. G.

(2007). Boundary objects as rhetorical exigence: Knowledge mapping and interdisciplinary cooperation at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651906297164

45.

Windsor

L. C.

Jemal

Alessi

E. J.

(2015). Cognitive behavioral therapy: A metaanalysis of race and substance use outcomes. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(2), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037929

46.

(2014). Should I trust him? The effects of reviewer profile characteristics on eWOM credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.027

47.

Yeshua-Katz

Martins

(2013). Communicating stigma: The pro-ana paradox. Health Communication, 28(5), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.699889