This article combines historical research with demographic analysis and neoliberal/rhetorical critique to put forth the concept of slow civic violence—indirect injuries on civic process, particularly within marginalized communities. The author ties the United States Postal Service's (USPS) rationale for removing mail sorting machines during the 2020 election year to systemic moves that damage democratic participation. The author conducts an empirical analysis of where the USPS mail sorting machines were removed to show how neoliberal arguments in favor of cost cutting make voting by mail a more precarious and uncertain act primarily for those who reside in communities of color.
AndersonC. (2018). One person, no vote: How voter suppression is destroying our democracy. Bloomsbury.
2.
BanksA. J. (2006). Race, rhetoric, and technology: Searching for higher ground. Routledge.
3.
BeesleyM. E.LittlechildS. C., (1997). Privatization: Principles, problems and priorities. In MichaelE. B. (Ed.) Privatization, regulation and deregulation (pp. 22–37). Routledge.
4.
BenjaminR. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Social Forces.
5.
BermanA. (2015). Give us the ballot: The modern struggle for voting rights in America. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
6.
BivensK. M.ColeK.HeiligL. (2020). The activist syllabus as technical communication and the technical communicator as curator of public intellectualism. Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1635211
BraedleyS.LuxtonM. (2010). Neoliberalism and everyday life. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
10.
BrennanM. J. (2019). Statement of postmaster general and chief executive officer Megan J.Brennan. Statement before the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform, Washington, D.C., April 30, 2019.
11.
BridgewaterM. (2018). Ethos in electoral technology company web spaces. Technical Communication, 65(4), 422–431.
12.
BrownW. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism's stealth revolution. MIT Press.
13.
CarbaughR. (2007). The future of the US postal service. Cato Journal, 27, 459–480.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (2020, September 16). Guidance for cleaning and disinfecting. CDC.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/disinfecting-your-home.pdf.
ColvinJ. (2018, April 10). Trump signs executive order pushing work for welfare. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/6e1cc4a1ebf14cd0bba369254670c8eb.
18.
ÇalışkanK.CallonM. (2009). Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38(3), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020580
19.
DayleyC. (2020). Student perceptions of diversity in technical and professional communication academic programs. Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1635210
20.
DeJoyL. (2020, August 24). Statement of postmaster general and chief executive officer. https://about.usps.com/newsroom/testimony-speeches/082420-pmg-statement.htm.
21.
Dorpenyo, I., & Agboka, G. (2018). Technical communication and election technologies. Technical Communication, 65(4), 349–352.
22.
DorpenyoI. K. (2019). Risky election, vulnerable technology: Localizing biometric use in elections for the sake of justice. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1610502
23.
DugganL. (2012). The twilight of equality?: Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Beacon Press.
24.
EdwardsC. (2019). Restructuring the U.S. Postal service. Cato Journal, 39(3), 667–681.
25.
Election technology toolkit: Voting machines and beyond (2016, August 30). Retrieved from National Conference of State Legislatures: http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/elections-technology-toolkit.aspx.
26.
GallagherW. (2016). How the post office created America: A history. Penguin.
27.
GurleyL. K. (2021, March 25). Amazon denies workers pee in bottles. here are the pee bottles. Vice.com. https://www.vice.com/en/article/k7amyn/amazon-denies-workers-pee-in-bottles-here-are-the-pee-bottles.
28.
HaasA. M. (2012). Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 277–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912439539
29.
HohleR. (2015). Race and the origins of American neoliberalism. Routledge.
30.
JohnsonJ. R.PimentelO.PimentelC. (2008). Writing New Mexico white: A critical analysis of early representations of New Mexico in technical writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651907311928
31.
JonesN. N.MooreK. R.WaltonR. (2016). Disrupting the past to disrupt the future: An antenarrative of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1224655
32.
JonesN. N.WilliamsM. F. (2018). Technologies of disenfranchisement: Literacy tests and black voters in the US from 1890 to 1965. Technical Communication, 65(4), 371–386.
33.
KosarK. R. (2009). The postal accountability and enhancement act: Overview and issues for congress. Congressional Research Service, Report no. R40983, December 14, 2009.
34.
LedbetterL. (2018). The rhetorical work of YouTube’s beauty community: Relationship-and identity-building in user-created procedural discourse. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(4), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2018.1518950
35.
LiL. (2020). Visualizing Chinese immigrants in the US statistical atlases: A case study in charting and mapping the other(s). Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1690695
MaragakisL. L. (2020, July 15). Coronavirus, social and physical distancing and self-quarantine. Johns Hopkins Medicine. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/coronavirus-social-distancing-and-self-quarantine.
39.
MartichouxA. (2021, August 9). USPS slowing some mail delivery starting Oct 1: These states will see biggest delays. News10.com. https://www.news10.com/news/usps-slowing-some-mail-delivery-starting-oct-1-these-states-will-see-biggest-delays/).
40.
MedinaC. (2014). Tweeting collaborative identity: Race, identity and performing latinidad. In WilliamsM. F.PimentelO. (Eds.), Communicating race, ethnicity, and identity in technical communication (pp. 63–86). Baywood.
41.
MercilleJ.MurphyE. M. (2015). Deepening neoliberalism, austerity, and crisis: Europe’s treasure Ireland. Springer.
42.
MooreK. (2018). Black feminist epistemology as a framework for community-based teaching. In WilliamsM. F.PimentelO. (Eds.), Communicating race, ethnicity, and identity in technical communication (pp. 186–211). Baywood.
43.
MorrisseyM. (2021). The war against the postal service. Economic policy institute. https://www.epi.org/publication/the-war-against-the-postal-service/.
44.
NixonR. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press.
45.
PicchiA. (2018, April 19). Inside an Amazon warehouse: “Treating human beings as robots.” CBSNews.com. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/inside-an-amazon-warehouse-treating-human-beings-as-robots/.
46.
PicchiA. (2021, April 5). Amazon apologizes for denying that its drivers pee in bottles. CBSnews.com. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/amazon-drivers-peeing-in-bottles-union-vote-worker-complaints/.
47.
PimentelChariseBalzhiserDeborah (2012). The double occupancy of Hispanics: Counting race and ethnicity in the US census.Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 311–339.
48.
PryorL. (2017). Designing for a culturally inclusive democracy: A case study of voter registration outreach postcards in latino communities. Technical Communication, 64(2), 154–165.
49.
RavitchD. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to america’s public schools. Alfred A. Knopf.
50.
RiceJ. (2012). Distant publics: Development rhetoric and the subject of crisis. University of Pittsburgh Press.
51.
Sano-FranchiniJ. (2018). Designing outrage, programming discord: A critical interface analysis of facebook as a campaign technology. Technical Communication, 65(4), 387–410.
52.
SánchezF. (2018). Racial gerrymandering and geographic information systems: Subverting the 2011 Texas district map with election technologies. Technical Communication, 65(4), 354–370.
53.
SánchezF.DorpenyoI.Sano-FranchiniJ. (2021). Election technologies as a tool for cultivating civic literacies in technical communication: A case of the redistricting game. In WaltonR.AgbokaG. Y. (Eds.), Equipping technical communicators for social justice work: Theories, methodologies, and pedagogies (pp. 199–213). Utah State University Press.
54.
SchuylerM. A. (2000). The postal service’s market grab. In HudginsE. (Ed.), Mail @ the millennium: Will the postal service go private? (pp. 25–44). CATO Institute.
55.
ScottT.WelchN. (2016). Composition in the age of austerity. Utah State University Press.
56.
SheltonC. (2020). Shifting out of neutral: Centering difference, bias, and social justice in a business writing course. Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1640287
57.
SunH. (2012). Cross-cultural technology design: Creating culture-sensitive technology for local users. Oxford University Press.
58.
SunH. (1982). Global social media design: Bridging differences across cultures. Oxford University Press.
ThompsonD. (2020, May 26). Social distancing is not enough. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/05/how-will-we-ever-be-safe-inside/611953/.
61.
TompkinsL. (2021, June 3). Who is postmaster general Louis DeJoy? New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/article/general-louis-dejoy-postmaster.html.
62.
United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General (USPS OIG) (2016). Peeling the Onion: The Real Cost of Mail. Report no. RARC-WP-16-009, April 18, 2016. (uspsoig.gov).
63.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2011). AFSM 100: National standardization guide. PRC.gov. https://www.prc.gov/docs/30/30058/USPS-LR-J-173a.pdf.
64.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2006). Annual report 2006. USPS.com. https://about.usps.com/what/financials/annual-reports/fy2006.pdf.
65.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2007). Annual report 2007. USPS.com. https://about.usps.com/what/financials/annual-reports/fy2007.pdf.
66.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2012, August 6). Advanced facer canceller system. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/60774464809/posts/10151166134069810/.
67.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2014, January 1). Flats sequencing systems FAQ. USPS.com. https://postalpro.usps.com/node/621.
68.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2015a, January 6). What’s a DBCS? USPS.com. https://link.usps.com/tips_of_the_day/whats-a-dbcs/).
69.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2015b, January 13). What’s an AFCS? USPS.com. https://link.usps.com/tips_of_the_day/whats-an-afcs/).
70.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2020a). Top thirteen things you should know about the U.S. Postal Service. USPS.com. https://facts.usps.com/top-facts/.
71.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2020b, May 15). Equipment Reduction. 21st Century Postal Worker. https://www.21cpw.com/usps-equipment-reduction-plan/.
72.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2021a). About the United States Postal Service. USPS.com. https://about.usps.com/who/profile/.
73.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2021b). Sizes for large envelopes and flats. USPS.com. https://pe.usps.com/businessmail101?ViewName=Flats.
74.
United States Postal Service (USPS) (2021c, February). First class mail volume since 1926. USPS.com. https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/postal-history/first-class-mail-since-1926.htm.
75.
WaldmanM. (2016). The fight to vote. Simon and Schuster.
76.
WhitneyJ. (2013). The 2010 citizens clean elections voter education guide: Constructing the “illegal immigrant” in the arizona voter. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 43(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.43.4.f
77.
WhittemoreS. (2015). Rhetorical memory. University of Chicago Press.
78.
WilliamsM. F. (2014). Introduction. In WilliamsM. F.PimentelO. (Eds.), Communicating race and ethnicity in technical communication (pp. 1–4). Baywood.
79.
WilliamsM. F.PimentelO. (2014). Communicating race, ethnicity, and identity in technical communication. Baywood.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
