This essay argues that technical rhetoric in ancient Athens is neither well nor fully understood in its present historical characterization but rather is best realized as occupying a position on a spectrum of literate skills ranging from an art to a craft. The dismissive views of technical writing advanced by Plato and Aristotle should be reconsidered and specialized literate practices be recognized as an important feature of rhetoric in Athens’ classical period. A review of discursive and material (archaeological) evidence reveals that technical writing was evolving into a craft-skill in Athens as early as the archaic period and, by the classical period, would be regarded as a respected “rhetorical” profession of artistic expression. This essay urges readers to reconsider the restrictive characterization of rhetoric advanced by some historians of rhetoric and include the specialist craft-skills of writing as a manifestation of technical rhetoric that both illustrates, and more accurately represents, the range of classical rhetoric in ancient Athens.
AdkinsL.AdkinsR. A. (1997). Handbook to life in ancient Greece. Oxford UP.
2.
Antiphon. On the Choreutes.
3.
Aristophanes. Peace.
4.
Aristotle. Ethica Nicomachea.
5.
Aristotle. Rhetoric.
6.
Aristotle. The athenian constitution.
7.
BérardC.BronC.DurandJ.-L.Frontisi-DucrouxF.LissarragueF.SchnappA.VernantJ.-P. (1989), A city of images: Iconography and society in ancient Greece. Trans. D. Lyons. Princeton UP.
8.
BitzerL. (1978). Rhetoric and public knowledge. In BurksD. M. (Ed.), Rhetoric, philosophy and literature: An exploration (pp. 67–93). Purdue UP.
9.
CookB. F. (1987). Greek Inscriptions. British Museum Publications.
10.
Diogenes Laeritus. Xenophon.
11.
DoddsE. R. (1973). The Greeks and the irrational. U of California P.
12.
EnosR. L. (2002). Inventional constraints on the technographers of ancient Athens: A study of kairos. In SipioraP.BaumlinJ. S. (Eds.), Rhetoric and kairos: Essays in history, theory, and praxis (pp. 77–88). State U of New York P.
13.
EnosR. L.RobinsonN. T.NoblesH. G. (2020). Rhetorical decipherment and the recovery of women in the history of ancient rhetoric: A note on the bronze age women of linear b scripts. Journal for the History of Rhetoric, 23(1), 84–102. http://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2019.1685416
14.
Epigraphical Museum (EM). Athens.
15.
Eunapius. Vitae sophistarum.
16.
GelbI. J. (1974). A study of writing (Revised ed.). The U of Chicago P.
17.
GrimaldiW.AristotleS. J. (1980). Rhetoric I: A commentary. Fordham UP.
18.
HavelockE. A. (1982). The preliteracy of the Greeks. In The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequences (pp. 185–207). Princeton UP.
19.
Inscriptiones Graecae (IG).
20.
KennedyG. A. (1980). Classical rhetoric & its Christian and secular tradition from ancient to modern times. U of North Carolina P.
21.
KennedyG. A. (1999). Classical rhetoric & its Christian and secular tradition from ancient to modern times (2nd ed.). U of North Carolina P.
22.
KmetzM.LivelyR.Broch-ColombiniC.BlackT. (2012). Disciplining technology: A selective annotated bibliography. In BorrowmanS. (Ed.), On the blunt edge: Technology in composition's history and pedagogy (pp. 115–151). Parlor Press.
23.
KnudsenR. A. (2014). Homeric speech and the origins of rhetoric. Johns Hopkins UP.
24.
LampK. S. (2013). A city of marble: The rhetoric of Augustan Rome. U of South Carolina P.
25.
LangM. (1960). The Athenian citizen. The American School of Classical Studies at Athens.
26.
Lysias. Against Nicomachus.
27.
MitchellW. J. T. (1986). Iconology: Image, text, ideology. U of Chicago P.
28.
OngW. J. (1982; 1993). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. Routledge.
29.
ParássoglouG. M. (1985). A roll upon his knees. Yale Classical Studies, 28, 273–275.
30.
Pausanias. Description of Greece.
31.
Plato. Protagoras.
32.
PrelliL. (ed.). (2006). Rhetorics of display. U of South Carolina P.
33.
RichardsI. A. (1965). The philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford UP.
34.
SelfL. B. (1979). Rhetoric and phronesis: The Aristotelian ideal. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 12(2), 130–145.www.jstor.org/stable/40237105
35.
SolmsenF. (1968). The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric. In StarkR. (Ed.), Rhetorika: Schriften zur aristotelischen und hellenistischen rhetorik (pp. 312–349). Georg Olm Verlagsbuchhandlung.
36.
SteinmannM. Jr. (ed., 1967). New rhetorics. Charles Scribner's Sons.
37.
The athenian agora. (1990). American School of Classical Studies at Athens (4th ed.). Institute of Advanced Study.
38.
The greek script: Catalogue of an exhibition of copies. (2003). Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sport.
39.
TwalE. C. (2020). New materialist orientations to comparative historiographical methods: Places of invention and public memory in situ. In LloydK. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of comparative world rhetorics: Studies in the history, application, and teaching of rhetoric beyond traditional Greco-Roman contexts (pp. 287–296). Routledge.
40.
VentrisM.ChadwickJ. (1959). Documents in Mycenaean Greek: Three hundred selected tablets from Knossos, Pylos and Mycenae with commentary and vocabulary. Cambridge UP.
41.
WalkerJ. (2000). Rhetoric and poetics in antiquity. Oxford UP.
42.
WycherleyR. E. (1957). Literary and epigraphical testimonia. In The Athenian agora: Results of the excavations conducted by The American School of Classical Studies at Athens (Vol. III). The American School of Classical Studies at Athens.
43.
YoungR. E. (1980). Arts, crafts, gifts, knacks: Some disharmonies in the new rhetoric. Visible Language, 14(4), 341–350.
