Technical and professional communication master’s students work with a faculty advisor to complete a three-credit independent research (IR) project, featuring original research. Stakeholders recommended the IR thesis be revised to better communicate IR to industry. Using a writing, activity theory, and genre theory lens, I analyzed what contradictions emerged between academic and workplace activity systems as stakeholders recommended genre revisions. I analyzed faculty and professional advisory board meeting transcripts, alumni and student surveys, and a Graduate School director and thesis examiner interview. Results indicated the thesis’ spectrum of functions, from its strengths encouraging students’ research proficiency to the limiting way it showcases IR as a product, not a process. Stakeholders suggested no thesis changes but recommended IR genre system modifications. As agents of change, students are uniquely positioned to use the IR genre system to address workplace communication problems and help mend our discipline’s academia-industry divide.
ArduserL. (2017). Remediating diagnosis: A familiar narrative form or emerging digital genre? In MillerC. R.KellyA. R. (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 63–78).
Palgrave MacMillan.
2.
ArtemevaN. (2008).
Toward a unified social theory of genre learning. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
22(2), 160–185.
3.
BaehrC. (2015).
Complexities of hybridization: Professional identities and relationships in technical communication. Technical Communication,
62(2), 104–117.
4.
BasgierC. (2017). Atypical rhetorical actions: Defying genre expectations on Amazon.com. In MillerC. R.KellyA. R. (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 187–202).
Palgrave MacMillan.
5.
BawarshiA. (2000).
The genre function. College English,
62(3), 335–360.
6.
BazermanC. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In FreidmanA.MedwayP. (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101).
Taylor & Francis.
7.
BazermanC. (1997). Performatives constituting value: The case of patents. In GunnarssonB.-L.LinellP.NordbergB. (Eds.), The construction of professional discourse (pp. 42–53).
Taylor & Francis.
8.
BlakesleeA. M. (2009).
The technical communication research landscape. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
23(2), 129–173.
9.
BoettgerR. K.FriessE. (2016).
Academics are from Mars, practitioners are from Venus: Analyzing content alignment within technical communication forums. Technical Communication,
63(4), 314–327.
10.
BrayN. (2018).
How do online news genres take up knowledge claims from a scientific research article on climate change?Written Communication,
36(1), 155–189.
11.
BrumbergerE.LauerC. (2015).
The evolution of technical communication: An analysis of industry job postings. Technical Communication,
62(4), 224–243.
12.
CarpenterS.MakhadmehN.ThorntonL.-J. (2015).
Mentorship on the doctoral level: An examination of communication faculty mentors’ traits and functions. Communication Education, 64(3), 366–384.
13.
ColeM. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
14.
CoppolaN. W.ElliotN. (2010). Assessment (3) of graduate programs in technical communication: A relational model. In HundlebyM. G.AllenJ. (Eds.), Assessment in technical and professional communication (pp. 171–186).
Routledge.
15.
DannelsD. P. (2003).
Teaching and learning design presentations in engineering: Contradictions between academic and workplace activity systems. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
17(2), 139–169.
16.
DaviesK. (1990). Women, time, and the weaving of the strands of everyday life. Avebury.
17.
DubinskyJ. M. (2015).
Products and processes: Transition from ‘product documentation to … integrated technical content’. Technical Communication,
62(2), 118–134.
18.
DunmireP. L. (2000).
Genre as temporally situated social action: A study of temporality and genre activity. Written Communication,
17(1), 93–138.
19.
EatonA. (2009).
Applying to graduate school in technical communication. Technical Communication,
56(2), 149–171.
20.
EatonA.RothmanL.SmithJ.WoodyR.WarrenC.MooreJ.StrosserB., & PinksR. (2008). Mentoring undergraduates in the research process: Perspectives from the mentor and mentees. In EbleM. F.GailletL. L. (Eds.), Stories of mentoring: Theory and praxis.
Parlor Press.
21.
EbleM. F.GailletL. L. (2008). Stories of mentoring: Theory and praxis. Parlor Press.
22.
EngeströmY. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theory approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
23.
GiamonnaB. (2004).
The future of technical communication: How innovation, technology and information management and other forces are shaping the future of the profession. Technical Communication,
51, 349–366.
24.
GollnerJ.AndersenR.GollnerK.WebsterT. (2015).
A study of the usefulness of deploying a questionnaire to identify cultural dynamics potentially affecting a content-management project. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,
53(3), 289–308.
25.
Grant-DavieK. (2005). An assignment too far: Reflecting critically on internships in an online master’s program. In Cargile CookK.Grant-DavieK. (Eds.), Online education: Global questions, local answers (pp. 219–227).
Routledge.
26.
GygiK.ZachryM. (2010).
Productive tensions and the regulatory work of genres in the development of an engineering communication workshop in a transnational corporation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
24(3), 358–381.
27.
HannahM. A.LamC. (2016).
Patterns of dissemination: Examining and documenting practitioner knowledge sharing practices on blogs. Technical Communication,
63(4), 328–345.
28.
HartH.ConklinJ. (2006).
Toward a meaningful model for technical communication. Technical Communication,
53(4), 395–415.
29.
HenzeB. R. (2006).
The research-experiential internship in professional communication. Technical Communication,
53(3), 339–347.
30.
KimballM. A. (2015).
Training and education: Technical communication managers speak out. Technical Communication,
62(2), 135–145.
31.
KlineJ.BarkerT. (2012).
Negotiating professional consciousness in technical communication: A community of practice approach. Technical Communication,
59(1), 32–48.
32.
KochonF. (2015). Strategies for dissertation writing success. In CalabreseR. L.SmithP. (Eds.), The faculty mentor’s wisdom: Conceptualizing, writing, and defending the dissertation (pp. 27–33).
Rowman & Littlefield Education.
33.
LanierC. R. (2009).
Analysis of the skills called for by technical communication employers in recruitment postings. Technical Communication,
56(1), 51–61.
34.
LechugaV. M. (2011).
Faculty-graduate student mentoring relationships: Mentors’ perceived roles and responsibilities. Higher Education,
62, 757–771.
35.
Locke CarterJ. (2013).
Texas Tech University’s online PhD in technical communication and rhetoric. Programmatic Perspectives,
5(2), 243–268.
36.
LuzónM. J. (2017).
Connecting genres and languages in online scholarly communication: An analysis of research group blogs. Written Communication,
34(4), 441–471.
37.
MehlenbacherA. R. (2019).
Registered reports: Genre evolution and the research article. Written Communication,
36(1), 38–67.
38.
MelonçonL. (2009).
Master’s programs in technical communication: A current overview. Technical Communication,
56(2), 137–148.
39.
MelonçonL.HenschelS. (2013).
Current state of U.S. undergraduate degree programs in technical and professional communication. Technical Communication,
60(1), 45–64.
40.
MilesK. S.BurnettR. E. (2008). The minutia of mentorships: Reflections about professional development. In EbleM. F.GailletL. L. (Eds.), Stories of mentoring: Theory and praxis.
Parlor Press.
41.
MillerC. R. (1984).
Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech,
70, 151–167.
42.
MillerC. R.ShepherdD. (2004). Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. In Into the Blogosphere. University of Minnesota. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/172804
43.
NugentJ.JoséL. (2015). Stakeholder theory and technical communication academic programs. In BridgefordT.St. AmantK. (Eds.), Academy-industry relationships and partnerships: Perspectives for technical communicators (pp. 11–30).
Baywood Publishing.
44.
PattonS. (2013, February 11). The dissertation can no longer be defended. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
45.
Pope-RuarkR. (2012).
Back to our roots: An invitation to strengthen disciplinary arguments via the scholarship of teaching and learning. Business Communication Quarterly,
75(4), 357–376.
46.
PophamS. L. (2005).
Forms as boundary genres in medicine, science, and business. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
19(3), 279–303.
47.
RaineyK. T.TurnerR. K.DaytonD. (2005).
Do curricula correspond to managerial expectations? Core competencies for technical communicators. Technical Communication,
52(3), 323–352.
48.
Research Guide, Graduate School. University of Wisconsin-Stout.
49.
RobinsonS.DracupK. (2008).
Innovative options for the doctoral dissertation in nursing. Nursing Outlook,
58, 174–178.
50.
RudeC. (2015a).
Building identity and community through research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication,
54(4), 366–380.
51.
RudeC. (2015b). Foreword: Considering partnerships and relationships in the field. In BridgefordT.St. AmantK. (Eds.), Academy-industry relationships and partnerships: Perspectives for technical communicators (pp. v–ix).
Baywood Publishing.
52.
RudeC. D. (2009).
Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
23(2), 174–215.
53.
RussellD. R. (1997).
Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication,
14(4), 504–554.
54.
RussellD. R. (2009). Uses of activity theory in written communication research. In EngestromY. (Ed.), Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed., pp. 40–52).
Cambridge University Press.
55.
RussellD. R.YañezA. (2003). Big picture people rarely become historians. Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. In BazermanC.RussellD. R. (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 331–362). WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity.
56.
SchryerC. F. (2000).
Walking a fine line: Writing negative letters in an insurance company. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
14(4), 445–497.
57.
SchryerC. R. (1994). The lab vs. the clinic: Sites of competing genres. In FreedmanA.MedwayP. (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 105–123).
Taylor & Francis.
58.
SchryerC. F.SpoelP. (2005).
Genre theory, health-care discourse, and professional identity formation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
19(30), 249–278.
59.
SpilkaR. (2000).
The issue of quality in professional documentation: How can academia make more of a difference?Technical Communication Quarterly,
9(2), 207–220.
60.
SpilkaR. (2009).
Practitioner research instruction: A neglected curricular area in technical communication undergraduate programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
23(2), 216–237.
61.
SpinuzziC. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. The MIT Press.
62.
SpinuzziC. (2010).
Secret sauce and snake oil: Writing monthly reports in a highly contingent environment. Written Communication,
27(4), 363–409.
63.
St. AmantK.MelonçonL. (2016).
Reflections on research: Examining practitioner perspectives on the state of research in technical communication. Technical Communication,
63(4), 346–364.
64.
SyzmanskiE. A. (2016).
Constructing relationships between science and practice in the written science communication of the Washington state wine industry. Written Communication,
33(2), 184–215.
65.
TachinoT. (2012).
Theorizing uptake and knowledge mobilization: A case for intermediary genre. Written Communication,
29(4), 455–476.
66.
TebeauxE. (1996). Nonacademic writing into the 21st century: Achieving and sustaining relevance in research and curricula. In DuinA. H.HansenC. J. (Eds.), Nonacademic writing: Social theory and technology (pp. 35–55). Routledge.
67.
ThomasR. A.WestR. E.RichP. (2016).
Benefits, challenges, and perceptions of the multiple article dissertation format in instructional technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,
32(2), 82–98.
68.
ThrushE. A.HooperL. (2006).
Industry and the academy: How team-teaching brings two worlds together. Technical Communication,
53(3), 308–316.
69.
TurnsJ.RameyJ. (2006).
Active and collaborative learning in the practice of research: Credit-based directed research groups. Technical Communication,
53(3), 296–307.
70.
WalvoordB. E. (2010). Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education (2nd ed.).
Jossey-Bass.
71.
WattsJ. (2020).
Fostering industry connections through workplace-situated graduate research. Technical Communication,
67(3), 80–102.
72.
WhitesideA. L. (2003).
The skills that technical communicators need: An investigation of technical communication graduates, managers, and curricula. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication,
33(4), 303–318.
73.
WilsonG.Dyke FordJ. (2003).
The big chill: Seven technical communicators talk ten years after their master’s program. Technical Communication,
50(2), 145–159.
74.
WinsorD. (2007). Using texts to manage continuity and change in an activity system. In ZachryM.ThrallsC. (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp. 3–19).
Baywood.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
