In increasingly online higher education environments, instructors must develop positive and community-oriented learning environments, equivalent to, if different from, face-to-face learning experiences. Connectivism and communities of inquiry are complementary theories that facilitate the design and development of online learning and enable online learners to connect with peers. This article discusses two pedagogical interventions that encourage connectivism and foster communities of inquiry in online technical communication programs: (a) a face-to-face orientation workshop at the beginning of an online program and (b) a peer-review activity in a research methods graduate course. The article explains the development, deployment, and evaluation of the activities.
ArbaughJ. B.Cleveland-InnesM.DiazS. R.GarrisonD. R.IceP.RichardsonJ. C.SwanK. P. (2008).
Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education,
11(3–4), 133–136.
2.
BawaP. (2016).
Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—A literature review. SAGE Open,
6(1), 1–11.
3.
BellF. (2011).
Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,
12(3), 98–118.
4.
BotonE. C.GregoryS. (2015).
Minimizing attrition in online degree courses. Journal of Educators Online,
12(1), 62–90.
5.
BoudD.CohenR.SampsonJ. (2001). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other.
Kogan Page.
6.
ClearyY.SlatteryD. M.Marcus-QuinnA. (2018).
Parallel online, on-campus, and blended programme delivery: Challenges and strategies. International Journal on E-Learning,
17(4), 551–568.
7.
Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC). (2013, March). A position statement of principles and example effective practices for online writing instruction (OWI). https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/owiprinciples
8.
CroxtonR. A. (2014).
The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,
10(2), 314–324.
9.
DixsonM. D. (2010).
Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging?Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,
10(2), 1–13.
10.
DownesS. (2008).
Places to go: Connectivism and connective knowledge. Innovate: Journal of Online Education,
5(1), 1–6.
11.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT.ArcherW. (2000).
Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education,
2(2), 87–105.
12.
GarrisonD. R.AkyolZ. (2015).
Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education,
24, 66–71.
13.
GarrisonD. R.Cleveland-InnesM. (2005).
Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education,
19(3), 133–148.
14.
GazzaE. A.HunkerD. F. (2014).
Facilitating student retention in online graduate nursing education programs: A review of the literature. Nurse Education Today,
34(7), 1125–1129.
15.
GielenS.PeetersE.DochyF.OnghenaP.StruyvenK. (2010).
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction,
20(4), 304–315.
16.
GoldieJ. G. S. (2016).
Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age?Medical Teacher,
38(10), 1064–1069.
HewK. F. (2016).
Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology,
47(2), 320–341.
19.
HewettB. L.BourelleT. (2017).
Online teaching and learning in technical communication: Continuing the conversation. Technical Communication Quarterly,
26(3), 217–222.
20.
HilliardL. P.StewartM. K. (2019).
Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. The Internet and Higher Education,
41, 11–24.
21.
KemberD.LaiT.MurphyD.SiawI.YuenK. S. (1992).
Student progress in distance education: Identification of explanatory constructs. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
62(3), 285–298.
22.
KemberD.LaiT.MurphyD.SiawI.YuenK. S. (1994).
Student progress in distance education courses: A replication study. Adult Education Quarterly,
45(1), 286–301.
23.
KovanovićV.GaševićD.JoksimovićS.HatalaM.AdesopeO. (2015).
Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education,
27, 74–89.
LiL.GrionV. (2019).
The power of giving feedback and receiving feedback in peer assessment. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,
11(2), 1–17.
MelonçonL. (2007).
Exploring electronic landscapes: Technical communication, online learning, and instructor preparedness. Technical Communication Quarterly,
16(1), 31–53.
28.
MelonçonL. (2017).
Contingent faculty, online writing instruction, and professional development in technical and professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly,
26(3), 256–272.
29.
MosesJ.DuinA. H. (2015).
Intercultural connectivism and personal learning networks in course redesign. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization,
8(1), 22–39.
30.
NicolD. J.SerbatiA.TracchiM. (2019).
Competence development and portfolios: Promoting reflection through peer review. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,
11(2), 1–13.
31.
RavenscroftA. (2011).
Dialogue and connectivism: A new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,
12(3), 139–160.
32.
RovaiA. P. (2003).
In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. Internet and Higher Education,
6(1), 1–16.
SiemensG.ConoleG. (2011).
Special issue—Connectivism: Design and delivery of social networked learning: Editorial. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,
12(3), i–iv.
36.
SlatteryD. M.ClearyY. (2016). E-learning and technical communication for international audiences. In St.AmantK.FlammiaM. (Eds.), Teaching and training for global engineering: Perspectives on culture and professional communication practices (pp. 149–172).
Wiley/IEEE Press.
37.
StenbomS. (2018).
A systematic review of the Community of Inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education,
39, 22–32.
38.
WattsJ. (2017).
Beyond flexibility and convenience: Using the Community of Inquiry framework to assess the value of online graduate education in technical and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
31(4), 481–519.
39.
WengerE.WhiteN.SmithJ. D. (2009). Digital Habitats: Stewarding Technology for Communities.
CPsquare.
