Very few articles exist that document technical communication in Hungary. My Fulbright research reveals two general points: First, technical communication pedagogy stresses correct use of professional terms and phrases in technical translations or technical articles for fictional audiences. Second, it does not emphasize the importance of specifying target audiences in students’ work; similarly, Hungarian companies, perhaps driven by oral culture in communication, do not target at any specific audiences in written communication. In this respect, education and practice seems to shape each other. More research is needed to provide more elements to help us understand technical communication in Hungary.
AndersonP. V. (2013) Technical communication: A reader-centered approach, 8th ed. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
2.
AngS.InpkenA. C. (2008) Cultural intelligence and offshore outsourcing success: A framework of firm-level intercultural capability. Decision Science39(3): 337–358.
3.
BakacsiG.SandorT.AndrasK.ViktorI. (2002) Eastern European cluster: Tradition and transition. Journal of World Business37: 59–80.
4.
BatovaT. (2010) Writing for the participants of international clinical trials: Law, ethics, and culture. Technical Communication57(3): 266–281.
5.
BowenB.SappD. A.SargsyanN. (2006) Resume writing in Russia and the newly independent states. Business Communication Quarterly69(1): 128–134.
6.
BradyA. (2007) What teach and what they use: Teaching and learning in scientific and technical communication programs and beyond. Journal of Business and Technical Communication21(1): 37–61.
7.
British Council (1987) English teaching profile: Hungary, London, England: Author.
8.
BudaA. (2009) Country case study: Hungary. In: VlaardingerbroekB.TaylorN. (eds) Second school external examination systems, Amherst, NY: Cambria Press, pp. 113–123.
9.
CerychL. (1997) Education reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: Process and outcomes. European Journal of Education32(1): 75–96.
10.
CoxM.Ortmeier-HooperC.TirabassiK. (2009) Teaching writing for the “real world”: Community and workplace writing. The English Journal98: 72–80.
11.
DanielsJ. K.CronjeR. J.SokolowskiB. C. (1998) Exchange medical information with Eastern Europe through the internet. Technical Communication Quarterly7(3): 301–317.
12.
DingD. (2010) When traditional Chinese culture meets a technical communication program in a Chinese university: Report on teaching technical communication in China. Technical Communication58: 34–51.
13.
DingD.JablonskiJ. (2001) Challenges and opportunities: Two weeks of teaching technical communication at Suzhou University, China. Technical Communication48: 421–434.
14.
DobrinD. N. (1982) What’s difficult about teaching technical writing. College English44: 135–140.
15.
DornyelZ.CsizerK.NemethN. (2006) Motivation, language attitudes, and globalization: A Hungarian perspective, Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
16.
DuffP. A. (1995) An ethnography of communication in immersion classroom in Hungary. TESOL Quarterly29: 505–537.
17.
Ford (2013) Ford job-fair booklet, Szentendre, Hungary: Ford.
18.
Fruchter, R., & Lewis, S. (2001). Mentoring models in an A/E/C global teamwork e-learning environment. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 24–27, Albuquerque, NM.
19.
GerrigR. J.PrenticeD. A. (1991) The representation of fictional information. Psychological Science2: 336–340.
20.
GlesneC.PeshkinA. (1992) Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction, New York, NY: Longman.
21.
GopnikA. (2014) Word magic. The New Yorker90: 36–39.
22.
GuptaV.HangesP. J.DorfmanP. (2002) Cultural clusters: Methodology and findings. Journal of World Business37(1): 11–15.
23.
HagenP. (1998) Teaching American business writing in Russia: Cross-cultures/cross-purposes. Journal of Business and Technical Communication12(1): 109–126.
24.
HarootunianG. (2007) Dancing the Kochari: Challenging the US perspective on communication in newly democratic states. Journal of Business and Technical Communication21(1): 91–105.
25.
Humpden-TurnerC.TrompenaaraF. (2000) Building across cultural competence: How to create wealth from conflicting values, London, England: Yale University Press.
KoltayT. (1999) Writing globally: Teaching technical writing to Hungarian students of translation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication13: 86–93.
28.
Kosoluszy, E. O. (2005). What do we teach to our students? Paper presented at University of Debrecen Colloquium.
29.
KreugerR. A. (1988) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, London, England: Sage.
30.
LannonJ. M.GurakL. J. (2016) Technical communication, 14th ed. New York, NY: Pearson/Longman.
MikelonisV. M. (2000) Message sent versus message received: Implications for designing and training materials for Central and Eastern Europeans. In: HagerP. J.ScheiberH. J. (eds) Managing global communication in science and technology, New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, pp. 205–231.
35.
OliuW. E.BruawC. T.AlredG. T. (2013) Writing that works: Communicating effectively on the job, 11th ed. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
36.
Orwell, G. (1946). Politics and English language. Collection of essays by George Orwell (pp. 156–171). London, England: Horizon.
37.
ParettiM. C.McNairL. D.Holloway-AttawayL. (2007) Teaching technical communication in an era of distributed work: A case study of collaboration between US and Swedish students. Technical Communication Quarterly16(3): 327–352.
38.
PearsonS. (1983) Challenge of Ming Chung: Teaching technical writing to the foreign-born professional in industry. TESOL Quarterly17: 383–399.
39.
PinelliT. E.BarclayR. O.KenneM. L.FlammiaM.KennedyJ. M. (1993) The technical communication practices of Russia and U.S. aerospace engineers and scientists. IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication36(2): 95–104.
40.
RobertsE.TulejaE. A. (2008) When west meets east: Teaching a managerial communication course in Hong Kong. Journal of Business and Technical Communication22(4): 474–489.
41.
RoskinM. G. (1991) The rebirth of east Europe, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42.
SchwartzS. H.BardiA. (1997) Influence of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology18(2): 385–410.
43.
SmithB. P.DuganS.TrompenaarsF. (1996) National culture and the values of organizational employees. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology3: 231–263.
44.
SmithB. P. (1997) Leadership in Europe: Euro-management or the footprint of history?European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology6(4): 375–386.
45.
StevenB. (2000) Russian teaching contracts: An examination of cultural influence and genre. Journal of Business and Technical Communication14(1): 38–57.
46.
StewartD.ShamdasaniP. N. (1990) Focus groups: Theory and practice, London, England: Sage.
47.
TarashevaE. (2011) The place of Eastern European researchers in international discourse: Critical discourse analysis applied to corpora from specialized journals. Discourse and Society22(2): 190–208.
48.
TebeauxE. T.DraggaS. (2015) The essentials of technical communication, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49.
UlijinJ. M.StrotherJ. B. (1995) Communication in business and technology: From psycholinguistic theory to international practice, Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
50.
ZemlianskyP.St. AmantK. (2013) The state of technical communication in the former USSR: A review of literature. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication43(3): 237–260.
