The notion of the author's intention is logically tied to the interpretation we give to her work, as the notion of the agent's intention is logically tied to the interpretation we give to her action. When we find a discrepancy between what the author or agent says and the meaning we find in her work or the sense we make of what she does, this does not show that the intention is irrelevant in determining this meaning or sense. As Frank Cioffi has argued, we are rather favouring one criterion of intention over another. Taking a close look at the early criticism surrounding The Turn of the Screw I draw attention to this phenomenon — much discussed by Wittgenstein — of favouring one criterion of intention over another. Because Wittgenstein's views, though mentioned frequently, are still ill-understood, I go on to tease out the philosophical assumptions that lurk in the background of disputes about the relevance of intention for interpretation.
Beardsley, A. (1958) Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism . New York: Harcourt, Brace.
3.
Cioffi, Frank (1963) `Intention and Interpretation in Criticism', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 64: 85-106. Reprinted in D. Newton-De Molina (ed.), On Literary Intention, pp. 55-73. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1976.
4.
Dasenbrock, R. W. (ed.) (1993) Literary Theory after Davidson. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
5.
Davidson, D. (1980) Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6.
Davidson, D. (1984) Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
Eco, U. (1992) Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Elton, Oliver (1907) `The Novels of Mr Henry James', in Modern Studies, pp. 255-6. London: Edward Arnold . Reprinted in Esch and Warren (1999: 157).
9.
Esch, D. and Warren, J. (eds) (1999) The Turn of the Screw: Authoritative Text, Contexts, Criticism, second edn. New York: Norton.
10.
Foucault, M. (1988) `The Masked Philosopher', trans. Alan Sheridan , in L. Kritzman (ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture. Interviews and Other Writings, 1977-1984. New York: Routledge.
11.
Goddard, H. (1957) `A Pre-Freudian Reading of The Turn of the Screw' , Nineteenth Century Fiction, 12(1). Reprinted in Kimbrough (1966: 181-209) and excerpted in Esch and Warren (1999: 161-8).
12.
Heil, J. and Mele, A. (eds) (1993) Mental Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13.
The Independent (1899) 5 January, p. 73. Reprinted in Esch and Warren (1999: 156).
14.
Iseminger (ed.) (1991) Intention and Interpretation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
15.
James, H. (1908) Preface to The Aspern Papers; The Turn of the Screw; The Liar; The Two Faces, in The Novels and Tales of Henry James (New York Edition), vol. 12, pp. xiv-xxii. New York: Norton. Reprinted in Esch and Warren (1999: 123-9).
16.
Kenton, E. (1924) `Henry James to the Ruminant Reader: The Turn of the Screw', The Arts, 6 (November). Reprinted in Esch and Warren (1999: 169-70).
17.
Kimbrough, R. (ed.) (1966) The Turn of the Screw: An Authoritative Text, Backgrounds and Sources. New York: Norton.
18.
Lamarque Peter (2002) `Appreciation and Literary Interpretation', in Michael Krausz (ed.), Is There a Single Right Interpretation?University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
19.
Livingston, Paisley (2005) Art and Intention - A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Mele, A. (1992) Springs of Action - Understanding Intentional Behavior . New York: Oxford University Press .
21.
The Outlook (1898) 60, 28 October, p. 537. Reprinted in Esch and Warren (1999 : 151).
22.
Radford, G. (2002) `Beware of the Fallout: Umberto Eco and the Making of the Model Reader'. Available at: www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_papers_radford.html (accessed 15 May 2008).
23.
Ryle, G. (2000[1949]) The Concept of Mind. London: Penguin Classics.
24.
Slaughter, M. (1966) `Edmund Wilson and "The Turn of the Screw"', in R. Kimbrough (ed.), The Turn of the Screw: An Authoritative Text, Backgrounds and Sources. New York: Norton.
25.
Tanney, J. (1995) `Why Reasons May Not Be Causes', Mind and Language, 10(1/2): 103-26.
26.
Tanney, J. (2002) `Self-Knowledge, Normativity, and Construction' , in Logic, Thought and Language (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 51), pp. 37-55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Tanney, J. (2005a) Reason-Explanation and the Contents of the Mind' , Ratio, 18(3): 338-51.
28.
Tanney, J. (2005b) `Une cartographie des concepts mentaux'. Critical introduction to Gilbert Ryle, La Notion d'Esprit, pp. 7-70. Paris : Payot.
29.
Tanney, J. (2007) `Gilbert Ryle', in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ryle (accessed 15 May 2008).
30.
Tanney, J. (2008) `Reasons as Non-Causal, Context-Placing Explanations' , in Constantine Sandis (ed.), New Essays on the Explanation of Action. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
Wilson, E. (1938) The Triple Thinkers. New York : Harcourt. Reprinted and expanded New York: Oxford University Press, 1948.
32.
Wilson, E. (1934) `The Ambiguity of Henry James', Hound and Horn, 7, reprinted in Wilson (1938 and 1948).
33.
Wilson, E. (1960) A Casebook on Henry James's `The Turn of the Screw' . New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co .
34.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe . Oxford: Blackwell.
35.
Wittgenstein, L. (1979) Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge, 1932-1935, ed. A. Ambrose.Oxford: Blackwell.
36.
Wolff, R.L. (1941) `The Genesis of The Turn of the Screw', American Literature, 13(1): 1-8. Reprinted in Kimbrough (1966) and Esch and Warren (1999 : 133-4).
