This article is a dialogue with the theoretical arguments of Alfred Gell's book Art and Agency. While strongly supporting an action-oriented perspective on art it is argued that Gell's argument deflects attention away from human agency by attributing agency to the objects themselves. It is argued that the very properties of art that Gell excludes from his definition of art objects and largely from his analyses — aesthetics and semantics — are integral to understanding art as a way of acting in the world and to understanding the impact that art works have on people.
Arnaut, K. (2001) `A Pragmatic Impulse in the Anthropology of Art? Alfred Gell and the Semiotics of Social Objects', Journal des Africanistes71(2): 191-208.
2.
Bowden, R. (2004) `A Critique of Alfred Gell on Art and Agency', Oceania74(4): 309-24.
3.
Boyer, P. (1994) The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Campbell, S. (2002) The Art of Kula. London: Berg.
5.
Errington, S. (1998) The Death of Authentic Primitive Art and Tales of Progress. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Fischer, J.L. (1961) `Art Styles as Cultural Cognitive Maps', American Anthropologist63(1): 79-93.
7.
Gell, A. (1992) `The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology', in J. Coote and A. Shelton (eds) Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics, pp. 40-67. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
8.
Gell, A. (1993) Wrapping in Images: Tattooing in Polynesia. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
9.
Gell, A. (1996) `Vogel's Net: Traps as Artworks: Artworks as Traps' , Journal of Material Culture1(1): 15-38.
10.
Gell, A. (1998) Art and Agency. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
11.
Guss, D. (1989) To Weave and Sing: Art, Symbol and Narrative in the South American Rainforest. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Hanson, A. (1983) `When the Map is the Territory: Art in Maori Culture' , in D.K. Washburn (ed.) Structure and Cognition in Art, pp. 74-89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Hoskins, J. (2006) `Agency, Biography and Objects', in Christopher Tilley, Webb Keane, Susanne Küchler, and Mike Rowlands (eds) Handbook of Material Culture , pp. 74-84. London: SAGE.
14.
Ingold T., ed. (1996) Key Debates in Anthropology (Debate: `Aesthetics is a Cross-Cultural Category', presentations for the motion by J. Coote and H. Morphy). London: Routledge.
15.
Johnson, M.H. (2006) `On the Nature of Theoretical Archaeology and Archaeological Theory', Archaeological Dialogues13(2): 117-32.
16.
Layton, R. (2003) `Art and Agency: A Reassessment', The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute9(3): 447-64.
17.
Lipset, D. (2005) `Dead Canoes: The Fate of Agency in Twentieth-Century Murik Art', Social Analysis49(1): 109-40.
18.
Morphy, H. (1991) Ancestral Connections: Art and an Aboriginal System of Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Morphy, H. (1992) `From Dull to Brilliant: The Aesthetics of Spiritual Power among the Yolngu', in J. Coote and A. Shelton (eds) Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics, pp. 181-208. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Morphy, H. and Perkins, M. (2006) The Anthropology of Art: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
O'Hanlon, M. (1995) `Modernity and Graphicalization of Meaning: New Guinea Highland Shield Design in Historical Perspective', Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute1(September): 469-92.
23.
Price, S. (1989) Primitive Art in Civilised Places. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Thomas, N. and Pinney, C. , eds (2001) Beyond Aesthetics: Art and the Technologies of Enchantment. Oxford: Berg.
25.
Winter, I. (2007) `Agency Marked, Agency Ascribed: The Affective Object in Ancient Mesopotamia', in Robin Osborne and Jeremy Tanner (eds) Art's Agency and Art History, pp. 42-69. Oxford: Blackwell.
