Teacher preparation programs play an important role in preparing future special education teachers in the implementation of evidence-based interventions for students with disabilities. The purpose of this study was to examine the social validity and effects of two training strategies––video performance feedback and self-monitoring—on systematic instruction implementation of 51 pre-service special education teachers enrolled in a cross-categorical program. Systematic instruction implementation focused on two common response prompting systems––constant time delay and system of least prompts––across discrete and chained skills. Our findings indicate that, overall, both training strategies were effective in improving pre-service teachers’ systematic instruction implementation. Across both training strategies and response prompting systems, there were significant gains in implementation when used to teach chained skills. Additionally, pre-service teachers found both training strategies effective and feasible. We present implications for teacher preparation and future research directions.
Ahlgrim-DelzellL.BrowderD. M.WoodL.StangerC.PrestonA. I.Kemp-InmanA. (2016). Systematic instruction of phonics skills using an iPad for students with developmental disabilities who are AAC users. The Journal of Special Education, 50(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466915622140
2.
AlexanderM.WilliamsN. A.NelsonK. L. (2012). When you can't get there: Using video self-monitoring as a tool for changing the behaviors of pre-service teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(4), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051203100404
3.
BrockM. E.AndersonE. J. (2021). Training paraprofessionals who work with students with intellectual and developmental disabilities: What does the research say?Psychology in the Schools, 58(4), 702–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22386
4.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2017). A meta-analysis of educator training to improve implementation of interventions for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(3), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516653477
5.
BrowderD. M.RootJ. R.WoodL.AllisonC. (2017). Effects of a story-mapping procedure using the iPad on the comprehension of narrative texts by students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(4), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615611387
6.
BrowderD. M.WoodL.ThompsonJ.RibuffoC. (2014). Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities (Document No. IC-3). m University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/
7.
BrownF. E.McDonnellJ.SnellM. E. (2020). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (9th ed.). Pearson.
8.
BurnsR. W.JacobsJ.Yendol-HoppeyD. (2020). A framework for naming the scope and nature of teacher candidate supervision in clinically-based teacher preparation: Tasks, high-leverage practices, and pedagogical routines of practice. The Teacher Educator, 55(2), 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2019.1682091
9.
CollinsB. C. (2022). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
10.
CorneliusK. E.NagroS. A. (2014). Evaluating the evidence base of performance feedback in preservice special education teacher training. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414521837
11.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What every special educator must know: Professional ethics and standards. Council for Exceptional Children.
12.
Creech-GallowayC.CollinsB. C.KnightV.BauschM. (2013). Using a simultaneous prompting procedure with an iPad to teach the Pythagorean Theorem to adolescents with moderate intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(4), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691303800402
13.
Darling-HammondL.HylerM. E.GardnerM. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
14.
DogoeM.BandaD. R. (2009). Review of recent research using constant time delay to teach chained tasks to persons with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44(2), 177–186.
FallonL. M.Collier-MeekM. A.MagginD. M.SanettiL. M.JohnsonA. H. (2015). Is performance feedback for educators an evidence-based practice? A systematic review and evaluation based on single-case research. Exceptional Children, 81(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551738
17.
GarlandK. V.VasquezE.IIIPearlC. (2012). Efficacy of individualized clinical coaching in a virtual reality classroom for increasing teachers’ fidelity of implementation of discrete trial teaching. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(4), 502–515.
18.
GreenwayR.McCollowM.HudsonR. F.PeckC.DavisC. A. (2013). Autonomy and accountability: Teacher perspectives on evidence-based practice and decision-making for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(4), 456–468.
19.
HeinrichS.CollinsB. C.KnightV.SpriggsA. D. (2016). Embedded simultaneous prompting procedure to teach STEM content to high school students with moderate disabilities in an inclusive setting. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(1), 41–54.
20.
KalisT. M.VannestK. J.ParkerR. (2007). Praise counts: Using self-monitoring to increase effective teaching practices. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 51(3), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.51.3.20-27
21.
KretlowA. G.BartholomewC. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(4), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406410371643
22.
LekoM. M.BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T. (2015). Envisioning the future of special education personnel preparation in a standards-based era. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598782
McLeodR. H. (2020). Supporting preservice teachers to implement systematic instruction through video review, reflection, and performance feedback. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(3), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-01001-y
25.
MorseT. E.SchusterJ. W. (2004). Simultaneous prompting: A review of the literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(2), 153–168.
26.
MouzakitisA.CoddingR. S.TryonG. (2015). The effects of self-monitoring and performance feedback on the treatment integrity of behavior intervention plan implementation and generalization. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(4), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715573629
27.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2001).
28.
NoellG. H.GansleK. A.MeversJ. L.KnoxR. M.MintzJ. C.DahirA. (2014). Improving treatment plan implementation in schools: A meta-analysis of single subject design studies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(1), 168–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-013-9177-1
29.
OliverR. M.WehbyJ. H.NelsonJ. R. (2015). Helping teachers maintain classroom management practices using a self-monitoring checklist. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.007
30.
O’ReillyM. F.RenzagliaA.HutchinsM.Koterba-BussL.ClaytonM.HalleJ. W.IzenC. (1992). Teaching systematic instruction competencies to special education student teachers: An applied behavioral supervision model. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped,17(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699201700205
31.
O’ReillyM. F.RenzagliaA.LeeS. (1994). An analysis of acquisition, generalization and maintenance of systematic instruction competencies by preservice teachers using behavioral supervision techniques. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,29(1), 22–33.
32.
RispoliM.ZainiS.MasonR.BrodheadM.BurkeM. D.GregoriE. (2017). A systematic review of teacher self-monitoring on implementation of behavioral practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.007
33.
RupparA. L.RobertsC. A.OlsonA. J. (2018). Developing expertise in teaching students with extensive support needs: A roadmap. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(6), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-56.6.412
34.
SaundersA. F.WakemanS.ReyesE.ThurlowM. L.VandercookT. (2020). Instructional practices for students with the most significant disabilities in inclusive settings: A review of the literature (TIES Center Report 104). University of Minnesota, The TIES Center.
35.
SawyerM. R.AndzikN. R.KranakM. P.WillkeC. P.CurielE. S.HansleyL. E.NeefN. A. (2017). Improving pre-service teachers’ performance through behavioral skills training. Behavior Analysis in Practice,10(3), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0198-4
36.
SchlesR. A.RobertsonR. E. (2017). The role of performance feedback and implementation of evidence-based practices for preservice special education teachers and student outcomes: A review of the literature. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417736571
37.
SladeM. L.BurnhamS. M. C.WatersT. (2019). The impact of reflective practice on teacher candidates’ learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,13(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130215
38.
SpoonerF.McKissickB. R.KnightV. F. (2017). Establishing the state of affairs for evidence-based practices in students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916684896
39.
SpoonerF.RootJ. R.SaundersA. F.BrowderD. M. (2019). An updated evidence-based practice review on teaching mathematics to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751055
40.
WalkerG. (2008). Constant and progressive time delay procedures for teaching children with autism: A literature review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0390-4
41.
WestlingD. L.CarterE. W.Da FonteA.KurthJ. A. (2023). Teaching students with severe disabilities (6th ed.). Pearson.
42.
XiaoB.TobinJ. (2018). The use of video as a tool for reflection with preservice teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education,39(4), 328–345. htttps://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2018.1516705
43.
YoonK. S.DuncanT.LeeS. W.-Y.ScarlossB.ShapleyK. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 033). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
