This article argues that the stifling of innovation in teacher education has threatened the vitality of the field. Departing from the typical debate over the merits of the traditional versus the alternative route, this article encourages a pluralistic approach to teacher preparation that the author believes holds promise for revitalizing the field of teacher education. It highlights an innovative approach to teacher education taken by nonuniversity providers that may serve as models for future teacher education reform efforts and concludes with a challenging agenda for policy makers to create an environment in which multiple providers of teacher education are given the opportunity to innovate with new models for improving teacher education.
Allen, M. ( 2003). Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say?Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
2.
Angus, D.L. ( 2001). Professionalism and the public good: A brief history of teacher certification. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
3.
Apple, M. ( 2001). Markets, standards, teaching and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 182-196.
4.
Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. ( 1998). The case against teacher certification. Public Interest, 132, 17-29.
5.
Berry, B., Montgomery, D., Curtis, R., Hernandez, M., Wurtzel, J., & Snyder, J. ( 2008). Creating and sustaining urban teacher residencies: A new way to recruit, prepare and retain effective teachers. Chapel Hill, NC: Aspen Institute and Center for Teaching Quality.
6.
Berry, B., Montgomery, D., & Snyder, J. ( 2008). Urban teacher residency models and institutes of higher education: Implications for teacher preparation. Chapel Hill, NC: National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education and Center for Teaching Quality.
7.
Bestor, A.E. ( 1953). Educational wastelands: The retreat from learning in our public schools. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
8.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1993). Sociology in question. London: Sage.
9.
Boyd, D., Grossman, P.L., Hammerness, K., Lankford, R.H., Loeb, S., McDonald, M., et al. (2008). Surveying the landscape of teacher education in New York City: Constrained variation and the challenge of innovation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 319-343.
10.
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. ( 2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy , 1, 176-216.
11.
Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Rockoff, J.E., & Wyckoff, J.H. ( 2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools (NBER working paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
12.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, M.K. ( 2001). Sticks, stones, and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 3-15.
13.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K.M. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Coley, S.M. ( 1958). Controversy in teacher education: The central issue. Teachers College Record, 59, 433-440.
15.
Conant, J.B. ( 1963). The education of American teachers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Council of the Great City Schools. (2000). The urban teacher challenge: Teacher demand and supply in the great city schools . Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers /Urban Teacher Collaborative.
17.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Berry, B. ( 2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 57-77.
18.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. ( 2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. ( 1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
20.
Feistritzer, C.E. ( 2005a). Profile of alternate route teachers. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information .
21.
Feistritzer, C.E. ( 2005b, September). State policy trends for alternative routes to teacher certification: A moving target. Paper presented at the Conference on Alternative Certification: A Forum for Highlighting Rigorous Research, Washington, DC.
Fraser, J.W. ( 2005). Notes toward a new progressive politics of teacher education . Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 279-284.
24.
Gatlin, D. ( 2007). Thinking outside the university: Innovation in alternative certification. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
25.
Goldhaber, D.D., & Brewer, D.J. ( 2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129-145.
26.
Gordon, R., Kane, T.J., & Staiger, D. ( 2006). Identifying effective teachers using performance on the job. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
27.
Grossman, P. ( 2008). Responding to our critics: From crisis to opportunity in research on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education , 59, 10-23.
28.
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., O’Brien, D.M., & Rivkin, S.G. ( 2005). The market for teacher quality (NBER working paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research .
29.
Hassel, B.C., & Sherburne, M.E. (2004). Cultivating success through multiple providers. In F. M. Hess, A. Rotherham, & K. Walsh (Eds.), A qualified teacher in every classroom? Appraising old answers and new ideas (pp. 201-222). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
30.
Heinen, E.B., & Scribner, J.P. (2007) Bureaucratic discretion and alternative teacher certification: Understanding program variation in Missouri. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 15(13). Retrieved June 22, 2009, from http://epaa.asu.edu/v15n13/
31.
Hess, F.M. ( 2005). The predictable, but unpredictably personal, politics of teacher licensure. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 192-198.
32.
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow’s teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI : Author.
33.
Kanstoroom, M., & Finn, C. E. (1999). Better teachers, better schools. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
34.
Klagholz, L. (2000). Growing better teachers in the garden state. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
35.
Koerner, J.D. ( 1963). The miseducation of American teachers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
36.
Labaree, D.F. ( 2008). An uneasy relationship: The history of teacher education in the university. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & J. D. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 290-306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Marks, H.M., & Louis, K.S. ( 1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 245-275.
38.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. ( 1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
39.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York: Author.
40.
National Council on Teacher Quality. (2007 ). 2007 state teacher policy yearbook. Washington, DC: Author.
41.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417-458. Rochester, J. M. (2002). Class warfare: Besieged schools, bewildered parents, betrayed kids and the attack on excellence. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
42.
Sanders, W., & Rivers, J. ( 1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teacher on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
43.
Stotko, E.M., Ingram, R., & Beaty-O’Ferrall, M.E. (2007). Promising strategies for attracting and retaining successful urban teachers. Urban Education, 42, 30-51.
44.
Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986 ). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. Hyattsville, MD: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
45.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). The secretary’s fifth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom. Washington, DC: Office of Postsecondary Education.
46.
Villar, A., & Strong, M. ( 2007). Is mentoring worth the money? A benefit-cost analysis and five year rate of return of a comprehensive mentoring program of beginning teachers. ERS Spectrum, 25(3), 1-17.
47.
Walsh, K., & Jacobs, S. ( 2007). Alternative certification isn’t alternative. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute and National Council on Teacher Quality.
48.
Wilson, S.M., Floden, R.E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider’s view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 190-204.
49.
Wilson, S.M., & Tamir, E. ( 2008). The evolving field of teacher education: How understanding challenge(r)s might improve the preparation of teachers. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman -Nemser, & J. D. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 908-936). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
Zeichner, K. ( 2006). Reflections of a university-based teacher educator on the future of college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 326-340.
