In this paper, an empirical comparison of three state-of-the-art classifier methods (artificial immune recognition systems, Lazy-K Star, and random tree) to predict teachers’ ability to adapt in a classroom environment is carried out. Two educational databases are used for this task. First, measures collected in an academic context, especially from classroom visits, are used (database 1). Then, the three classifiers quantify the acts, behaviors, and characteristics of teaching effectiveness and the teacher’s “ability to adapt in the classrooms.” Professional classrooms visits to more than 200 teachers are used as the second database (database 2). An interactive grid gathering 63 educational acts and behaviors is conceived as an observation instrument for those visits. Within the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis library environment, and with the progressive enhancement of the raw database, the utilization of state-of-the-art classification methods when predicting teaching effectiveness shows promising results, especially when data quality issues are considered.
Darling-HammondL.DucommunC. E. (2010). Recognizing and Developing Effective Teaching: What Policymakers Should Know and Do Policy. Washington, DC: American Association of College for Teacher Education and National Education Association. http://aacte.org/pdf/State_Chapters/State Resources/Policy_Papers/Policy Paper - Effective Teaching.pdf (Accessed 01 November 2021)
5.
GoodmanD. E.BoggessL.WatkinsA. (2003). An investigation into the source of power for AIRS, an artificial immune classification system. In Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN 2003), Portland, Oregon, pp. 1678–1683.
6.
Greene, J. C., Millett, R. A., & Hopson, R. (2004). Evaluation as a Democratizing Practice. In M. T. Braverman, N. A. Constantine, & J. K. Slater (Eds.), Foundations and Evaluation: Contexts and Practices for Effective Philanthropy. (pp. 96–118). Jossey-Bass.
7.
HuczynskiA. A., & BuchananD. A.. (2007). Organizational Behaviour: An Introductory Text. 6th Edition, Prentice Hall: Pearson Education, UK.
8.
KingtonA.SammonsP.DayC.ReganE. (2011). Stories and statistics: Describing a mixed-methods study of effective classroom practice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(2), 103–125.
MedleyD. M. (1982). Teacher effectiveness. In MitzelH., Encyclopedia of educational research, 5th edn (pp. 1841–1851). New York: Free Press.
11.
Milanowski, A. T., Kimball, S. M., & Odden, A. R. (2005). Teacher accountability measures and links to learning. In R. Rubenstein et al. (Eds.), Measuring school performance & efficiency: Implications for practice and research. Yearbook of the American Education Finance Association (pp. 133–188). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
12.
NICHD. (2001). Fifth Grade School Observation Procedures Manual; NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
13.
PiantaR. C.La ParoK. M.HamreB. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System™: Manual K-3. Paul H Brookes Publishing.
14.
PumaM. J.OlsenR. B.BellS. H.PriceC. (2009). What to do when data are missing in group randomized controlled trials. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
15.
SammonsP.KoJ. (2008). Using Systematic Classroom Observation Schedules to Investigate Effective Teaching: Overview of quantitative findings. Swindon: A report submitted to the Economic and Social Research Council, August 2008.
ShapiroE. S.HeickP. (2004). School psychologist assessment practices in the evaluation of students referred for social/behavioural/emotional problems. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 551–561.
18.
StipekD. (1999). Instructional environment observation scale. University of California: MacArthur Pathways through Middle Childhood Network.
19.
SugandhiC.YasadhaP.KannanM. (2011). Analysis of a population of cataract patients databases in WEKA tool. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research,2(1), 1–5.
20.
TabachnickG. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Duxbury.
21.
TwalaB. (2005). Effective techniques for handling incomplete data using decision trees. Unpublished PhD thesis, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
22.
TwalaB. (2013). Impact of noise on credit risk prediction does data quality matter?. Intelligent Data Analysis, 17(6), 1115–1134.
TwalaB.JonesM. C.HandD. J. (2008). Good methods for coping with missing data in decision trees. Pattern Recognition Letters, 29, 950–956.
25.
TwalaB.PhorahM. (2010). Predicting incomplete gene microarray data with the use of supervised learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(13), 2061–2069.
26.
VijayaraniS.MuthulakshmiM. (2013). Comparative analysis of Bayes and lazy classification algorithms. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 2(8).
