Online teaching is not a new method. The current pandemic forced online learning predominantly. This study attempted to study the determinants of online learning and mediating role of facilitator. The covariance analysis of the proposed model revealed that the facilitator along with technological factors is significant. Similarly, the covariance coefficient of interaction with mentoring was found to be significant. The data has been collected from the students of higher educational institutions located in the northern region of India. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is done to analyze the impact on respective factors. The correlation matrix explained the relationship between different factors. The facilitator and interaction are significant determinants of learning which validate our hypothesis. The mediation model assesses whether a facilitator playing the mediating role in explaining the relationship between learning and interaction has come out to be significant.
AndersonA.BarhamN.NorthcoteM. T. (2013). Using the TPACK framework to unite disciplines in online learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.24
AppanaS. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.
4.
BaberH. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292
5.
BaileyC. J.CardK. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: perception of experienced instructors. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 152–155. ISSN 1096-7516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.002
BozkurtA.SharmaR. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to coronavirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi. Accessed July 24, 2020. http://asianjde.org/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/447.
8.
BrillJ. M.GallowayC. (2007). Perils and promises: university instructors’ integration of technology in class-room based practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 58(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00601.x
9.
CroxtonR. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314.
10.
EllisR. A.BliucA. M. (2019). Exploring new elements of the student approaches to learning framework: the role of online learning technologies in student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417721384
11.
FrankM. (2006). How to teach using Today's Technology: matching the teaching strategy to the E-learning approach. In Tan Wee HinL.SubramaniamR. (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy in technology at the K-12 level (pp. 372–393). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-494-1.ch021.
12.
FulfordC. P.ZhangS. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: the critical predictor in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649309526830
13.
Gómez-ReyP.BarberaE.Fernández-NavarroF. (2018). Students’ perceptions about online teaching effectiveness: a bottom-up approach for identifying online instructors’ roles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 1. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3437
14.
HronA.FriedrichH. F. (2003). A review of web-based collaborative learning: factors beyond technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00007.x
15.
KuH. Y.LohrL. L. (2003). A case study of Chinese student's attitudes toward their first online learning experience. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504557
PeltierJ. W.SchibrowskyJ. A.DragoW. (2007). The interdependence of the factors influencing the perceived quality of the online learning experience: a causal model. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475307302016
18.
RajaR.NagasubramaniP. C. (2018). The impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.165
19.
SmartK. L.CappelJ. J. (2006). Students’ perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5(1), 201–219. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved December 16, 2020. https://doi.org/10.28945/243
20.
TintoV. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089
21.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. The University of Chicago Press.
22.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
23.
VonderwellS.ZachariahS. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2005.10782457
