A learning management system (LMS) is a critical technology platform for teaching and learning for nearly all institutions of higher education. Although an LMS is a driving force in online courses, it is not given in traditional face-to-face environments. The problem is an underutilization of an LMS in face-to-face higher education courses. This qualitative narrative inquiry study explored experiences of 20 instructors utilizing Blackboard Learn in traditional face-to-face courses. One overarching research question guided this study: What are the experiences of faculty and adjunct instructors concerning the use of LMSs in traditional face-to-face courses in higher education? The results identified the features and tools in the LMS used most frequently and how they were used in the LMS. Based on this study, it is possible to better understand the educational potential of the LMS to enhance traditional face-to-face courses.
AdzharuddinN. (2013).
Learning management system (LMS) among university students: Does it work?International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning,
3(3), 248–252. doi:10.7763/IJEEEE.2013.V3.233
2.
AgostoD. E.CopelandA. J.ZachL. (2013).
Testing the benefits of blended education: Using social technology to foster collaboration and knowledge sharing in face-to-face LIS courses. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science,
54(2), 94–107. Retrieved from http://www.alise.org/jelis-2
3.
BeckfordC.,MugisaE. (2014). Learning management systems – The current picture. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2014 (pp. 153–163). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/148946
4.
BousbahiF.AlrazganM. S. (2015).
Investigating IT faculty resistance to learning management system adoption using latent variables in an acceptance technology model. The Scientific World Journal,
2015, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2015/375651
5.
CavusN.AlhihM. S. (2014).
Learning management systems use in science education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,
143, 517–520. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.429
6.
CervenanskáM. (2013).
Need and importance of technology in education. Technologia Vzdelavania,
21(1), 1–2. Retrieved from http://technologiavzdelavania.ukf.sk
7.
ChawL. Y.TangC. M. (2018).
What makes learning management systems effective for learning?Journal of Educational Technology Systems,
47(2), 152–169. doi:10.1177/0047239518795828
8.
ClandininD. J. (2013). Engaging in narrative inquiry.
Walnut Creek, CA:
Left Coast Press.
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (3rd ed.).
Los Angeles, CA:
Sage.
10.
DavisR.SurajballiV. (2014).
Successful implementation and use of a learning management system. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,
45(9), 379–381. doi:10.3928/00220124-20140825-12
11.
DeksissaT.LiangL. R.BeheraP.HarknessS. J. (2014).
Fostering significant learning in sciences. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,
8(2), 12. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/
12.
DiasS. B.DinizJ. A. (2014).
Towards an enhanced learning management system for blended learning in higher education incorporating distinct learners’ profiles. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,
17(1), 307–319. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org
13.
ForoughiA. (2015).
The theory of connectivism: Can it explain and guide learning in the digital age?Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice,
15(5), 11. Retrieved from http://www.na-businesspress.com/jhetpopen.html
14.
GomezJ. F. (2015). Higher education faculty use of a learning management system in face-to-face classes (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1687759824)
15.
HodgesC.GrantM. (2015). Theories to support you: Purposeful use of learning management system features. In T. Bastiaens, & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn 2015 (pp. 481–486). Berlin, Germany: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.editlib.org/p/150895/
16.
KaewkiriyaT.SagaR.TsujiH. (2013).
Framework for distributed e-learning management system. Journal of Computers,
8(7), 1635–1647. doi:10.4304/jcp.8.7.1635-1647
17.
LentoC. (2016).
Promoting active learning in introductory financial accounting through the flipped classroom design. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education,
8(1), 72–87. doi:10.1108/JARHE-01-2015-0005
18.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation.
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
19.
NeumanW. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.).
Boston, MA:
Allyn and Bacon.
20.
NkonkiV.NtlabathiS. (2016).
The forms and functions of teaching and learning innovations on Blackboard: Substantial or superficial?The Electronic Journal of e-Learning,
14(4), 257–265. Retrieved from www.ejel.org
21.
OutlawV. (2014). Descriptive study exploring faculty’s perceptions when transitioning to a new learning management system (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1620540780)
PiñaA. A. (2013). Learning management systems: A look at the big picture. In KatsY. (Ed.), Learning management systems and instructional design: Best practices in online education (pp. 1–19).
Hershey, PA:
IGI Global.
24.
PsycharisS.ChalatzoglidisG.MichailK. (2013).
Moodle as a learning environment in promoting conceptual understanding for secondary school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,
9(1), 11–21. Retrieved from http://www.ejmste.com/
25.
QuirkM. (2015). A narrative inquiry assessing social networking influences on professional socialization (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1783602419)
26.
RhodeJ.RichterS.GowenP.MillerT.WillsC. (2017).
Understanding faculty use of the learning management system. Online Learning,
21(3), 68–86. doi:10.24059/olj.v21i3.1217
27.
SaelerA. (2015). The relationship of student satisfaction and academic achievement in online versus traditional education (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1706284158)
28.
SchoonenboomJ. (2014).
Using an adapted, task-level technology acceptance model to explain why instructors in higher education intend to use some learning management system tools more than others. Computers & Education,
71, 247–256. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.016
29.
SerdyukovP.SerdyukovaN. (2015).
Effects of communication, socialization and collaboration on online learning. European Scientific Journal,
2, 86–100. Retrieved from http://eujournal.org/
30.
ShankG. D. (2006). Qualitative research: A personal skills approach (2nd ed.).
Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Education.
31.
StantchevV.Colomo-PalaciosR.Soto-AcostaP.MisraS. (2014).
Learning management systems and cloud file hosting services: A study on students’ acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior,
31, 612. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.002
32.
StoneD. E.ZhengG. (2014). Learning management systems in a changing environment. In WangV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on education and technology in a changing society (pp. 756–767).
Hershey, PA:
Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6046-5
33.
Toven-LindseyB.RhoadsR. A.LozanoJ. B. (2015).
Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education,
24, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001
34.
TumblesonB. E.BurkeJ. J. (2014). Embedding librarianship in learning management systems: A how-to-do-it manual for librarians.
Chicago, IL:
American Library Association.
35.
United States Department of Education. (2016). Integrated postsecondary education data system.
Washington, DC:
National Center for Education Statistics.
WangZ.ChenL.AndersonT. (2014).
A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,
15(2), 98–118. Retrieved from www.irrodl.org
38.
WichadeeS. (2015).
Factors related to faculty members’ attitude and adoption of a learning management system. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,
14(4), 53–61. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
