Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This research sought to determine what impact a social network messaging app could have on student’s team project performance. The app allowed students to self-select teams based on user profiles within the app. The study investigated three hypotheses that measured the apps impact on the quality of completed team projects, the team’s sense of shared goals, and team cohesiveness. The findings suggested that social network messaging apps that provide a sense of common ground between team members may better engage students in project teamwork which could lead to improved learning and better team cohesiveness.

Keywords

team formation social networking shared interests team cohesiveness project quality social media instant messaging

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

(2013). Unhappy employees outnumber happy ones by two to one worldwide. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2013/10/10/unhappy-employees-outnumber-happy-ones-by-two-to-one-worldwide/#3a030a82362a

Aldrich

Kim

(2007). Small worlds, infinite possibilities? How social networks affect entrepreneurial team formation and search. Strategic Entrepreneurship, 1, 147–165.

Birds-Beep Blog. (2018). Instant messaging app user statistics. Retrieved from http://www.birdsbeep.com/blog_detail/548/

Carron

A. V.

Brawley

L. R.

(2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31, 89–106.

Cheung

C. M.

Chiu

P. Y.

Lee

M. K.

(2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343.

Deloitte. (2017). The digital workplace. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/mx/Documents/human-capital/The_digital_workplace.pdf

Facts & Trends. (2017). 10 traits of generation Z. Retrieved from https://factsandtrends.net/2017/09/29/10-traits-of-generation-z/

Globoforce. (2014). The hidden economics of work friendships. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/globoforce/e-book-surprising-economics-of-work-friendshipsv5-42726989

Granovetter

(1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

10.

Hamid

Waycott

Kurnia

Chang

(2015). Understanding students’ perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 1–9.

11.

Heun

(2017). Team messaging apps go mainstream, could have ripple effect. Retrieved from https://searchunifiedcommunications.techtarget.com/feature/Team-messaging-apps-go-mainstream-could-have-ripple-effect

12.

Karpinski

A. C.

Kirschner

P. A.

Ozer

Mellott

J. A.

Ochwo

(2013). An exploration of social networking site use, multitasking, and academic performance among United States and European university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1182–1192.

13.

Lin

K. Y.

H. P.

(2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152–1161.

14.

McCarroll

Curran

(2013). Social networking in education. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE), 4(1), 1–15.

15.

McKenna

Green

Y. A.

Glenson

A. S.

Marci

E. J.

(2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9–31.

16.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

17.

Murray

K. E.

Waller

(2007). Social networking goes abroad. International Educator, 16(3), 56–59.

18.

Park

Kee

K. F.

Valenzuela

(2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729–733.

19.

Roblyer

M. D.

McDaniel

Webb

Herman

Witty

J. V.

(2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140.

20.

Smith

Anderson

(2018). Social media use in 2018. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/

21.

Uptmor

(2017). How social media can improve project productivity. Retrieved from https://www.clarizen.com/social-media-can-improve-project-productivity/

22.

Warck School of Business. (2013). Social media is helping workers become more productive. Retrieved from https://www.wbs.ac.uk/news/social-media-is-helping-workers-become-more-productive/

23.

Wolf

(2015). 5 benefits of social media for teamwork. Retrieved from https://www.govloop.com/community/blog/5-benefits-social-media-teamwork/

24.

Yukelson

Weinberg

Jackson

(1984). A multidimensional group cohesion instrument for intercollegiate basketball teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 103–117.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

0.01 MB