Since the advent of Second Life in 2004, immersive virtual-reality (VR) environments have been readily available to educators; more recent open-source environments have reduced costs significantly. This study reports on data gathered from an avatar-based immersive experience where teacher-education students gathered in VR spaces for synchronous meetings, learning how to maneuver within the environment, modify their avatars’ appearances, and develop preliminary three-dimensional building perspectives. Student reports and instructor observations throughout the course and a final student self-evaluation provided insights into both the challenges experienced and effective practices within this immersive VR environment. Overall, students developed significant trust and camaraderie with their colleagues as they went through problem-solving experiences, finding that initial challenges often subsided with the help of course colleagues. Students enjoyed the experience and considered VR applications for their classrooms. The report concludes with general recommendations for the design of productive VR learning environments within many different settings.
BarberW.KigS.BuchananS. (2015).
Problem-based learning and authentic assessment in digital pedagogy: Embracing the role of collaborative communities. Electronic Journal of E-Learning,
13(2), 59–67.
2.
BishopC.HongR. (2012). Building community: Effective strategies to increase interaction in online learning. In RestaP. (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 1106–1111).
Chesapeake, VA:
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
3.
BoughzalaI.de VreedeG.LimayemM. (2012).
Team collaboration in virtual worlds: Editorial to the special issue. Journal of the Association for Information Systems,
13(10), 714–734.
4.
ChertoffD. B.SchatzS. L.McDanielR.BowersC. A. (2008).
Improving presence theory through experiential design. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments,
17(4), 405–413.
5.
DawleyL.DedeC. (2014). Situated learning in virtual worlds and immersive simulations. In Michael SpectorJ.David MerrillM.ElenJ.BishopM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications & technology (pp. 723–734).
New York, NY:
Springer.
6.
DomingoJ. R.BradleyE. G. (2018).
Education student perceptions of virtual reality as a learning tool. Journal of Educational Technology Systems,
46(3), 329–342.
7.
FrostR. D.MattaV.MacIvorE. (2015).
Assessing the efficacy of incorporating game dynamics in a learning management system. Journal of Information Systems Education,
26(1), 59–70.
8.
HakulinenL.AuvinenT.KorhonenA. (2015).
The effect of achievement badges on students’ behavior: An empirical study in a university-level computer science course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning,
10(1), 18–29.
LudlowB. L. (2015).
Virtual reality: Emerging applications and future directions. Rural Special Education Quarterly,
34(3), 3–10.
11.
MartinA. (2014). Motivating learners with virtual reality. In ViteliJ.LeikomaaM. (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2014 (pp. 2631–2636).
Chesapeake, VA:
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
12.
McArdleG.MonohanT.BertolottoM. (2009).
Usability testing of a collaborative and interactive university on a mobile device. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies,
3(4), 24–32.
13.
McManimonS. (2011). Constructivist approach to employing virtual reality learning environments in instruction. In KoehlerM.MishraP. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 2161–2164).
Chesapeake, VA:
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
14.
MonetaG. B.CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996).
The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality,
64(2), 275–310.
15.
O’ConnorE. A. (2010).
Instructional and design elements that support effective use of virtual worlds: What graduate student work reveals about second life. Journal of Educational Technology Systems,
38(2), 213–234.
16.
O’ConnorE. A.DomingoJ. (2017).
A practical guide, with theoretical underpinnings, for creating effective virtual reality learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology Systems,
45(3), 343–364.
17.
PellasN.KazanidisI. (2014).
Engaging students in blended and online collaborative courses at university level through second life: Comparative perspectives and instructional affordances. New Review of Hypermedia & Multimedia,
20(2), 123–144.
18.
PiagetJ. (1950). The psychology of intelligence.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
19.
RichardsonJ. C.ArbaughJ. B.Cleveland-InnesM.IceP.SwanK. P.GarrisonD. R. (2012). Using the community of inquiry framework to inform effective instructional design. In MollerL.HuettJ. B. (Eds.), Next generation of distance education (pp. 97–125).
New York, NY:
Springer.
20.
RichardsonJ. J.LowenthalP. P. (2017).
Instructor social presence: A neglected component of the community of inquiry. The International Scientific Conference E-Learning & Software for Education,
2, 2531–536.
21.
SchmeilA.EpplerM.deFreitasS. (2012).
A structured approach for designing collaboration experiences for virtual worlds. Journal of the Association for Information Systems,
13(10), 836–860.
22.
SquireK.JenkinsH. (2003).
Harnessing the power of games in education. Insight,
3, 5–33.
23.
StoneS. J. (2009, January 1). Instructors’ perceptions of three-dimensional (3D) virtual worlds: Instructional use, implementation and benefits for adult learners. Retrieved from https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/handle/1840.16/4826
24.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.
Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
25.
VeselyP.BloomL.SherlockJ. (2007).
Key elements of building online community: Comparing faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,
3(3). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol3no3/vesely.pdf
26.
VezinaN.IsaBelleC.FournierH.DufresneA.DoucetJ. J. (2004). 3D Virtual reality, motivation, sense of belonging and perseverance. In CantoniL.McLoughlinC. (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2004 (pp. 1677–1682).
Chesapeake, VA:
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
27.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
28.
WildeJ. (2010). More than a place to meet (virtually): What educators tell us about second life. In HerringtonJ.MontgomerieC. (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2010 (pp. 3866–3874).
Chesapeake, VA:
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
29.
WoodsB.WhitworthE.HadziomerovicA.FisetJ. P.DormannC.CaquardS., … BiddleR. (2005). Repurposing a computer role playing game for engaging learning. In KommersP.RichardsG. (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2005 (pp. 4430–4435).
Chesapeake, VA:
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
30.
YücelU.UsluelY. (2016).
Knowledge building and the quantity, content and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education,
97, 31–48.
