Quality Matters is recognized as a rigorous set of standards that guide the designer or instructor to design quality online courses. We explore how Quality Matters standards guide the identification and analysis of learning analytics data to monitor and improve online learning. Descriptive data were collected for frequency of use, time spent, and performance and analyzed to identify patterns and trends on how students interact with online course components based on the Quality Matters standards. Major findings of this article provide a framework and guidance for instructors on how data might be collected and analyzed to improve online learning effectiveness.
AliL.AsadiM.GaševicD.JovanovicJ.HatalaM. (2013) Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: An empirical study. Computers & Education62: 130–148.
2.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States, 2013. Oakland, CA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/grade-change-2013.
Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. New York, NY: ACM.
5.
ChyungS. Y. (2001) Systematic and systemic approaches to reducing attrition rates in online higher education. American Journal of Distance Education15(3): 36–49.
6.
Dietz-UhlerB.FisherA.HanA. (2007) Designing online courses to promote student retention. Journal of Educational Technology Systems36(1): 105–112.
7.
FritzJ. (2011) Classroom walls that talk: Using online course activity data of successful students to raise self-awareness of underperforming peers. The Internet and Higher Education14(2): 89–97.
8.
Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K., (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2011-Horizon-Report.pdf.
LoafmanL.AltmanB. W.IntroductionI. (2014) Going online: Building your business law course using the Quality Matters Rubric. Journal of Legal Studies Education31(1): 21–54.
11.
MacfadyenL. P.DawsonS. (2010) Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education54(11): 588–599.
12.
ParkJ. H.ChoiH. J. (2009) Factors influencing adult learners' decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society12(4): 207–217.
13.
Sener, J. (2011). Quality Matters data mining project: Preliminary research findings (Unpublished final report). Quality Matters, Annapolis, MD.
14.
Serrano-LagunaÁ.TorrenteJ.Moreno-GerP.Fernández-ManjónB. (2012) Tracing a little for big improvements: Application of learning analytics and videogames for student assessment. Procedia Computer Science15: 203–209.
15.
Shattuck, K. (2012). What we're learning from Quality Matters-focused research: Research, practice, continuous improvement. Annapolis, MD: Maryland Online.
