This qualitative study explores how high school students develop diplomatic competencies through extracurricular participation, personal experiences with global issues, and individual learning goals. Utilizing thematic analysis, we collected data from students’ reflective assignments to identify key themes. Our findings suggest that young people’s engagement in clubs and leadership roles supports diplomatic skill development, as their encounters with challenges, such as discrimination and poverty, deepen their global awareness and motivation. Further, students demonstrate passions for diverse global topics and issues, underscoring the need for experiential and inclusive learning that aligns with their aspirations. This study contributes to the literature by foregrounding student perspectives and examining the interplay between structured activities and authentic students’ engagement in shaping diplomacy-related competencies. Based on the findings, our recommendations include integrating skill-based learning into curricula, expanding simulation-based training, and fostering cross-cultural exchanges.
AcostaM.SzlamkaZ.Mostajo-RadjiM. A. (2020). Transnational youth networks: An evolving form of public diplomacy to accelerate the sustainable development goals. OSF. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/8247s/
2.
AderibigbeS. (2024). Course redesign for authentic learning and active citizenship: A general education course context. In AbdallahA. K.AlkaabiA. M.Al-RiyamiR. (Eds.), Cutting-edge innovations in teaching, leadership, technology, and assessment (pp. 68–82). IGI Global. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/88268.
3.
AderibigbeS. A.IdrizM.AlzouebiK.AlOthmanH.HamdiW. B.CompanioniA. A. (2023). Fostering tolerance and respect for diversity through the fundamentals of Islamic education. Religion, 14(2), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020212
4.
AlakasheeB.Al GharaibehF.El-MneizelA.AderibigbeS. (2022). Teachers’ views about school students’ behavioral problems in the Emirate of Sharjah: An exploratory study. Heliyon, 8(6), e09756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09756
5.
Boix MansillaV.JacksonA. W. (Eds.). (2022). Educating for global competence: Preparing our students to engage the world (2nd ed.). ASCD.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (Eds.). (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
8.
Cuellar-RamirezP. (2021). Science diplomacy for climate action and sustainable development in Latin America and the Caribbean: How important is the early career perspective to new governance?Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6, Article 657771. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.657771
9.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
GrazianiS. (2019). The roots of China’s policy in Africa. The role of youth in Beijing’s «People’s Diplomacy» in the 1950s. Rivista Italiana di Storia Internazionale, 2, 235–264. https://doi.org/10.30461/96502
15.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
16.
HamdiW. B.AderibigbeS. A.IdrizM.AlghfeliM. M. (2024). Faith in humanity: Religious charitable organizations solidarity towards migrants in the United Arab Emirates. Religion, 15(3), 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030266
17.
iCivics. (n.d). Interactive civics education for the next generation. iCivics. https://icivics.org
18.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation. (2020). UAE-China virtual culture week. https://www.mofaic.gov.ae/en/news
19.
MoonJ. A. (2006). Learning Journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development. Routledge.
20.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.
NowellL. S.NorrisJ. M.WhiteD. E.MoulesN. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
24.
NtuliE.NyarambiA. (2015). Learning in a global context: Education diplomacy in primary grade content preparation. Childhood Education, 91, 111–116.
25.
PersaudA.MurphyY. G. (2019). School leadership and education diplomacy. Childhood Education, 95, 20–28.
26.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (Eds.). (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
27.
SamorodovaE. A.MartynovaO. I.LobatyukV. (2023). The formative role of “Model UN” in the development of the professional personality of diplomats. In BylievaD.NordmannA. (Eds.), The world of games: Technologies for experimenting, thinking, learning. PCSF 2023. Lecture Notes in networks and Systems (Vol. 829, pp. 187–197). Springer.
28.
SjolieH.OlsenC. F.HempelM. F. (2024). Attachments or affiliations? The impact of social media on the quality of peer Relationships—A qualitative study among Norwegian high school students. Youth & Society, 56(4), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x231171180
29.
Soliya. (2022). Virtual exchange programs: Bridging cultural divides. Soliya. https://soliya.net
30.
SuetaniS. (2019). Mental disorders and physical activity: Epidemiological analyses using Australian datasets [PhD Thesis, The University of Queensland] https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2019.592
31.
SustarsicM.ChengB. (2022). Public diplomacy and exchange programs at a secondary school level: Alumni experiences. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 87, 119–130.
TranL. T.BuiH.NguyenM. N. (2023). Youth agency in public diplomacy: Australian youth participation in outbound mobility and connection building between Australia and the Indo-Pacific region. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 32(2), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2021.2017784
XiaoJ. J.NewmanB. M.ChuB. S. (2018). Career preparation of high school students: A multi-country study. Youth & Society, 50(6), 818–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x16638690
