Cyberbullying can have a variety of negative effects on student mental health (Internet Safety Technical Task Force, 2008). An understanding of students’ coping with cyberbullying could help researchers and professionals to determine ways to alleviate and/or prevent the negative effects of cyberbullying. Qualitative methods were used to provide an in-depth examination of coping with cyberbullying. The results revealed three primary coping themes as follows: reactive coping, preventive coping, and no way to prevent cyberbullying. Reactive coping included avoiding the cyberbully situation by deleting or ignoring messages. Preventive coping strategies included talk in person and increased security and awareness. Some students reported that there was no way to reduce cyberbullying. These strategies were interpreted in terms of current theories of coping and findings suggested a need for a new comprehensive model of coping with cyberbullying. In addition, implications for future research and practice were discussed.
AgatstonP.KowaskiR.LimberS. (2007). Students’ perspectives on cyber bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S59-S60.
2.
BakemanR.GottmanJ. M. (1986). Observing interactions: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ChibbaroS. (2007). School counselors and the cyberbully: Interventions and implications. Professional School Counseling, 11(1), 65-68.
4.
CreswellJ. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
5.
David-FerdonC.HertzM. F. (2007). Electronic media, violence, and adolescents: An emerging public health problem. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S1-S5.
6.
DehueF.BolmanS.VollinkT. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11, 217-223.
7.
DiamandurosR.DownsE.JenkinsS. (2008). The role of school psychologists in the assessment, preventions, and intervention of cyberbullying. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 693-704.
8.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative Research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
9.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. (2007). Offline consequences of online victimization: School violence and delinquency. Journal of School Violence, 6(3), 89-112.
10.
Internet Safety Technical Task Force. (2008). Enhancing child safety & online technologies. Cambridge, MA: Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University.
11.
KowalskiR. M.LimberS. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22-S30.
12.
KowalskiR.LimberS.AgatstonP. (2008). Cyber bullying: Bullying in the digital age. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
13.
LazarusR. S. (2006). Emotions and interpersonal relationships: Toward a person-centered conceptualization of emotions and coping. Journal of Personality, 74, 9-46.
14.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
15.
LeCompteM.SchensulJ. (1999). Designing and conducting ethnographic research. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
16.
LiQ. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27, 157-170.
17.
MasonK. (2008). Cyberbulling: A preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 323-348.
18.
MishnaF.SainiM.SolomonS. (2009). Ongoing and online: Children and youth’s perceptions of cyber bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1222-1228.
19.
MitchellK.YbarraM.FinkelhorD. (2007). The relative important of online victimization in understanding depression, delinquency, and substance abuse. Child Maltreat, 12, 314-324.
20.
NastasiB. (2009). Advances in qualitative research. In GutkinT.ReynoldsC. (Eds.), The Handbook of School Psychology (4th ed., pp. 30-53). Danvers, MA: John Wiley.
21.
PatchinJ. W.HindujaS. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 148-169.
22.
RideoutV.FoehrU.RobertsD. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
23.
RothS.CohenL. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41, 813-819.
24.
SchensulJ.LeCompteM.NastasiB.BorgattiS. (1999). Enhanced ethnographic methods: Audiovisual techniques, focused group interviews, and elicitation techniques. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
25.
SchensulS.SchensulJ.LeCompteM. (1999). Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews, and questionnaires. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
26.
SkinnerE.EdgeK.AltmanJ.SherwoodH. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216-269.
27.
SlonjeR.SmithP. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147-154.
28.
SmithP.MahdaviJ.CarvalhoM.FisherS.RussellS.TippettN. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376-385.
29.
SmithP.SmithC.SamaraM. (2008). A content analysis of school anti-bullying policies: Progress and limitations. Educational Psychology in Practice, 24, 1-12.
30.
SpearsB.SleeP.OwensL.JohnsonB. (2009). Behind the scenes and screens: Insights into the human dimension of covert and cyberbullying. Journal of Psychology, 217, 189-196.
31.
StaceyE. (2009). Research into cyberbullying: Student perspectives on cybersafe learning Environments. Informatics in Education—An International Journal, 8, 115-130.
32.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
TenenbaumL. S.VarjasK.MeyersJ.ParrisL. (2011). Coping strategies and perceived effectiveness in fourth through eighth grade victims of bullying. School Psychology International, 32(3), 263-287. doi: 10.1177/014303431140230910.1177/0143034311402309.
34.
VarjasK.HenrichC.MeyersJ. (2009). Urban middle school students’ perceptions of bullying, cyberbullying and school safety. Journal of School Violence, 8, 159-176.
35.
VarjasK.NatstasiB. K.MooreR. B.JayasenaA. (2005). Using ethnographic methods for development of culture-specific interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 241-258.
36.
YbarraM.Diener-WestM.LeafP. (2007). Examining the overlap in internet harassment school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S42-S50.
37.
YbarraM.MitchellK. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1308-1316.
