Research suggests that cyberbullying is more harmful than traditional bullying and can cause more profound harm to individuals. The study aimed to examine the effects of cyberbullying victimization on junior high school students’ cyberbullying over time while exploring the mediating role of loneliness and the moderating role of perceived social support. Four self-report questionnaires were administered to 561 middle school students at three time points. Data were analyzed using SPSS for descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis. Moderated mediated effects tests were performed on the variables using SPSS Process. T1 cyberbullying victimization in middle school students predicts T2 cyberbullying behavior. T2 loneliness mediates the role of T1 cyberbullying victimization in influencing T2 cyberbullying. T2 perceived social support moderated the second half of the mediating role pathway. First, there are many mediators and moderators of cyberbullying victimization that affect cyberbullying, and others need to be examined. Second, only three middle schools in China were selected as investigators for this study, and future studies could select different populations to verify the applicability of the findings. Cyberbullying victimization can increase cyberbullying. Reducing cyberbullying requires attention to psychological and behavioral changes in cyberbullying victims.
AratóN.ZsidóA. N.RivnyákA.PeleyB.LabadiB. (2022). Risk and protective factors in cyberbullying: The role of family, social support and emotion regulation. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 4(2), 160–173.
2.
AsherS. R.PaquetteJ. A. (2003). Loneliness and peer relations in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 75–78.
3.
BaldryA. C.FarringtonD. P.SorrentinoA. (2015). “Am I at risk of cyberbullying”? A narrative review and conceptual framework for research on risk of cyberbullying and cybervictimization: The risk and needs assessment approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 36–51.
4.
BanninkR.BroerenS.van de Looij–JansenP. M.de WaartF. G.RaatH. (2014). Cyber and traditional bullying victimization as a risk factor for mental health problems and suicidal ideation in adolescents. PLoS ONE, 9(4), Article e94026.
5.
BarreraM. (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(4), 413–445.
6.
BrissetteI.ScheierM. F.CarverC. S. (2002). The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psychological adjustment during a life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 102–111.
7.
CacioppoJ. T.HawkleyL. C.ErnstJ. M.BurlesonM.BerntsonG. G.NourianiB.SpiegelD. (2006). Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6), 1054–1085.
8.
CalveteE.OrueI.EstévezA.VillardónL.PadillaP. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128–1135.
9.
CamachoA.Ortega-RuizR.RomeraE. M. (2021). Longitudinal associations between cybervictimization, anger rumination, and cyberaggression. Aggressive Behavior, 47(3), 332–342.
10.
ChanH. C. O.WongD. S. (2015). Traditional school bullying and cyberbullying in Chinese societies: Prevalence and a review of the whole-school intervention approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 98–108.
ChuX.LiY.WangP.ZengP.LeiL. (2021). Social support and cyberbullying for university students: The mediating role of internet addiction and the moderating role of stress. Current Psychology, 42(6), 1–9.
13.
FantiK. A.DemetriouA. G.HawaV. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining riskand protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 168–181.
14.
Fernández-AnteloI.Cuadrado-GordilloI. (2018). Divergent perceptual processes on cyberbullying between victims and aggressors: Construction of explanatory models. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 396.
15.
HaysR. D.DiMatteoM. R. (1987). A short-form measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51(1), 69–81.
16.
HeerdeJ. A.HemphillS. A. (2018). Examination of associations between informal help-seeking behavior, social support, and ado- lescent psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 47, 44–62.
17.
KowalskiR. M.MorganC. A.Drake-LavelleK.AllisonB. (2016). Cyberbullying among college students with disabilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 57(C), 416–427.
18.
LiC.WangP.Martin-MoratinosM.Bella-FernandezM.Blasco-FontecillaH. (2024). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying in the digital age and its associated mental health problems in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. European child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 33(9), 2895–2909.
Olenik-ShemeshD.HeimanT. (2017). Cyberbullying victimization in adolescents as related to body esteem, social support, and social self-efficacy. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 178(1), 28–43.
21.
OnishiA.KawabataY.KurokawaM.YoshidaT. (2012). A mediating model of relational aggression, narcissistic orientations, guilt feelings, and perceived classroom norms. School Psychology International, 33(4), 367–390.
22.
PatchinJ. W.HindujaS. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem*. Journal of School Health, 80(12), 614–621.
23.
PerrenS.DooleyJ.ShawT.CrossD. (2010). Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 4(1), 28.
24.
RodelliM.De BourdeaudhuijI.DumonE.PortzkyG.DesmetA. (2018). Which healthy lifestyle factors are associated with a lower risk of suicidal ideation among adolescents faced with cyberbullying. Preventive Medicine, 113, 32–40.
25.
RosenstockI. M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 328–335.
26.
ScholteR. H. J.EngelsR. C. M. E.OverbeekG.de KempR. A. T.HaselagerG. J. T. (2007). Stability in bullying and victimization and its association with social adjustment in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 217–228.
27.
SeedsP. M.HarknessK. L.QuiltyL. C. (2010). Parental maltreatment, bullying, and adolescent depression: Evidence for the mediating role of perceived social support. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39(5), 681–692.
28.
SelkieE. M.KotaR.ChanY. F.MorenoM. (2015). Cyberbullying, depression, and problem alcohol use in female college students: A multisite study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(2), 79–86.
29.
ShapkaJ. D.MaghsoudiR. (2017). Examining the validity and reliability of the cyber-aggression and cyber-victimization scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 10–17.
30.
SingstadM. T.WallanderJ. L.LydersenS.WichstrømL.KayedN. S. (2020). Perceived social support among adolescents in Residential Youth Care. Child & Family Social Work, 25(2), 384–393.
31.
SmithP. K.MahdaviJ.CarvalhoM.FisherS.RussellS.TippettN. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385.
32.
WangL.NgaiS. S. (2020). The effects of anonymity, invisibility, asynchrony, and moral disengagement on cyberbullying perpetration among school-aged children in China. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, Article 105613.
33.
WangX.WangX.MaH. (1999). Handbook of mental health rating scales (Updated Edition). Chinese Journal of Mental Health.
34.
XieX. L.ZhengH.JuK.XiaoB. W.LiuJ. S.JenniferD. S. (2022). Reliability test of the Chinese version of the short-form cyberbullying and cyberbullying victimization scale. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30(5), 1155–1159.
35.
ZhuY.LiW.O’BrienJ. E.LiuT. (2021). Parent–child attachment moderates the associations between cyberbullying victimization and adolescents’ health/mental health problems: An exploration of cyberbullying victimization among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17–18), NP9272–NP9298.
36.
ZimetG. D.DahlemN. W.ZimetS. G.FarleyG. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41.
37.
ZychI.BaldryA. C.FarringtonD. P.LlorentV. J. (2019). Are children involved in cyberbullying low on empathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on empathy versus different cyberbullying roles. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 83–97.
