The goal of this study was to investigate the moderating effect of parental mediation in the longitudinal associations among cyberbullying bystanding, depression, subjective health complaints, and self-harm. Participants were 1,067 seventh and eighth graders (M age = 13.93; 50% female) from the suburbs of a large Midwestern city in the United States. Restrictive parental mediation and instructive parental mediation strategies moderated the relationships examined in this study. Increases in restrictive parental mediation strengthened the association between cyberbullying bystanding and depression, subjective health complaints, and self-harm. High instructive parental mediation weakened these associations. These findings underscore the importance of developing interventions that increase parents’ awareness of how to implement effective parental mediation strategies. Parental intervention programs that focus on parents’ role in mitigating their children’s exposure to cyberbullying and how they can help reduce the associated negative outcomes should be developed.
Arrizabalaga-CrespoC.Aierbe-BarandiaranA.Medrano-SamaniegoC. (2010). Internet uses and parental mediation in adolescents with ADHD. Revista Latina de Comunicación, 65, 561–571. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-65-2010-919-561-571-EN
2.
ClarkeK.CooperP.CreswellC. (2013). The Parental Overprotection Scale: Associations with child and parental anxiety. Journal of Affective Disorders, 151(2), 618–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.07.007
EvansC. B. R.SmokowskiP.RoseR. A.MercadoM. C.MarshallK. J. (2018). Cumulative bullying experiences, adolescent behavior and mental health, and academic achievement: An integrative model of perpetration, victimization, and bystander behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 2415–2428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1078-4
5.
GriggD. W. (2010). Cyber-aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.143
6.
Harmon-JonesE.MillsJ. (1999). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. American Psychological Association.
7.
HauglandS.WoldB. (2001). Subjective health complaints in adolescence – Reliability and validity of survey methods. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2000.0393
8.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129–156.
9.
HuangY.ChouC. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1581–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005
10.
INTECO. (2009). Study on safe habits in the use of ICT by children and adolescents and e-trust of their parents.
11.
KutherT. L. (1999). A developmental-contextual perspective on youth covictimization by community violence. Adolescence, 34(136), 699–714.
12.
LereyaS. T.SamaraM.WolkeD. (2013). Parenting behavior and the risk of becoming a victim and a bully/victim: A meta-analysis study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 37(12), 1091–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.03.001
13.
LivingstoneS.HaddonL.GörzigA.ÓlafssonK. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. EU Kids Online, London School of Economics and Political Science.
14.
LivingstoneS.HelsperE. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396
15.
MeschG. S. (2009). Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.00689
16.
NavarroR.SernaC.MartínezV.Ruiz-OlivaR. (2013). The role of internet use and parental mediation on cyberbullying victimization among Spanish children from rural public schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 725–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10212-012-0137-2
17.
NikkenP.de HaanJ. (2015). Guiding young children’s internet use at home: Problems that parents experience in their parental mediation and the need for parenting support. Cyberpsychology. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9, 3. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-3
18.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
19.
RiversI.PoteatV. P.NoretN.AshurstN. (2009). Observing bullying at school: The mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(4), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018164
SeligmanM. E. P. (1975). Helplessness. W. H. Freeman.
22.
SmithP. K.MahdaviJ.CarvalhoM.FisherS.RussellS.TippettN. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
TalvesK.KalmusV. (2015). Gendered mediation of children’s internet use: A keyhole for looking into changing socialization practices. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9, 4. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-4
25.
Van CleemputK.VandeboschH.PabianS. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “Helping,” “Joining In,” and “Doing Nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 383–396.
26.
Van Den EijndenR.MeerkerkG.VermulstA.SpijkermanR.EngelsR. C. M. E. (2008). Online communication, compulsive internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.655
27.
WachsS. (2012). Moral disengagement and emotional and social difficulties in bullying and cyberbullying: Differences by participant role. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3–4), 347–360.
28.
WachsS.HessM.ScheithauerH.SchubarthW. (2016). Mobbing an Schulen: Erkennen, Handeln, Vorbeugen. Kohlhammer.
29.
WrightM. F. (2014). Predictors of anonymous cyber aggression: The role of adolescents’ beliefs about anonymity, aggression, and the permanency of digital content. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(7), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0457
30.
WrightM. F. (2015). Cyber victimization and adjustment difficulties: The mediation of Chinese and American adolescents’ digital technology usage. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research in Cyberspace, 9, 1. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-7
31.
WrightM. F. (2017). Parental mediation, cyberbullying, and cybertrolling: The role of gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.059
32.
WrightM. F. (2018). Cyberbullying victimization through social networking sites and adjustment difficulties: The role of parental mediation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(2), 1.
33.
WrightM. F.LiY. (2013). The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: The moderating effect of peer rejection. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42, 662–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9903-3
34.
WrightM. F.WachsS. (2020). Parental support, health, and cyberbullying among adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29, 2390–2401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01739-9
35.
WrightM. F.WachsS.HarperB. D. (2018). The moderation of empathy in the longitudinal association between witnessing cyberbullying, depression, and anxiety. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(4), 6. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-4-6
36.
YbarraM. L.Diener-WestM.LeafP. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6Suppl 1), S42–S50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.004
