Bidirectional Relationships Between Cyberbystanders’ Roles,Cyberbullying Perpetration,and Justification of Violence

Abstract

Bystanders play a key role in understanding the phenomenon of cyberbullying (CB). The main aim of this study is to explore longitudinal bidirectional relationships among cyberbystanders’ reaction, CB perpetration, and CB justification. Participants were 1,105 adolescents (56.7% girls; M_age = 13.56, SD = 1.21) who answered self-reported questionnaires about CB perpetration, CB justification, and cyberbystanders’ reaction at two measurement periods spaced 8 months apart. The results showed that cyberbystanders who assisted and/or reinforced the aggressor had higher scores for CB perpetration and justification than those who supported or defended the victim. Furthermore, cyberbystanders’ pro-aggressive behavior at Time 1 (T1) predicted an increase in CB perpetration and justification at Time 2 (T2), and T1 CB perpetration predicted an increase in T2 CB justification. These findings highlight the precursor role that acting as an assistant or reinforcer of the perpetrator may have on their own perpetration of future CB aggressions.

Keywords

cyberbullying cyberbystanders justification of violence cyberbullying roles

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ang

R. P.

Tan

K. A.

Mansor

A. T.

(2011). Normative beliefs about aggression as a mediator of narcissistic exploitativeness and cyberbullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(13), 2619–2634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510388286

Barlett

Coyne

S. M.

(2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: The moderating role of age. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21555

Barlinska

Szuster

Winiewski

(2018). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of affective versus cognitive empathy in increasing prosocial cyberbystander behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00799

Barlińska

Szuster

Winiewski

(2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2137

Barlińska

Szuster

Winiewski

(2015). The role of short- and long-term cognitive empathy activation in preventing cyberbystander reinforcing cyberbullying behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(4), 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0412

Branson

C. E.

Cornell

D. G.

(2009). A comparison of self and peer reports in the assessment of middle school bullying. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 25(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377900802484133

Brochado

Soares

Fraga

(2017). A scoping review on studies of cyberbullying prevalence among adolescents. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 18(5), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016641668

Burton

K. A.

Florell

Wygant

D. B.

(2013). The role of peer attachment and normative beliefs about aggression on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Psychology in the Schools, 50(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21663

Byrne

B. M.

(2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882

10.

Calvete

(2008). Justification of violence and grandiosity schemas as predictors of antisocial behavior in adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(7), 1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9229-5

11.

Calvete

Orue

Estévez

Villardón

Padilla

(2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017

12.

Calvete

Orue

Hankin

B. L.

(2013). Transactional relationships among cognitive vulnerabilities, stressors, and depressive symptoms in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(3), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9691-y

13.

Dang

Liu

(2020). Me and others around: The roles of personal and social norms in chinese adolescent bystanders’ responses toward cyberbullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520967128

14.

Doane

A. N.

Ehlke

Kelley

M. L.

(2020). Bystanders against cyberbullying: A video program for college students. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00051-5

15.

Dong

Peng

C. Y. J.

(2013). Principled missing data methods for researchers. SpringerPlus, 2, 222. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-222

16.

Erreygers

Pabian

Vandebosch

Baillien

(2016). Helping behavior among adolescent bystanders of cyberbullying: The role of impulsivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.03.003

17.

Fontaine

R. G.

Dodge

K. A.

(2009). The transactional development of individual social-information processing and aggressive behavior. In Sameroff

A. J.

(Ed.), Transactional development: Operationalizing a dynamic system. American Psychological Association.

18.

Fontaine

R. G.

Yang

Dodge

K. A.

Pettit

G. S.

Bates

J. E.

(2009). Development of response evaluation and decision (RED) and antisocial behavior in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 447. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014142

19.

Gámez-Guadix

Villa-George

Calvete

(2014). Psychometric properties of the cyberbullying questionnaire (CBQ) among mexican adolescents. Violence and Victims, 29(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00163R1

20.

Gendron

B. P.

Williams

K. R.

Guerra

N. G.

(2011). An analysis of bullying among students within schools: Estimating the effects of individual normative beliefs, self-esteem, and school climate. Journal of School Violence, 10(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2010.539166

21.

González-Cabrera

J. M.

León-Mejía

Machimbarrena

J. M.

Balea

Calvete

(2019). Psychometric properties of the cyberbullying triangulation questionnaire: A prevalence analysis through seven roles. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(2), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12518

22.

González-Cabrera

Sánchez-Álvarez

Calvete

León-Mejía

Orue

Machimbarrena

J. M.

(2020). Psychometric properties of the triangulated version of the European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire: Prevalence across seven roles. Psychology in the Schools, 57(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22320

23.

Holfeld

Mishna

(2018). Longitudinal associations in youth involvement as victimized, bullying, or witnessing cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(4), 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0369

24.

Huesmann

L. R.

Guerra

N. G.

(1997). Children’s normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 408. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.408

25.

IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 24.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp.

26.

Jöreskog

K.G.

Sörbom

(2018). LISREL 10 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International, Inc.

27.

Kowalski

R. M.

Giumetti

G. W.

Schroeder

A. N.

Lattanner

M. R.

(2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618

28.

Krahé

Busching

(2014). Interplay of normative beliefs and behavior in developmental patterns of physical and relational aggression in adolescence: A four-wave longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01146

29.

Kwan

Dickson

Richardson

MacDowall

Burchett

Stansfield

Brunton

Sutcliffe

Thomas

(2020). Cyberbullying and children and young people’s mental health: A systematic map of systematic reviews. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0370

30.

Little

T. D.

(2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.

31.

Little

T. D.

Cunningham

W. A.

Shahar

Widaman

K. F.

(2002). To parcel or not toparcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1

32.

Little

R. J. A.

Rubin

D. B.

(1989). The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods & Research, 18(2–3), 292–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189018002004

33.

Machackova

Dedkova

Sevcikova

Cerna

(2018). Bystanders’ supportive and passive responses to cyberaggression. Journal of School Violence, 17(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2016.1222499

34.

Machackova

Pfetsch

(2016). Bystanders’ responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: The role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12277

35.

Marciano

Schulz

P. J.

Camerini

A.-L.

(2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization in youth: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz031

36.

Menesini

Nocentini

Palladino

B. E.

Frisén

Berne

Ortega-Ruiz

Calmaestra

Scheithauer

Schultze-Krumbholz

P. L.

Naruskov

Blaya

Berthaud

Smith

P. K.

(2012). Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: A comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(9), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0040

37.

Menesini

Salmivalli

(2017). Bullying in schools: The state of knowledge and effective interventions. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 22(Suppl. 1), 240–253.

38.

Orue

Calvete

(2018). Homophobic bullying in schools: The role of homophobic attitudes and exposure to homophobic aggression. School Psychology Review, 47(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0063.V47-1

39.

Orue

Calvete

Fernández-González

(2019). Early maladaptive schemas and social information processing in child-to-parent aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519831395

40.

Pabian

Vandebosch

Poels

Van Cleemput

Bastiaensens

(2016). Exposure to cyberbullying as a bystander: An investigation of desensitization effects among early adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.022

41.

Paulhus

D. L.

Vazire

(2007). The self-report method. In Robins

R. W.

Fraley

R. C.

Krueger

R. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (p. 224–239). The Guilford Press.

42.

Polanin

J. R.

Espelage

D. L.

Grotpeter

J. K.

Ingram

Michaelson

Spinney

Valido

El Sheikh

Torgal

Robinson

(2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to decrease cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Prevention Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01259-y

43.

Salmivalli

(2014). Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions?. Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 286–292.

44.

Salmivalli

Lagerspetz

Björkqvist

Österman

Kaukiainen

(1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T

45.

Schultze-Krumbholz

Hess

Pfetsch

Scheithauer

(2018). Who is involved in cyberbullying? Latent class analysis of cyberbullying roles and their associations with aggression, self-esteem, and empathy. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(4), article 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-4-2

46.

Smith

P. K.

Mahdavi

Carvalho

Fisher

Russell

Tippett

(2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 49(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x

47.

Tokunaga

R. S.

(2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014

48.

Van Cleemput

Vandebosch

Pabian

(2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping,” “joining in,” and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21534

49.

Vlaanderen

Bevelander

K. E.

Kleemans

(2020). Empowering digital citizenship: An anti-cyberbullying intervention to increase children’s intentions to intervene on behalf of the victim. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106459

50.

B. T.

Van Heel

Petry

Bosmans

(2020). The association between normative beliefs approving aggression and overt aggressive behavior in vietnamese adolescents: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 40(4), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431619858399

51.

Wang

Zhao

Yang

Lei

(2019). School climate and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and friends’ moral identity. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519860089

52.

Walters

G. D.

Espelage

D. L.

(2021). Cognitive/Affective Empathy, Pro-Bullying Beliefs, and Willingness to Intervene on Behalf of a Bullied Peer. Youth & Society, 53(4), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X19858565

53.

Wright

M. F.

(2014). Predictors of anonymous cyber aggression: The role of adolescents’ beliefs about anonymity, aggression, and the permanency of digital content. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(7), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0457

54.

Wright

M. F.

(2013). Normative beliefs about aggression and cyber aggression among young adults: A longitudinal investigation. Aggressive Behavior, 39(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21470

55.

Yudes-Gómez

Baridon-Chauvie

González-Cabrera

J. M.

(2018). Cyberbullying and problematic Internet use in Colombia, Uruguay and Spain: Cross-cultural study. Comunicar, 26(56), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.3916/C56-2018-05

56.

Zhu

Huang

Evans

Zhang

(2021). Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: A comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and preventive measures. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 634909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.634909