Little attention has focused on how adolescents’ perceptions of the pressure to be popular or socially preferred from parents, friends, and the media influence their engagement in face-to-face and cyber aggressive and prosocial behaviors. The present study examined these relationships among 857 seventh graders (M age = 12.19; 50.8% girls) from seven middle schools in the Midwestern United States. Adolescents completed questionnaires on their perceptions of the pressure to be perceived as popular and socially preferred from parents, friends, and the media; their face-to-face and cyber social behaviors; and peer nominations of social preference and popularity. The findings revealed that adolescents’ perceptions of their parents’ and friends’ pressure for popularity and social preference related to adolescents’ social behaviors in both the face-to-face and cyber contexts, controlling for social preference and popularity. Gender did not moderate these associations.
AlexanderC.PiazzaM.MekosD.ValenteT. (2001). Peer, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 22-30.
2.
AllenJ. P.PorterM. R.McFarlandC. F. (2006). Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: Susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability, and depression. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 155-172.
3.
AngR. P.GohD. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41, 387-397.
4.
BaumanS.ToomeyR. B.WalkerJ. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 341-350.
5.
BrownB. B.LarsonJ. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 74-103). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6.
BrownJ. D.BobkowskiP. S. (2011). Older and newer media: Patterns of use and effects on adolescents’ health and well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 95-113.
7.
CillessenA.MayeuxL. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163.
8.
CoieJ. D.DodgeK. A.CoppotelliH. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.
9.
CrickN. R.GrotpeterJ. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.
10.
DirikxA.Van den BulckJ. (2014). Media use and the process-based model for police cooperation: An integrative approach towards explaining adolescents’ intentions to cooperate with the police. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 344-365.
11.
GradingerP.StrohmeierD.SpielC. (2009). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification of risk groups for adjustment problems. Journal of Psychology, 217, 205-213.
12.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29, 129-156.
13.
HuesmannL. R.Moise-TitusJ.PodolskiC.EronL. D. (2003). Longitudinal relations between children’s exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood: 1977-1992. Developmental Psychology, 39, 201-221.
14.
JohnsonJ. G.CohenP.SmailesE. M.KasenS.BrookJ. S. (2002). Television viewing and aggressive behavior during adolescence and adulthood. Science, 295, 2468-2471.
15.
JuvonenJ.GrossE. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78, 496-505.
16.
KehoeC. E.HavignhurstS. S.HarleyA. E. (2014). Tuning in to teens: Improving parent emotion socialization to reduce youth internalizing difficulties. Social Development, 23, 413-432.
17.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635-647.
18.
MastronardiM. (2003). Adolescence and media. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 83-93.
19.
McCabeM. P.RicciardelliL. A.FinemoreJ. (2002). The role of puberty, media and popularity with peers on strategies to increase weight, decrease weight and increase muscle tone among adolescent boys and girls. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 52, 145-153.
20.
McKayM. T.ColeJ. C. (2012). The relationship between alcohol use and peer pressure susceptibility, peer popularity and general conformity in Northern Irish school children. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 19, 213-222.
21.
PrinsteinM. J. (2007). Moderators of peer contagion: A longitudinal examination of depression socialization between adolescents and their best friends. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 36, 159-170. doi:10.1080/15374410701274934
22.
PrinsteinM. J.CillessenA. H. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310-342.
23.
SanterD. A.MesserveyD.KusumakarV. (2000). Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: Predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 163-182.
24.
Savin-WilliamsR. C.BerndtT. J. (1990). Friendships and peer relations during adolescence. In FeldmanS. S.ElliottG. R. (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
SchaeferD. R.AdamsJ.HaasS. A. (2013). Social networks and smoking: Exploring the effects of peer influence and smoker popularity through simulations. Health Education & Behavior, 40(Suppl. 1), 24S-32S.
26.
SchoffstallC. L.CohenR. (2011). Cyber aggression: The relation between online offenders and offline social competence. Social Development, 20, 587-604.
27.
SmahelD.WrightM. F.CernikovaM. (2014). Classification of online problematic situations in the context of youths’ development. Communications: European Journal of Communication Research, 39, 233-260.
28.
SmetanaJ. G.RobinsonJ.RoteW. M. (2015). Socialization in adolescence. In GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 60-84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
TanskiS. E.StoolmillerM.GerrardM.SargentJ. D. (2012). Moderation of the association between media exposure and youth smoking onset: Race/ethnicity, and parent smoking. Prevention Science, 13, 55-63.
30.
TatarM. (1995). Parental vies of popularity and stress among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 679-686.
VandenA. M.CampbellS. W.EggermontS.RoeK. (2014). Sexting, mobile porn use, and peer group dynamics: Boys’ and girls’ self-perceived popularity, need for popularity, and perceived peer pressure. Media Psychology, 17, 6-33.
33.
WaughW.BrownellC.PollockB. (2015). Early socialization of prosocial behavior: Patterns in parents’ encouragement of toddlers’ helping in an everyday household task. Infant Behavior & Development, 39, 1-10.
34.
WrightF. (2014). Longitudinal investigation of the associations between adolescents’ popularity and cyber social behaviors. Journal of School Violence, 13, 291-314.
35.
WrightM. F. (2015). The role of the media and the cyber context in adolescents’ popularity. In LorentzP.SmahelD.MetykovaM.WrightM. F. (Eds.), Living in the digital age: Self-presentation, networking, playing, and participation in politics (pp. 49-59). Brno, Czech Republic: Muni Press.
36.
WrightM. F.LiY. (2013). The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: The moderating effect of peer rejection. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 662-674.
37.
WrightM. F.LiY.ShiJ. (2014). Chinese adolescents’ social status goals: Associations with behaviors and attributions for relational aggression. Youth & Society, 46, 566-588.
